LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Commit changes with festival traceability metadata

Create a new festival, phase, sequence, or task

List all festivals with their status and completion percentage

Get the next actionable festival task with full context

Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view)

Show festival progress and current status

Learn about the Festival Methodology (concepts, structure, rules, and workflows)

Validate festival structure and find issues

Turn one sentence of intent into a structured plan, sized correctly and planned through the loop

Canonical reference for invoking `agentii-investment-intelligence` slash commands across Claude Code, OpenCode, Goose, Codex, OpenClaw, and Claude Cowork. Frozen at v1.0 per the mode-addressability syntax + Round 4 Q12.

Operational KPI dashboard — headcount trends, utilization rates, backlog/book-to-bill

Revenue decomposition — segment breakdown, geographic split, product-line waterfall

Unit economics analysis — CAC/LTV estimation, churn inference, gross margin per unit

What-if scenario analysis — scenario tree construction (bear/base/bull), sensitivity to macro variables

Business model classification and structural analysis — product/service/platform, distribution channels, revenue composition, market sizing

Competitive landscape analysis — peer positioning, market-share dynamics, moat assessment

Earnings sentiment analysis — analyst estimates vs. guidance, sentiment trends, surprise history

Growth strategy analysis — organic/inorganic growth decomposition, pipeline analysis, execution tracking

Recent quarter performance analysis — quarterly P&L, margin drivers, EPS, sequential momentum

Risk analysis — regulatory, competitive, macro, and technology risk assessment

Offline-first Python AI agent that runs a tiny research business: quotes each job against its own costs, collects via Stripe, fulfils with NVIDIA Nemotron, pays…

DSH 插件 · 注入式优化器 0.8（主线）：你照常说话，它在你发送后,AI接收前把"这一轮到底要什么"理清楚，再把这份理解交给工作 AI(上下文注入) —— 原话不改写，条条带逐字依据。含控制界面（档位/权限/模型/上下文/只读工具）、拦截浮层（思维层+产出层）与真实 token 用量。可明显提升大多数模型的发挥稳…

Reliable AI Skill + MCP toolkit for agent-driven desktop CAD automation.

Curated real-world use cases for Hermes Agent — the self-improving AI agent from Nous Research. Backed by primary sources.

AI Agent 教学仓库 | 系统化 LangChain、RAG、LangGraph、MCP 全栈实战代码 | 万字博客详解 | 开源可运行示例 | 从零构建智能体

从 0 复刻 WorkBuddy-style 桌面 AI 助手 Harness：24 章 Python 教程，覆盖 Agent Loop、工具调用、记忆系统、Sidecar、沙盒审计、DeepSeek/OpenAI 评测轨迹

MCP server and CLI tools for web search and crawling, built on SearXNG and Crawl4AI

Delta MCP is a free app that sits between your AI apps and their MCP servers: one program per task instead of one tool call per step, up to 24.1× fewer tokens i…

Ava turns any Android 5+ device into a voice-first Home Assistant kiosk. Native C++ under the hood, so a 10-year-old tablet still listens, talks, and runs the h…

Roblox Studio macOS Window Capture Fix 2026: Real Screenshot Tool Instead of Magenta Playtest Glitch

LabTether