LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Shows status of the Supabase local development stack.

Stops the Supabase local development stack.

Manage vanity subdomains for Supabase projects.

Configure Tavily MCP server credentials

Run Rigor Explore on top of current_research using the current compatible slug.

Run Rigor Reproduce on this repository using the current compatible slug.

Run Rigor Analyze on this repository using the current compatible slug.

Run Rigor Debug on a research repository failure before patching.

Runs the Open Steps install check and reads the result back in plain words. Use it after installing the pack, when a report never appears, or when someone asks whether the install is sound. The script does the checking and sets the exit code. This command reports what the script printed and nothing else.

`crabbox exec` executes a command on a supported existing lease without syncing files,

List the preflight names accepted by this installed Crabbox binary, their

Редакторский аудит русского текста без переписывания

Редактура русского текста с сохранением смысла и голоса автора

Run every objective gate this project can prove and report the real N/N. Use before claiming any screen or component is done.

Create API connector tools for AG2 agents with auth handling, pagination, rate limiting, and error mapping

Create a multi-agent group chat with AG2 using configurable speaker selection patterns

Scaffold an A2A-compliant AG2 agent with server wiring, card settings, and skill definitions

Scaffold a new AG2 ConversableAgent with tool functions, system prompt, and LLM config

Create a tool function for an AG2 agent with type annotations, docstrings, and JSON return contracts

Create a sequential multi-agent pipeline where each agent processes and passes results to the next

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Automatic memory consolidation for OpenClaw agents — like sleep for your AI. Powered by MyClaw.ai

🗂 The essential checklist for modern web development, for humans and AI agents

Distribb CLI, Claude, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw skill for AI-powered SEO. Write content with your own AI, publish through Distribb's backlink network.

Open-source AI browser agent — type plain-language commands and Bah operates the web for you. Works with cloud AI (DeepSeek, Mistral, NVIDIA) or local Ollama mo…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

Use your ChatGPT / Codex subscription with DeepSeek Harness via OAuth, with model access, usage quotas, search, and image generation — no API key or Codex CLI r…

Local-first A-share research workbench for DeepSeek Harness: market dashboards, watchlists, valuation, four investor agents, versioned reports, and continuous p…

Open-source video pipeline (clipper, AI video & more) — scout trends, clip long videos, generate captioned shorts, design motion graphics. Local-first, BYOK. AG…

Desktop app for the pi coding agent: streaming timeline, Git review with hunk staging, session tree, native UI for pi extensions. Windows · macOS · Linux. pi 编程…

Zero-dependency browser video editor that AI agents can drive — JSON timeline, MCP + REST, live-reloading UI

Personal Context Manager for Claude Code. Your life in walnuts.

Fast way to switch between Claude Code configuration profiles

AutoClip｜一个链接，一键出片。开源 AI 视频剪辑桌面工具，将播客、访谈、课程等长视频自动剪成短视频，生成字幕、封面和发布文案，适配抖音、小红书、TikTok、Reels 与 YouTube Shorts。Open-source AI video clipping & content repurposing.