LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user says "loop me" or asks to design a recurring workflow. Don't use for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user needs a compact read-only current-work view from Git state, recorded test evidence, and optional graph.yaml. Not for tasks that need source or remote-system changes.

Use when a project is between phases, the author asks what to do next, too many threads are open, or work needs re-entry. Not for gating whether one named task may proceed.

Use when a user commits to a direction and asks to plan, brief, or research it; modes score, breakdown, shape, visual. Not for codebase audit: use plan-review. Not for four-phase review: use autoplan.

Use when a design dispute has at least two live interpretations and the caller wants worlds made explicit or a plain-language recommendation. Not for selecting a design or source/remote changes.

Use when asked to judge whether to adopt, switch, reject, or revisit technology, library, pattern, or architecture, or a second opinion. Not for scoping: use brainstorm. Not for forks: use decide.

Use when a user asks for a gut-check on a decision or action, or asks whether enough is known to proceed. Not for numeric confidence scoring.

Use when the user asks for a flattened view of roadmaps and next actions. Not for multi-session route planning: use wayfinder.

Use when the user wants to harden a chosen but tentative artifact into one durable result. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when starting a project or feature, requirements are unclear, or a change crosses modules. Not for implementing from an existing spec: use spec-driven-implementation.

Use when work has distinct modes and the user wants states, events, guards, outcomes, illegal transitions, not a prose todo list. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when a user wants to design an abstraction boundary that collapses a complex implementation into a simpler interface without leaking internal state. Not for implementation.

Use when user wants an async questionnaire, a discovery questionnaire, or a knowledge gap needs answers outside the repo. Not for direct conversation: use askme. Not for agent research: use research.

Use when settled conversation decisions need synthesis into an agent-ready implementation spec, stopping before publication. Not for turning plans into tickets: use to-tickets.

Use when a settled plan needs implementation tickets published as blocker-linked slices, tracer bullets, or expand-contract sequencing. Not for implementation: use work.

Use when a message contains `TODO ADD: <requirement>`. Not for deepening coarse lists: use todos-enhance. Not for resyncing lists: use todos-update. Not for retitling/reordering/completing todos.

Use when tasks are too vague, read as headings, or the user asks to sophisticate the todos. Not for stale reconciliation: use todos-update. Not for adding requirements: use todo-add.

Use when user asks to update todos, resync the task list, say what to do next, or plan and tree have drifted apart. Not for coarse lists: use todos-enhance. Not for adding requirements: use todo-add.

Use when a greenfield project or large feature build will not fit in a single agent session. Don't use for implementation, remote credential changes, or work that fits in one session.

Use when the user wants adversarial stress-testing of a proposed architecture, structure, or shape. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Turn a GAIA workflow misfire into a redacted, classified, filing-ready bug report in one read-only pass. Self-diagnoses config issues inline; files probable bugs upstream on confirmation.

Judge-the-form, human-gated hardening. Reviews recurring code-audit-frontend findings and, with approval, drafts the lowest-context-weight form (deterministic check / skill / path-scoped prose rule) into the working tree. Pass `list` to see live candidates or `why <finding_class>` to explain one.

Initialize a new project from the GAIA React template, renames, strips GAIA branding, configures i18n, installs Claude skills/plugins.

Plan a complex feature using GAIA's task-orchestration pattern, structures the work into fresh-context subagent phases for your approval. Does not implement.

Cut a new GAIA release, bump version, graduate CHANGELOG, regenerate manifest, open release PR, then tag on merge. Maintainer-only.

Detect and, on explicit consent, additively append the languages Serena is not indexing to the `languages:` list in `.serena/project.yml`, then prompt a Serena restart. Never mutates without a yes; inert without Serena.

Author an immutable SPEC artifact through Socratic discovery (spec-kit wrapper), then STOP. Terminal, never runs /gaia-plan; it prints a /gaia-plan prompt the human pastes into a fresh session. Pass `auto <description>` for non-interactive mode that answers its own questions.

Maintainer-only autonomous health audit + auto-heal loop. Runs N=3 fresh-team audit-fix-audit cycles with circuit breakers, reports an F-to-A+ verdict (folding in the shared Claude-integration fitness grade) or escalates.

