LLM Mart Basic

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.

Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.

Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.

Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.

Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".

Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.

Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.

Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.

Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.

Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.

Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.

Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Analyze code performance and propose three specific optimization improvements

Configure and initialize a project following the Product as Code specification for structured, version-controlled product management

Create a new epic following the Product as Code specification with guided workflow

Create a new ticket within an epic following the Product as Code specification

Update ticket status and track progress in Product as Code workflow

Validate Product as Code project structure and files for specification compliance

Audit application performance metrics

Conduct comprehensive PR review from multiple perspectives (PM, Developer, QA, Security)

Prepare and validate release packages

Load project context by reading key documentation files and exploring project structure

Analyze overall project health and metrics

Simulate project outcomes with variable modeling, risk assessment, and resource optimization scenarios.

Sync project structure to Linear workspace

Intelligently refactor and improve code quality

Prepare a new release by updating changelog, version, and documentation

Safely remove a task from the orchestration system, updating all references and dependencies.

Generate comprehensive reports on task execution, progress, and metrics.

Reproduce a specific issue by creating a failing test case

Resume work on existing task orchestrations after session loss or context switch.

Analyze team retrospectives for insights

Open‑WebUI Tools is a modular toolkit designed to extend and enrich your Open WebUI instance, turning it into a powerful AI workstation. With a suite of over 15…

The token-efficient agentic coding workbench. Built for a future where every token counts — it optimizes token usage at the agent-loop level, saving 70%+ on lon…

MCP server for controlling a real iPhone via macOS iPhone Mirroring...and any MacOs app. Screenshot, tap, swipe, type — from any MCP client.

One desktop for all your AI coding Agent — Claude Code, Codex CLI & Gemini CLI. Auto-detect, one-click install, unified chat, file explorer, terminal & editor.…

Pi — A cross-platform AI coding agent, bringing the Claude Code experience to your desktop. No environment setup, no terminal commands. Download and start codin…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

A telegram bot for searching and auto-saving.

金蝶云星空 K3Cloud MCP Server，让 AI 助手（Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、Cline、Cherry Studio、Openclaw 等任意支持 MCP 协议的客户端）通过自然语言查询和操作金蝶 ERP 系统。

Rewrite frontier research using allegorical structural mapping.

Free4Chat is a temporary collaboration fabric for Humans and Agents.

Give any AI agent a full desktop — it sees the screen, clicks, types, and runs apps like a human. Automate anything with a UI: browsers, legacy software, intern…

A personal AI agent that can work safely on your machine, remember useful context, and keep its data under your control.

A framework for AI-driven economic activity. Declarative, composable, observable, deterministic.

Open-source, self-hosted customer support desk in a single binary. A lightweight alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Chatwoot.

54 rigorous skills for Codex, OpenCode, and Pi: code review, security audit, feature development, frontend design, MCP tools, Hugging Face ML/training, and more…

A wonderful list of Game Development resources.

Open Science Desktop — local-first, model-agnostic AI research workbench for macOS, Windows & Linux. Open-source Claude Science desktop alternative built on Tau…

Lexora — Personal AI workspace built around Desktop / 以 Desktop 为核心的个人 AI 工作台

Open-source, AI-native Evernote alternative with native MCP. Zero-cost on Cloudflare or self-hosted with Docker.

Full job-hunt Claude skill bundle — Job Description decoder + Resume builder (11 templates) + Behavioral Interview / story bank. Three self-contained sub-skills…