LLM Mart Basic

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.

Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.

Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.

Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.

Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".

Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.

Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.

Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.

Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.

Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.

Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.

Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Update implementation documentation including specs, status, and best practices

Use structured stepper approach for problem-solving and project development

Write unit and integration tests

Developer agent — implements features based on technical design, follows TDD patterns, and produces clean, tested code

Autonomous iteration loop — reads progress, selects role, executes, verifies, commits, and moves to next task without waiting

Pair programming mode — step-by-step collaboration with 5 confirmation checkpoints for learning and sensitive operations

Product Manager agent — analyzes requirements, creates REQ documents, and breaks down features into actionable items

Configure claude-hud as your Claude Code statusline

Grade this repo's CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md (0–100) and return a worst-first fix list

Scaffold a CLAUDE.md for this repo from battle-tested templates, filled in with the project's real commands

Prompt optimizer — rewrite this request into an optimized prompt (ultrathink), then carry it out

Configure codex-hud statusline display options (guided interactive flow)

Show last 30 days Codex cost breakdown

Show today's Codex cost breakdown

Show last 7 days Codex cost breakdown

Configure or update the OpenAI Admin API key (enables /codex-hud:costs-*)

Install codex-hud statusline (automatic, idempotent)

Quick one-line summary of today's Codex activity (cost shown if Admin key configured)

Remove the codex-hud statusline integration (restores your previous statusline)

Показать состояние гейта качества 1С — какие файлы ждут проверки

LLM-powered toolkit for skill analysis, AI interviews, resume scoring, and job structuring. Automates professional skill taxonomy and interview processes with a…

【三年面试五年模拟】AIGC/LLM/AI Agent算法工程师面试资源平台。涵盖AIGC、LLM大模型、AI Agent、具身智能、传统深度学习、计算机视觉、自然语言处理、自动驾驶、机器学习、强化学习、大数据挖掘、世界模型、元宇宙、AGI等AI行业面试笔试干货经验与核心跨周期知识。

Easiest and laziest way for building multi-agent LLMs applications.

Drive Claude Code or OpenAI Codex from your phone — resume sessions, stream output, approve tool permissions remotely. End-to-end encrypted, zero-knowledge rela…

MCP server for autonomous agent economies: wallets, signed RTC micropayments, bounty discovery, BoTTube video publishing, and Beacon agent-to-agent messaging. G…

Free, open-source alternative to Microsoft Office with built-in AI agents — Word (.docx), Excel (.xlsx), PowerPoint (.pptx), PDF and Markdown editing for macOS,…

NSE BSE Indian Stock Market Data MCP server — search, screen & analyze all 8,200+ NSE/BSE stocks with 34 tools: live quotes, financials, technicals, 326-ratio s…

全流程 智能招投标 Agent：标书生成 · 招投标解读 · 标书检查 · 标书文档ai排版 · 商机发现 一键完成。 21 项合规检查 · 多模型切换 · RAG 知识库 · OCR 抽取。 从招标公告到可交付 docx 文档，全流程 AI 自动化。

Benzi is AI-native code intelligence infrastructure. Claude Code greps; Cursor embeds; Aider maps signatures; Benzi resolves — and answers in O(1). Every langua…

From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.

Get web data for AI agents and LLMs - fast, efficient, and reliable with Rust

Open-source, license-free MCP server for RTL waveform debug: reads FST waveforms (VCD/FSDB auto-convert) plus a SystemVerilog netlist, with 34 tools covering dr…

Open-source, desktop-grade AI agent that gets real work done — data analysis, slides, docs, video & web research. Built on OpenClaw; runs tools on your real des…

Parallel, isolated dev environments for humans and AI coding agents. Real containers. Real databases. Zero collisions.

OpenCode goal plugin for Codex-style goal mode, /goal slash commands, persistent objectives, and AI coding agent focus.

Battle-tested skill library for AI agents. Save 98% of API costs with ready-to-use code for crypto, PDFs, search, web scraping & more. No trial-and-error, no ex…

Deep Code 是专为 deepseek-v4 模型优化的终端 AI 编码助手，支持深度思考、推理强度控制以及 Agent Skills。

China Unicom's Yuanjing Wanwu Agent Platform is an enterprise-grade, multi-tenant AI agent development platform. It helps users build applications such as intel…

⚡ CloakBrowser MCP server for AI agents: Playwright-powered browsing, clean tool forwarding, Docker support, and multi-session HTTP transport.

MCP-NixOS - Model Context Protocol Server for NixOS resources