Single post-init onboarding command; detects situation, runs only owed phases; safe to re-run. --reconfigure rotates token and re-selects tools.

GAIA before_specify hook: constitution placeholder check + spec-kit version-pin drift detection.

GAIA after_specify hook: immutability lint over the just-written SPEC artifact.

Close a plan after implementation+merge. Offers wiki-promote for the plan's consolidated SUMMARY.md, cold-consolidates an out-of-band merge, then early-reaps the local plan folder once cost is represented in cost.jsonl.

GAIA self-review: pre-gate-2 review pass on the in-progress SPEC draft.

Close a SPEC after implementation+merge. Optional drain of deferred wiki-promote, cold-consolidates an out-of-band merge into SUMMARY.md, then early-reaps the local SPEC folder once cost is represented in cost.jsonl.

GAIA Socratic discovery wrapper: /speckit-specify for the initial draft, then GAIA's own Socratic clarify loop.

GAIA before_implement hook: render PO-authored UATs into Playwright e2e specs at .playwright/e2e/spec-NNN/.

Promote merged SPEC or plan content into the GAIA wiki.

This project uses the GAIA preset. Bare `/speckit-clarify` is not the clarify path here: core clarify writes an off-shape artifact (a `## Clarifications` / `### Session` block with five-word answers) and carries a question cap GAIA does not use. Run `/gaia-spec` instead — it driv

GAIA-wrapped /speckit-specify: writes through core, then relocates the artifact to .gaia/local/specs/SPEC-NNN/SPEC.md and stamps GAIA frontmatter.

Show or configure the compact Fallow Impact statusline in Claude Code

面向中文开发者的 Claude Code Skills / Agents / Plugins 精选与原创技能库｜按场景分类｜复制即装｜持续更新

原生 macOS Git 客户端，以 Agent 驱动仓库管理、审阅与协作。

A 股短线复盘看板：涨停池·连板梯队·龙虎榜·板块资金一屏看完，赚钱效应/晋级率/梯队断层/情绪周期等派生指标纯计算直出（不经过 AI），AI 只把数据串成能读的盘面研判。全本地运行，可用 Claude/Codex 订阅免 API key。| A-share short-term daily-review dashbo…

禁漫天堂 Agent Skills / AI 原生 JMComic 助手：通过 MCP 与 Skills 将 JMComic 注入你的 AI Agent. / AI-powered JMComic assistant for seamless integration with AI Agents via MCP & S…

Pairlet (formerly CC Pocket / cc-pocket) — Continue your local AI coding tasks from phone, tablet, or desktop.

Self-hosted Personal AI + agent runtime in .NET (NativeAOT-friendly)

A self-hosted knowledge platform for humans and AI agents — publish wikis, blogs, and portable Agent Skills.

Notion CLI with AI agent support. Smart queries, Obsidian sync, batch ops, backups, validation and more.

AI Coding Agent Multiplexer

Independent executor–verifier orchestration for software changes.

AI-native, local-first video editor by Ribbi — runs entirely in the browser. Rust/WASM engine, WebGPU compositing, WebCodecs export; humans and LLM agents edit…

Distill your knowledge, memories, and decisions into an open-source, inspectable AI Agent Twin.

🔬 Harness Vibe Research with Self-evolving AI Scientists

Personal AI desktop agent for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android & iOS. Set a goal, it works on its own. Teams (pair two desktops, agents + humans), Agent2Agent, Wo…

Run agents like a company. AgentOS is the native control plane for OpenClaw — manage agents, tasks, models, context, approvals, and runtime visibility from one…

Create Agentic admin panels faster on TypeScript and Vue.js with AdminForth Framework. Setup main CRUD pages within minutes, extend as you need

OpenJudge: A Unified Framework for Holistic Evaluation and Quality Rewards

An ebook reader with a self-evolving agent: it remembers your reading across books, and plugins extend the reader and the agent alike.

A curated list of awesome resources for vibe coding

Agentic Voice Notes for iPhone and macOS - Rust, Dioxus, LanceDB + RIG + SQLite