LLM Mart Basic

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when looking for meaningfully duplicated logic in a codebase, especially duplicate behavior hidden behind different names, different syntax, different control flow, or independently evolved implementations. Not for style issues, not for syntactic clone detection

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetratio

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that repo

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Turn a GAIA workflow misfire into a redacted, classified, filing-ready bug report in one read-only pass. Self-diagnoses config issues inline; files probable bugs upstream on confirmation.

Judge-the-form, human-gated hardening. Reviews recurring code-audit-frontend findings and, with approval, drafts the lowest-context-weight form (deterministic check / skill / path-scoped prose rule) into the working tree. Pass `list` to see live candidates or `why <finding_class>` to explain one.

Initialize a new project from the GAIA React template, renames, strips GAIA branding, configures i18n, installs Claude skills/plugins.

Plan a complex feature using GAIA's task-orchestration pattern, structures the work into fresh-context subagent phases for your approval. Does not implement.

Cut a new GAIA release, bump version, graduate CHANGELOG, regenerate manifest, open release PR, then tag on merge. Maintainer-only.

Detect and, on explicit consent, additively append the languages Serena is not indexing to the `languages:` list in `.serena/project.yml`, then prompt a Serena restart. Never mutates without a yes; inert without Serena.

Author an immutable SPEC artifact through Socratic discovery (spec-kit wrapper), then STOP. Terminal, never runs /gaia-plan; it prints a /gaia-plan prompt the human pastes into a fresh session. Pass `auto <description>` for non-interactive mode that answers its own questions.

Maintainer-only autonomous health audit + auto-heal loop. Runs N=3 fresh-team audit-fix-audit cycles with circuit breakers, reports an F-to-A+ verdict (folding in the shared Claude-integration fitness grade) or escalates.

Single post-init onboarding command; detects situation, runs only owed phases; safe to re-run. --reconfigure rotates token and re-selects tools.

GAIA before_specify hook: constitution placeholder check + spec-kit version-pin drift detection.

GAIA after_specify hook: immutability lint over the just-written SPEC artifact.

Close a plan after implementation+merge. Offers wiki-promote for the plan's consolidated SUMMARY.md, cold-consolidates an out-of-band merge, then early-reaps the local plan folder once cost is represented in cost.jsonl.

GAIA self-review: pre-gate-2 review pass on the in-progress SPEC draft.

Close a SPEC after implementation+merge. Optional drain of deferred wiki-promote, cold-consolidates an out-of-band merge into SUMMARY.md, then early-reaps the local SPEC folder once cost is represented in cost.jsonl.

GAIA Socratic discovery wrapper: /speckit-specify for the initial draft, then GAIA's own Socratic clarify loop.

GAIA before_implement hook: render PO-authored UATs into Playwright e2e specs at .playwright/e2e/spec-NNN/.

Promote merged SPEC or plan content into the GAIA wiki.

This project uses the GAIA preset. Bare `/speckit-clarify` is not the clarify path here: core clarify writes an off-shape artifact (a `## Clarifications` / `### Session` block with five-word answers) and carries a question cap GAIA does not use. Run `/gaia-spec` instead — it driv

GAIA-wrapped /speckit-specify: writes through core, then relocates the artifact to .gaia/local/specs/SPEC-NNN/SPEC.md and stamps GAIA frontmatter.

Show or configure the compact Fallow Impact statusline in Claude Code

Open-source super AI assistant & Agent Harness. Plans tasks, runs tools and skills, self-evolves with memory and knowledge. Multi-model, multi-channel. Lightwei…

Open-source AI browser agent for web automation: a web browsing agent and computer-use agent in plain English. Browser MCP for Claude Code and Gemini CLI.

Agent-native trading terminal built on DeepSeek Harness. Crypto, US, CN and HK in one three-column GUI, 19+ hot-swappable connectors, dry-run by default with hu…

Open-source desktop and web coding agent with a first-party host and harness, durable sessions, model connections, streaming chat, and workspace tools.

OrcaReplay — Time travel for AI agents. Record, replay, fork, and debug any agent run with any model. Built by the OrcaRouter.ai team.

A complete toolkit for connecting R and LLMs

OpenSRE — the memory-first AI SRE. Self-hosted incident investigation with episodic memory, knowledge graph, web console, Slack & Teams. opensre.in

A desktop AI coding assistant that works with your local projects. Ally helps you understand code, edit files, search a workspace, manage tasks, and complete de…

【在线免费使用】 简单快速将SQL或DBML转换为美观的ER图（支持 Agent Skill）/ The best SQL to ER Diagram converter (Support Agent Skill).

Operation-bound protection for autonomous AI agents: contain and verify operations before committing changes, understand intent and risk across long-running wor…

Local-first AI coding agent desktop: Electron + Rust host core + pi Agent Harness + user-installable plugins

Local-only Go static analysis engine with a built-in MCP server. Gives AI coding agents deterministic structural awareness: call graphs, impact analysis, symbol…

Self-hosted AI agent workspace with tool calling, MCP, multi-model routing, sandboxed execution, multi-agent workflows, and LLM-authored 3D character animation…

Automated TDD enforcement for Claude Code

High-performance platform for building websites, e-commerce, and web applications—with Native AI, JavaScript development, and a marketplace for portable sites a…

Autonomous AI-agent orchestration engine for job discovery with decision traces, tool adapters, and production-grade run control.

Token efficient Claude Code full Python rebuild. AI Coding Agent in 310K LoC Python.

OPC — One Person Company. A full team in a single Claude Code skill. Adaptive agent orchestrator with 21 built-in roles, 6 flow templates, and adversarial quali…

Open-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.

MCP server for AI-powered GitHub project management — agent orchestration, PRD-to-issues pipeline, sprint planning, and multi-agent swarm coordination