LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

One-screen inventory of skills, agents, commands, MCP servers, and hooks counts.

List the file-based memory store grouped by project (auto-memory) plus the CLAUDE.md files.

Show current Claude Code spend versus a budget number

Quick month-end spend projection from the daily trend

List the most expensive sessions pushing your spend up

Print the Agent Monitor dashboard URL and how to start/open it

Check Agent Monitor reachability and print UP/DOWN with latency

One-line Agent Monitor health + counts summary from /api/stats

Quick connectivity + health probe of the Agent Monitor dashboard.

Export Agent Monitor data (sessions/events/analytics/costs/all) as json/csv/md.

Show the latest N ingested events with timestamp, event_type, and tool_name.

List current cost and token outlier sessions via z-score

Compare two sessions side-by-side with cost and workflow deltas

Surface the top 3 data-backed insights about your Claude Code usage right now

Read-only inventory of CCAM alerts, webhook targets, and remote sources

CCAM platform status across hooks, config, updates, and MCP prerequisites

One-screen focus snapshot — avg turn duration, thinking-block usage, and longest sessions.

Quick daily standup from today's Claude Code sessions — grouped by project, with cost and errors.

Suggest the next action from your most recent in-progress sessions and recent errors.

List the most recent APIError events with their session and a summary

AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart search by use case, content remix, sample images.

嘉立创EDA专业版(EasyEDA Pro)自动化：给 AI harness 装上画板的「手」—— 一套 typed 原理图/PCB 动作，CLI / Agent Skill / stdio MCP 三形态融合接入。承接嘉立创「不以卖板赚钱，以培养中国工程师为己任」 | EasyEDA Pro automation:…

Claude Code session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.claude/projects. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, and live tail sessions on desktop, web, and TUI.

Shared memory MCP server — persistent, searchable, cross-client Claude, Opencode

OpenAI Codex CLI session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.codex/sessions. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, collaboration chains, and live sessions on d…

High-performance Google Drive CLI and Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for LLM/AI agents. Natively execute Google Apps Script (GAS) under a secure whiteliste…

"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"

Local-first chat history analyzer with AI. | 本地优先的 AI 聊天记录分析工具

Official Oxylabs MCP integration

Persistent memory for Claude Code & Codex CLI. Auto-extracted knowledge graph, multi-representation embeddings, 3D WebGL visualization. LongMemEval R@5=97.45%.…

One person, a team of agents. Multi-session CLI that collaborates across terminals; /goal keeps long tasks running; WeChat/WeCom/Feishu gateway lets you call th…

AI 基础知识 - GPU 架构、CUDA 编程、大模型基础及AI Agent 相关知识。

Self-hosted, open-source agent skill registry for enterprises. Publish & version skill packages, govern with RBAC and audit logs, deploy on-premise with Docke…

深度调研报告生成 Skill — 一条命令，十分钟出券商级深度调研报告 / Professional deep research report generation Skill · Supports 19 languages

The OKF toolkit for Claude Code — author, maintain, validate & visualize Open Knowledge Format bundles. Plugin, agent skills, and a GitHub Action.

Autonomous AI pentesting agents — real-time reconnaissance, vulnerability detection, and exploitation orchestration. Go + TypeScript.

Native macOS and iOS App for the Hermes AI agent — multi-window, multi-server (local + remote over SSH). Chat, dashboard, sessions, memory, cron, MCP, and more.

Multiplayer Claude Code and Codex. Self-hosted team workspace for Claude Code and Codex. Multi-user, browser-based, AI mates with memory.

Every past session, subagent, and workflow -- queryable by your agent, browsable by you

盯盘侠 PanWatch · 自托管 AI 盯盘助手，集成 TradingAgents 多 Agent 投资决策 | A股/港股/美股实时监控、持仓管理、智能分析、全渠道推送