LLM Mart Basic

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.

Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.

Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.

Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.

Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".

Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.

Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.

Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.

Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.

Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.

Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.

Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

> **Usage:** Run before every commit to ensure code quality.

> **Usage:** Validate skill files for correctness, completeness, and quality.

面向中文开发者的 Claude Code Skills / Agents / Plugins 精选与原创技能库｜按场景分类｜复制即装｜持续更新

原生 macOS Git 客户端，以 Agent 驱动仓库管理、审阅与协作。

A 股短线复盘看板：涨停池·连板梯队·龙虎榜·板块资金一屏看完，赚钱效应/晋级率/梯队断层/情绪周期等派生指标纯计算直出（不经过 AI），AI 只把数据串成能读的盘面研判。全本地运行，可用 Claude/Codex 订阅免 API key。| A-share short-term daily-review dashbo…

禁漫天堂 Agent Skills / AI 原生 JMComic 助手：通过 MCP 与 Skills 将 JMComic 注入你的 AI Agent. / AI-powered JMComic assistant for seamless integration with AI Agents via MCP & S…

Pairlet (formerly CC Pocket / cc-pocket) — Continue your local AI coding tasks from phone, tablet, or desktop.

Self-hosted Personal AI + agent runtime in .NET (NativeAOT-friendly)

A self-hosted knowledge platform for humans and AI agents — publish wikis, blogs, and portable Agent Skills.

Notion CLI with AI agent support. Smart queries, Obsidian sync, batch ops, backups, validation and more.

AI Coding Agent Multiplexer

Independent executor–verifier orchestration for software changes.

AI-native, local-first video editor by Ribbi — runs entirely in the browser. Rust/WASM engine, WebGPU compositing, WebCodecs export; humans and LLM agents edit…

Distill your knowledge, memories, and decisions into an open-source, inspectable AI Agent Twin.

🔬 Harness Vibe Research with Self-evolving AI Scientists

Personal AI desktop agent for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android & iOS. Set a goal, it works on its own. Teams (pair two desktops, agents + humans), Agent2Agent, Wo…

Run agents like a company. AgentOS is the native control plane for OpenClaw — manage agents, tasks, models, context, approvals, and runtime visibility from one…

Create Agentic admin panels faster on TypeScript and Vue.js with AdminForth Framework. Setup main CRUD pages within minutes, extend as you need

OpenJudge: A Unified Framework for Holistic Evaluation and Quality Rewards

An ebook reader with a self-evolving agent: it remembers your reading across books, and plugins extend the reader and the agent alike.

A curated list of awesome resources for vibe coding

Agentic Voice Notes for iPhone and macOS - Rust, Dioxus, LanceDB + RIG + SQLite