LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Export a page or set of pages

What is missing from my understanding

Export the graph for outside analysis

Report the shape of the graph

Prepare a handoff brief

Quick health check

Find pages that swallowed the graph

Rebuild the index

Import an exported chat history

Ingest book or article highlights

Ingest your own finished work

Ingest newsletters without duplicating

Ingest an academic paper

Ingest a PDF

Clip and ingest a web page

Ingest a voice note

Ingest a video or podcast transcript

Ingest new material from raw/ into the wiki

Scaffold a new vault

Install the skills, commands and agents

Persistent session memory for AI coding agents — local-first, with on-device inference, associative recall, and drift detection. Works with Claude Code, Cursor,…

Run Hermes Agent and OpenClaw on the same WeChat account

An AI co-scientist running on your desktop. Claude Science but better.

Emotion Ball 是一套面向 AI 助手的表情引擎:32 种状态表情全部由纯 SVG 与原生 JavaScript 实时驱动,零框架、零图片资源。AI 侧只需输出一个 emotionId,小球即可切换到对应表情,可直接用作聊天机器人、桌面宠物、悬浮助手的情绪表达层。

Agent communication SDK. The open-source agent communication layer for AI agents — email, WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, Telegram, SMS. Python & TypeScript.

The micro-VM for AI agents — light enough to embed on your laptop, elastic enough to power an agentic cloud.

Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.

Webhook integration skills for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot). Step-by-step guidance for setting up webhook receivers, signature verification,…

Token burn reducer and focus keeper for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Gemini CLI, and more: surgical read hints, PDF/Office/CSV/markdown file interception, 160+…

RuvNet Brain — a downloadable, source-grounded brain for Claude Code over Reuven Cohen's (rUv's) RuvNet stack: RuVector/RVF, Ruflo, AgentDB, RuLake, SPARC + 21…

💼 One MCP server to search job boards and company career sites

C++ MCP SDK - build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients in C++ / CPP. Enterprise-grade security, observability, connectivity. Stdio, HTTP+SSE, Stre…

Open-Source AI Presentation Generator and API (Gamma, Canva, Beautiful AI, Decktopus, Presentations AI Alternative)

Secure, Fast, and Extensible Sandbox runtime for AI agents.

Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.

Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.

The World's First Agentic IDE. Visual dashboard: live sessions, task management, code editor, terminal. Epic Swarm parallel workflows. Auto-proceed rules. Autom…

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

Terminal Director. One lightweight app, eight features, your whole dev workflow in a single window.

AI turns documents or topics into real, native PowerPoint decks—with native shapes, transitions and animations, data-backed charts and tables on demand, audio n…