LLM Mart Basic

Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.

Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.

Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.

Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.

Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.

Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.

Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.

Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".

Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.

Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.

Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.

Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.

Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.

Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.

Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.

Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Implement GraphQL API endpoints

Initialize new project with essential structure

Build reference documentation by creating markdown files and updating CLAUDE.md

Convert GitHub issues to Linear tasks

Triage and prioritize issues effectively

Convert Linear tasks to GitHub issues

READ the llms.txt file from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ethpandaops/xatu-data/refs/heads/master/llms.txt via `curl`. Do nothing else and await further instructions.

Log work from orchestrated tasks to external project management tools like Linear, Obsidian, Jira, or GitHub Issues.

Model customer and market responses with segment analysis, behavioral prediction, and response optimization.

Clean and organize project memory

Create entity relationship diagrams using Mermaid from SQL/database files

Migrate JavaScript project to TypeScript

Assist with system migration planning

Create migration guides for updates

Track and monitor project milestone progress

Update and modernize project dependencies

Move tasks between status folders following the task management protocol.

Optimize build processes and speed

Reduce and optimize bundle sizes

Optimize database queries and performance

A systematic AI Agent development tutorial covering LLM agents, RAG, tool use, memory systems, multi-agent systems, LangChain, LangGraph, MCP, and agentic RL.｜从…

Convert Files / Folders / GitHub Repos Into AI / LLM-ready Files

Open-source, local-first conversational AI video editor with a professional multi-track timeline, Agent Skills, MCP integration, and Remotion rendering.

Maintainer-governed agent for evidence-backed open-source contribution proposals

A Claude Code skill by Hao (駱君昊) that learns your Facebook voice and auto-posts to FB / IG / Threads / X with a 14-day content calendar. Mega-viral validated: 8…

Local-first AI agent workspace for coding, writing, design, research, and automation — one runtime for desktop GUI and TUI.

Open-source AI Agent platform for teams. Your agents don't just chat — they read files, run code, call APIs, and deliver results.

Give your AI agent eyes for PDFs — structured text, tables, OCR, visual evidence, and page-level citations via MCP. Native Rust, local-first.

Real-world AI penetration testing engineer for authorized assessments — built-in cloud module covering AWS/Azure/GCP + Aliyun/Tencent/Huawei clouds. Built on Cl…

OpenGUI is an Android GUI agent framework for phone-use AI that can see, plan, and operate real mobile apps through the GUI.

Tinybot is a lightweight personal AI Agent that is constantly evolving

Goink 桌面 AI 小说创作助手，对话式写作 + 自动状态追踪 + 本地语义搜索。跨平台开箱即用。AI Agent Novel Generator.

Pluggable DeepSeek-colored TUI for DeepSeek Harness

Entity-level git merge driver. Resolves false conflicts git invents when independent agents edit the same file. ~95% reduction vs. line-based merge.

Percho: Minimalist desktop GUI for the Pi coding agent — the same engine as the Pi CLI, in a clean visual interface. Multi-session chat, visual tool approvals,…

Run Claude Code, Codex & Gemini in parallel on Windows & macOS — git worktree fan-out with atomic hunk adoption, approval gates, reboot-surviving sessions

A hierarchical memory framework for personalized presentation agents. Try it at memslides.com.

Real-time multimodal desktop agent evolving toward a persistent AI OS interface (0.1 α).

clawdcursor compiles whatever's on screen into one UI map — accessibility tree and OCR fused into stable, addressable elements, with a screenshot only when need…

Repeatable agentic engineering. The workflow layer that turns AI coding agents into a disciplined factory: durable specs, fresh-context workers, adversarial cro…