LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene
EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su
Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module
Cut a paad release — pick the semver bump from what is in [Unreleased], run make release, merge, tag, and verify the published plugin
Read the feature roadmap, find the next unplanned phase, brainstorm it, and update the roadmap with the resulting document name
Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o
Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n
Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.
Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when working the project-wide out-of-scope backlog at paad/code-reviews/backlog.md — cleaning it of entries that are already fixed or gone, or picking the next entry and fixing it end-to-end. Not for producing backlog entries — that is /agentic-review — and not
Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a paad/architecture-reviews/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w
Use when creating or updating a Makefile for a project, especially when standard targets (build, test, lint, format, etc.) are missing or when modifying targets that may already be wired into other tooling. Not for debugging why a build fails.
Use when the user asks which paad skills exist, what a paad skill does, which one fits their situation, or how to invoke one — including "what can paad do", "list the paad skills", "is there a paad skill for X", or a request for the arguments of a named paad skill
Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene
EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su
Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module
Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/lookup-config
Lookup config
Search for configuration items (assets) in ConnectWise PSA
/schedule-entry
Schedule entry
Create a schedule entry/appointment in ConnectWise PSA
/search-tickets
Search tickets
Search for tickets in ConnectWise PSA by various criteria
/update-ticket
Update ticket
Update fields on an existing ConnectWise PSA ticket
/search-surveys
Search surveys
Search recent Crewhu surveys, surfacing detractors and promoters
/error-budget
Error budget
Run the reliability scorecard for one service, or every connected service if omitted - error-budget burn rate where an SLO is defined, trend reporting otherwise
/oncall-brief
Oncall brief
Generate the current on-call handoff brief - what's paging, what's escalated without an owner, last-shift history, and known-flaky alerts to watch
/postmortem
Postmortem
Draft a blameless postmortem for a given incident (by ID or name), or the most recent significant incident within a time window
/device-inventory
Device inventory
List all devices at a Domotz-monitored site
/device-lookup
Device lookup
Find a Domotz device by name, IP address, or MAC address
/site-overview
Site overview
Overview of a Domotz site's network health
/check-threat
Check threat
Pull full detail for one Checkpoint Harmony Email detection and the message behind it
/release-quarantine
Release quarantine
Restore quarantined mail to its recipients in Checkpoint Harmony Email, with task polling
/search-quarantine
Search quarantine
Find messages in Checkpoint Harmony Email by sender, subject, attachment hash or quarantine state
/search-threats
Search threats
Sweep security events in Checkpoint Harmony Email by type, state, severity and date range
/campaign-summary
Campaign summary
Get summary of recent phishing and training campaigns from KnowBe4
/group-report
Group report
Get security awareness metrics for a KnowBe4 group
/phishing-results
Phishing results
View phishing campaign results and click rates from KnowBe4
/training-status
Training status
Check training completion status for users or groups in KnowBe4
/user-risk
User risk
Get risk score and risk history for a KnowBe4 user
Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…
3 views 0 likesA curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.
3 views 0 likes🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…
3 views 0 likesWebextension tool for Odoo
3 views 0 likes基于多模态视觉感知与 LLM Agent 的 macOS 微信自动化框架 | Visual RPA for WeChat
0 views 0 likesThe operational superset of Pi Coding Agent — everything Pi, plus observability, governance, recovery, evaluation and multi-agent orchestration. Pi Coding Agent…
0 views 0 likesMetrik 可以集中查看本机多个 Agent 的配额余量和 Token 消耗,目前支持 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等主流 AI 服务。
0 views 0 likesAn AI agent with a real self — soul she wrote, desires that drive her, a heartbeat for autonomous action, dreams she processes when you're away. Capability supe…
0 views 0 likesProduction-ready open source terminal coding agent with readable, layered code: permission rules, OS sandboxing, MCP, skills, sub-agents, and Anthropic, OpenAI-…
0 views 0 likesAnswer me with HTML — an agent skill that answers hard questions with a one-page HTML you can actually read. 让 AI Agent 用一页 HTML 回答复杂问题。
1 views 0 likesPrompt packs that make any AI agent a LaTeX expert — fix errors, polish writing, format for venues, read papers, recover source
1 views 0 likesClaude Code plugin: universal radial-tree exploration engine. One tree skill + swappable presets (brainstorm / attack / design / code-audit) for divergent ideat…
1 views 0 likesClaude Code + OpenClaw + Codex + WorkBuddy 中文教程 | 50篇完整教程 + 1张速查卡 | 80万+内容量 | 1500+实操示例 | AI Coding / Agent 四线学习路径(编程+助手+Agent+办公)
1 views 0 likesSmartLabelBench 2026: LLM-Powered Auto Annotation and Dataset Builder for Everything
1 views 0 likes从零开始玩转OpenClaw:最全面的中文教程,涵盖安装、配置、实战案例和避坑指南(github版)
1 views 0 likesNative Android GUI for running AI coding agents locally on-device. No terminal or PC required.
0 views 0 likes基于 LangChain/LangGraph 的 ReAct Agent ,结合 RAG、工具调用与 Streamlit 界面,面向智能客服与报告生成场景。
0 views 0 likesAn open-source, local-first AI learning workbench
2 views 0 likesOpen-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.
2 views 0 likesMatt Pocock 技能集的中文翻译版 — 地道中文,原汁原味的技术术语。基于 mattpocock/skills 复刻。每日中午12点钟同步
2 views 0 likes