LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Iniciar planificación de archivos estilo Manus. Crear task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md para tareas complejas.

Bridge Claude Code's /goal to the active plan. Derives a goal condition from task_plan.md and invokes /goal so Claude keeps working until the plan is complete. Available since v2.38.0.

Run a planning-aware cadence with Claude Code's /loop. Default tick checks plan status, runs check-complete, nudges progress.md update if stalled. Available since v2.38.0.

启动 Manus 风格的文件规划。为复杂任务创建 task_plan.md、findings.md、progress.md。

啟動 Manus 風格的檔案規劃。為複雜任務建立 task_plan.md、findings.md、progress.md。

Start Manus-style file-based planning. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md for complex tasks.

Short alias for /plan. Starts Manus-style file-based planning: task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md. Available since v3.0.0.

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls. Now with automatic session recovery after /clear

Show current planning status at a glance - phases, progress, and any logged errors.

Run three-agent adversarial analysis -- advocate builds the case, adversary challenges it, judicial analyst synthesizes

Structured pre-execution briefing session -- collects case context through specialist panel, builds execution plan, supports resume and depth control

Analyze cantonal law for all 26 Swiss cantons -- cantonal court decisions, cantonal legislation, procedural specifics, and interaction with federal law

Validate, format, and look up Swiss legal citations including BGE/ATF/DTF decisions and statutory references

Create a reusable custom workflow by combining BetterCallClaude agents. Interview-based: pick agents, order them, define the output. Saved for future use with /bettercallclaude:workflow.

Analyze Swiss legal documents -- identify legal issues, extract key clauses, verify citations, and assess compliance

Diagnose MCP server connectivity — tests each server, reports status and impact in plain language, suggests fixes for issues.

Draft Swiss legal documents including contracts (OR), court submissions (ZPO), and legal opinions (Gutachten) with multi-lingual support

Force Federal Law Mode for Swiss federal legal analysis, overriding cantonal auto-detection

Show complete BetterCallClaude command reference, available agents, skills, and usage examples

Execute the BetterCallClaude 5-step Swiss legal framework: intake → research → strategy → adversarial → draft. A complete end-to-end pipeline for any Swiss legal matter, from document analysis through final legal output.

An open-source, privacy-first, self-hosted knowledge workspace where humans and AI agents work together 开源、隐私优先、自托管的知识工作空间，让人与智能体在此协作

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

The go-to web for your AI coding agent — local-first search, fetch, crawl & research over MCP. No API keys, no cloud, $0/query. Public beta.

Transform and optimize your markdown documentation for Large Language Models (LLMs) and RAG systems. Generate llms.txt automatically.

合乎周礼：DeepSeek-powered Zhouli-style Chinese translator, web app, and distributable Skill package.

This is a fork of the https://dockbox.dev project I made

🏆 Curated, ranked list of AI agent harnesses (100+) — plus an MCP server, llms.txt & JSON so agents can recommend them too. Rescored weekly.

A Python framework for modular, self-contained skill management for machines.

ADHD — a skill for coding agents. Tree-of-thought with pruning, built on the Claude & Codex Agent SDK. Fans out parallel divergent thoughts under different cogn…

AI Agent 驱动的开源可自部署视频工作台：将小说与剧本转为角色、场景、道具资产、分镜、视频和剪映草稿，支持跨镜头一致性、多供应商与费用追踪 | Self-hosted AI video workspace for stories, storyboards and short-form video producti…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop App: a local AI desktop workspace for DSH Sessions, projects, files, web research, plugins, and Office artifacts.

Autonomous Offensive Security, Bug Bounty & Red Teaming Agent Framework powered by Hermes Agent, specialized reasoning skills, and multi-model LLM orchestration…

⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in

Supercharge AI Agents, Safely

X (Twitter) Scraper API and X API Alternative. You do not need an official X developer account. You do not need to connect or use an X account for supported scr…

My AI Stand. Realtime by day, rewriting itself by night. Summon my AI superpower.

Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.

观澜 / Guanlan：AI Agent 的中文互联网研究、阅读与信源路由工具。

Mac Agent for macOS 26: the agentic AI harness for your Mac Desktop. Computer use, automation, scripting, coding, and more. Powered by 18+ providers across loca…

Semantic version control => entity-level diffs, blame, and impact analysis on top of git. 28 languages via tree-sitter. Built for coding agents.