LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Use when any bounded workflow starts or reaches an action, path, proposal, or merge boundary. Refuses rather than default-allow on an unreadable constraint set.
Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.
Use when an artifact or skill has just changed and is about to be called done, committed, or handed off. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when the user suspects no installed skill covers a task and wants proof. Names the owning skill or writes a missing-skill brief. Never routes or invokes the matched skill.
Use when a task, feature, or fix is called done, complete, finished, or fixed, or before a commit, PR, or next task. Not for fact-checking: use verify-both-ways. Not for measuring: use verify-this.
Use when the user wants to classify abstractions as useful, bad, or busy and keep one shallow level. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.
Use when a task is ambiguous or intent needs eliciting: exhaustive/collaborative/adversarial askme, batch questions, interview, ambiguity scan, or intent proposal. Not for one fork: use decide.
Use when the user runs /autoplan on a plan or idea. Reviews, amends, and derives task IDs with a final human approval gate. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when asked to park an undecided idea without representing it as decided or active work. Not for decided or active work: use the project task system.
Use when the user wants to collapse an open decision field to one decision and record its rationale locally. Not for multi-lens pressure testing. No remote or irreversible changes.
Use when the user has a fork and wants it resolved and applied, not explored: "decide this", "choose the path", or "decide and fix it".
Use when the user wants the finished-system contract for a piece of work: behavior, protocols, allowed, forbidden, and impossible states with a state-space proof. Not for runtime verification.
Use when the user wants to expand a decision field with additional options and dimensions. Not for selecting or applying an option: use decide. No source or remote-system changes.
Use when the user explicitly requests a Tarot draw or casually delegates an ambiguous choice among multiple valid approaches.
Use when a user wants to define failure states, recovery actions, bypasses, and degraded modes for a component during design. Not for runtime recovery.
Use when a user wants to rebuild a design, organization, or API from primitives. Not for a perspective take: use from-*-perspective seats.
Use when asked to derive the general rule a request carries as examples instead of a stated rule, then bound it. Not for ambiguity in a stated request: use askme. Read-only.
Use when a durable effort needs an approved, checkable success predicate before work starts. Not for requirement-to-evidence ledgers. Never remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible.
Use when defining, revising, or gate-replanning the project structural backbone in project-root graph.yaml. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Use when the user asks to park ideas or inspiration for later. Not for code, backlog, or divergence-class cards, or remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/improve-agent
Improve agent
Improve an existing agent through performance baselines, prompt engineering, A/B testing, and staged rollout
/multi-agent-optimize
Multi agent optimize
Optimize multi-agent system performance through profiling, context window tuning, coordination efficiency, and cost and latency tradeoffs
/team-debug
Team debug
Debug issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation by multiple agents
/team-delegate
Team delegate
Task delegation dashboard for managing team workload, assignments, and rebalancing
/team-feature
Team feature
Develop features in parallel with multiple agents using file ownership boundaries and dependency management
/team-review
Team review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions
/team-shutdown
Team shutdown
Gracefully shut down an agent team, collect final results, and clean up resources
/team-spawn
Team spawn
Spawn an agent team using presets (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration) or custom composition
/team-status
Team status
Display team members, task status, and progress for an active agent team
/api-mock
Api mock
Build realistic API mock servers with request stubbing, dynamic data, test scenarios, and contract testing
/performance-optimization
Performance optimization
Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring
/feature-development
Feature development
Orchestrate end-to-end feature development from requirements to deployment
/block-no-verify
Block no verify
Set up PreToolUse hook to block --no-verify and other git bypass flags in Claude Code projects
/c4-architecture
C4 architecture
Generate comprehensive C4 architecture documentation (Context, Container, Component, Code) for a codebase using bottom-up analysis and four coordinated C4 agents.
/workflow-automate
Workflow automate
Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation
/code-explain
Code explain
Explain complex code, algorithms, and design patterns with step-by-step breakdowns, visual diagrams, and interactive examples
/doc-generate
Doc generate
Generate API, architecture, code, and user documentation from a codebase and automate keeping it current
/context-restore
Context restore
Restore saved project context and decisions to resume a session
/refactor-clean
Refactor clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
/tech-debt
Tech debt
Analyze and remediate technical debt — inventory debt items, score by impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with estimated effort.
Open‑WebUI Tools is a modular toolkit designed to extend and enrich your Open WebUI instance, turning it into a powerful AI workstation. With a suite of over 15…
26 views 0 likesThe token-efficient agentic coding workbench. Built for a future where every token counts — it optimizes token usage at the agent-loop level, saving 70%+ on lon…
16 views 0 likesMCP server for controlling a real iPhone via macOS iPhone Mirroring...and any MacOs app. Screenshot, tap, swipe, type — from any MCP client.
10 views 0 likesOne desktop for all your AI coding Agent — Claude Code, Codex CLI & Gemini CLI. Auto-detect, one-click install, unified chat, file explorer, terminal & editor.…
21 views 0 likesPi — A cross-platform AI coding agent, bringing the Claude Code experience to your desktop. No environment setup, no terminal commands. Download and start codin…
12 views 0 likesDeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…
13 views 0 likesA telegram bot for searching and auto-saving.
13 views 0 likes金蝶云星空 K3Cloud MCP Server,让 AI 助手(Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、Cline、Cherry Studio、Openclaw 等任意支持 MCP 协议的客户端)通过自然语言查询和操作金蝶 ERP 系统。
19 views 0 likesRewrite frontier research using allegorical structural mapping.
13 views 0 likesFree4Chat is a temporary collaboration fabric for Humans and Agents.
11 views 0 likesGive any AI agent a full desktop — it sees the screen, clicks, types, and runs apps like a human. Automate anything with a UI: browsers, legacy software, intern…
11 views 0 likesA personal AI agent that can work safely on your machine, remember useful context, and keep its data under your control.
11 views 0 likesA framework for AI-driven economic activity. Declarative, composable, observable, deterministic.
12 views 0 likesOpen-source, self-hosted customer support desk in a single binary. A lightweight alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Chatwoot.
13 views 0 likes54 rigorous skills for Codex, OpenCode, and Pi: code review, security audit, feature development, frontend design, MCP tools, Hugging Face ML/training, and more…
18 views 0 likesA wonderful list of Game Development resources.
11 views 0 likesOpen Science Desktop — local-first, model-agnostic AI research workbench for macOS, Windows & Linux. Open-source Claude Science desktop alternative built on Tau…
11 views 0 likesLexora — Personal AI workspace built around Desktop / 以 Desktop 为核心的个人 AI 工作台
11 views 0 likesOpen-source, AI-native Evernote alternative with native MCP. Zero-cost on Cloudflare or self-hosted with Docker.
11 views 0 likesFull job-hunt Claude skill bundle — Job Description decoder + Resume builder (11 templates) + Behavioral Interview / story bank. Three self-contained sub-skills…
11 views 0 likes