LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user says "loop me" or asks to design a recurring workflow. Don't use for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user needs a compact read-only current-work view from Git state, recorded test evidence, and optional graph.yaml. Not for tasks that need source or remote-system changes.

Use when a project is between phases, the author asks what to do next, too many threads are open, or work needs re-entry. Not for gating whether one named task may proceed.

Use when a user commits to a direction and asks to plan, brief, or research it; modes score, breakdown, shape, visual. Not for codebase audit: use plan-review. Not for four-phase review: use autoplan.

Use when a design dispute has at least two live interpretations and the caller wants worlds made explicit or a plain-language recommendation. Not for selecting a design or source/remote changes.

Use when asked to judge whether to adopt, switch, reject, or revisit technology, library, pattern, or architecture, or a second opinion. Not for scoping: use brainstorm. Not for forks: use decide.

Use when a user asks for a gut-check on a decision or action, or asks whether enough is known to proceed. Not for numeric confidence scoring.

Use when the user asks for a flattened view of roadmaps and next actions. Not for multi-session route planning: use wayfinder.

Use when the user wants to harden a chosen but tentative artifact into one durable result. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when starting a project or feature, requirements are unclear, or a change crosses modules. Not for implementing from an existing spec: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when work has distinct modes and the user wants states, events, guards, outcomes, illegal transitions, not a prose todo list. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when a user wants to design an abstraction boundary that collapses a complex implementation into a simpler interface without leaking internal state. Not for implementation.

Use when user wants an async questionnaire, a discovery questionnaire, or a knowledge gap needs answers outside the repo. Not for direct conversation: use askme. Not for agent research: use research.

Use when settled conversation decisions need synthesis into an agent-ready implementation spec, stopping before publication. Not for turning plans into tickets: use to-tickets.

Use when a settled plan needs implementation tickets published as blocker-linked slices, tracer bullets, or expand-contract sequencing. Not for implementation: use work.

Use when a message contains `TODO ADD: <requirement>`. Not for deepening coarse lists: use todos-enhance. Not for resyncing lists: use todos-update. Not for retitling/reordering/completing todos.

Use when tasks are too vague, read as headings, or the user asks to sophisticate the todos. Not for stale reconciliation: use todos-update. Not for adding requirements: use todo-add.

Use when user asks to update todos, resync the task list, say what to do next, or plan and tree have drifted apart. Not for coarse lists: use todos-enhance. Not for adding requirements: use todo-add.

Use when a greenfield project or large feature build will not fit in a single agent session. Don't use for implementation, remote credential changes, or work that fits in one session.

Use when the user wants adversarial stress-testing of a proposed architecture, structure, or shape. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Validate application configuration with schemas, per-environment rules, runtime checks, and secure handling of sensitive values

Preflight a DGX Spark system for an ML training or inference workload and emit env-report.json

Set up debugging and tracing with remote debugging, distributed tracing, debug logging, profiling, and production diagnostics

Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current

Analyze and resolve errors across the full application lifecycle — from stack traces to distributed tracing — using systematic root-cause analysis and observability tools.

Set up error tracking and monitoring — implement structured logging, configure alerts, and integrate with error tracking services for real-time error detection.

Coordinate specialized review agents in parallel or in sequence and synthesize their findings into one code review

Analyze and resolve errors across the full application lifecycle — from stack traces to distributed tracing — using systematic root-cause analysis and observability tools.

Set up error tracking and monitoring — implement structured logging, configure alerts, and integrate with error tracking services for real-time error detection.

AI-assisted smart debugging — parse error messages, stack traces, and failure patterns to identify root causes and produce a fix with automated observability steps.

Generate comprehensive migration plans and scripts for transitioning codebases between frameworks, languages, versions, or platforms with minimal disruption.

Plan and execute safe, incremental dependency upgrades with minimal risk — including breaking-change migration paths and proper test verification.

Orchestrate legacy system modernization using the strangler fig pattern with gradual component replacement

Scaffold React and React Native components with TypeScript, tests, styles, and Storybook stories

Scan React, Vue, Angular, and vanilla JavaScript code for XSS vulnerabilities and report fixes with secure coding examples

Orchestrate end-to-end full-stack feature development across backend, frontend, database, and infrastructure layers

Orchestrate git workflow from code review through PR creation with quality gates

Create a role-specific onboarding plan for a new team member, from pre-arrival setup through the first 90 days

Enhance a pull request with a generated description, review checklist, risk assessment, and test coverage report

Orchestrate multi-agent incident response with modern SRE practices for rapid resolution and learning

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Automatic memory consolidation for OpenClaw agents — like sleep for your AI. Powered by MyClaw.ai

🗂 The essential checklist for modern web development, for humans and AI agents

Distribb CLI, Claude, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw skill for AI-powered SEO. Write content with your own AI, publish through Distribb's backlink network.

Open-source AI browser agent — type plain-language commands and Bah operates the web for you. Works with cloud AI (DeepSeek, Mistral, NVIDIA) or local Ollama mo…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

Use your ChatGPT / Codex subscription with DeepSeek Harness via OAuth, with model access, usage quotas, search, and image generation — no API key or Codex CLI r…

Local-first A-share research workbench for DeepSeek Harness: market dashboards, watchlists, valuation, four investor agents, versioned reports, and continuous p…

Open-source video pipeline (clipper, AI video & more) — scout trends, clip long videos, generate captioned shorts, design motion graphics. Local-first, BYOK. AG…

Desktop app for the pi coding agent: streaming timeline, Git review with hunk staging, session tree, native UI for pi extensions. Windows · macOS · Linux. pi 编程…

Zero-dependency browser video editor that AI agents can drive — JSON timeline, MCP + REST, live-reloading UI

Personal Context Manager for Claude Code. Your life in walnuts.

Fast way to switch between Claude Code configuration profiles

AutoClip｜一个链接，一键出片。开源 AI 视频剪辑桌面工具，将播客、访谈、课程等长视频自动剪成短视频，生成字幕、封面和发布文案，适配抖音、小红书、TikTok、Reels 与 YouTube Shorts。Open-source AI video clipping & content repurposing.