LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.
Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.
Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.
Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.
Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.
Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.
Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.
Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.
Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".
Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.
Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.
Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.
Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.
Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.
Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.
Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.
Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/know
Know
What do I know about a topic
/link
Link
Find and add missing connections
/lint
Lint
Audit structure and repair what is mechanical
/merge
Merge
Merge two pages
/metrics
Metrics
Record a dated metrics snapshot
/monthly
Monthly
The monthly structural review
/orphans
Orphans
Find unreachable pages
/outline
Outline
Outline a piece from your concept pages
/privacy
Privacy
Audit what should not be in the vault
/project-status
Project status
Where a project stands
/project
Project
Create a project
/prune
Prune
Find what is safe to remove
/publish
Publish
Check what is safe to publish
/quiz
Quiz
Test yourself on your own pages
/rename
Rename
Rename a page and fix every link
/report
Report
Write a research report
/retype
Retype
Fix a page's type
/review
Review
Periodic review of what the vault learned
/rollback
Rollback
Undo the last run
/schedule
Schedule
Set up scheduled maintenance
🤖 MateClaw — Your second brain with Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Multi-Channel Support. Built on Spring AI Alibaba.
12 views 0 likesVibe-Research: Your Personal Trading Research Agent · A股/美股/港股 的个人投研 Agent:每日复盘、资讯雷达、个股数据、板块中心、我的持仓、研究记录、回测。Vibe-Research 把数据和功能配齐,由你自己的 Agent 驱动投资研究。基于开源的 Code…
8 views 0 likesWayland - The AI Agent That Perceives. Reasons. Acts. Evolves.
15 views 0 likesObservability and enforcement for AI agent harnesses. Capture every run and runtime reliability with policy enforcement. 40 built-in policies, a local dashboar…
16 views 0 likesTurn your Solana Seeker (or any Android phone) into a 24/7 personal AI agent
12 views 0 likesA curated collection of offensive, defensive and AI/LLM security tools.
11 views 0 likesAI agent 通用任务治理框架:对齐目标与事实,规划和调度能力,守住授权与风险边界,治理任务执行到真实验收与交付。Governance framework for evidence-driven planning, orchestration, and verified delivery.
21 views 0 likesOpen-source (Apache-2.0) PDF takeoff for construction & flooring — the first engine an AI agent drives natively over MCP, not bolted on. One-click room detectio…
11 views 0 likesStop degrading your model's reasoning. A minimal, zero-config AI coding agent. Enforced ephemeral subagents keep context pure. From tiny local models up to Sol,…
14 views 0 likes实习.skill — 双非也能拿大厂 offer。帮你改简历、抠面经、准备面试,把真实背景翻译成面试官想要的样子。
15 views 0 likes专门为 agent 打造的 agent 搜索工具,具备多语言搜索能力,覆盖中文/英文/学术/代码/购物/金融/新闻/百科。
9 views 0 likesLocal-first AI agent workspace for multi-agent collaboration, agent orchestration, scoped permissions, evidence-aware runs, and human-in-the-loop decisions.
11 views 0 likesKeyboard-first desktop Kanban workspace for AI coding agents with embedded terminals, git worktrees, and hook-driven task tracking.
15 views 0 likesClaude Code Prompt Mechanism Visualizer — Electron desktop app
19 views 0 likesMulti-repo semantic code search MCP server in Rust — hybrid vector + BM25 retrieval, tree-sitter AST chunking, fully offline. For OpenCode, Claude Code, Cursor,…
18 views 0 likesOne-ink editorial print image skill — warm paper, halftone photography, active negative space, and restrained typography.
17 views 0 likesUS stock market data for AI coding assistants — zero-auth, official sources. CBOE options with full Greeks + 0DTE flow, FINRA market-wide short volume, SEC EDGA…
15 views 0 likesAI-powered Werewolf (Mafia) social deduction game where every player is controlled by top LLMs like DeepSeek, Qwen, Gemini, and more
10 views 0 likesA股全栈数据工具包 · 十一层架构 · 54端点 · 19数据源 · 零鉴权 | Full-stack China A-share data toolkit for AI agents — 11 layers, 54 endpoints, 19 sources, zero-auth
14 views 0 likesAgentic desktop GUI client for Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, DynamoDB, MongoDB & EasySearch. Natural language queries, visual management, and monitoring. Privacy-f…
11 views 0 likes