LLM Mart Basic

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Cut a paad release — pick the semver bump from what is in [Unreleased], run make release, merge, tag, and verify the published plugin

Read the feature roadmap, find the next unplanned phase, brainstorm it, and update the roadmap with the resulting document name

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and n

Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking cod

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when working the project-wide out-of-scope backlog at paad/code-reviews/backlog.md — cleaning it of entries that are already fixed or gone, or picking the next entry and fixing it end-to-end. Not for producing backlog entries — that is /agentic-review — and not

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a paad/architecture-reviews/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when a session is running out of context and the work needs to continue in a fresh one, or when starting a session meant to pick up where an earlier one stopped. Not for compacting in place — that is /compact — and not for specifying work that has not started, w

Use when creating or updating a Makefile for a project, especially when standard targets (build, test, lint, format, etc.) are missing or when modifying targets that may already be wired into other tooling. Not for debugging why a build fails.

Use when the user asks which paad skills exist, what a paad skill does, which one fits their situation, or how to invoke one — including "what can paad do", "list the paad skills", "is there a paad skill for X", or a request for the arguments of a named paad skill

Use when reviewing a spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design plan before implementation begins — especially when the doc feels too big, bundles unrelated features, may contradict the current codebase, or seems vague, infeasible, or thin on security and error handling. Not for cros

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for gene

EXPERIMENTAL. Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test su

Use when making a small, quick change — a bug fix, typo, minor feature, tweak, or anything the user calls "vibe coding" — that looks like 1-3 files in the same module

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, o

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Run an organic-social (ECHO) workflow: channel portfolio and voice dossiers, platform-native content and calendars, the social-quality gate with a pre-publish go/no-go, community/inbox/crisis operations, and the listening/SOV/dark-social measurement loop. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.

Route meeting-recall questions to the right Minutes MCP tool.

Prepare a sourced Minutes meeting outcome for human-governed closeout of existing X1 work. Use when the user wants a meeting decision or commitment to close, defer, escalate, or retire a specific X1 coordination thread. Never use it to infer settlement, move money, contact anyone, or close X1 work automatically.

Route meeting-recall questions to the right Minutes MCP tool.

Prepare a sourced Minutes meeting outcome for human-governed closeout of existing X1 work. Use when the user wants a meeting decision or commitment to close, defer, escalate, or retire a specific X1 coordination thread. Never use it to infer settlement, move money, contact anyone, or close X1 work automatically.

`crabbox capacity [--json]` reports the authenticated owner's current admission

Code review the current proposed code change

Resolve a merge conflict

Code review for pull request $1

Six Thinking Hats Analysis

Slash commands shipped by the plugin. Portable framework commands work in any Claude Code session; the workflow commands embed one author's personal setup and are opt-in - see [Adapting for your workflow](../README.md#adapting-for-your-workflow) before relying on them. Back to th

Autonomous fix loop for failing CI on the repo's default branch

Autonomous PR fixing loop - iterates on CI failures and review comments until green

GitHub-issue marathon - triage open issues, then run agent-ready ones to merge with Agent Teams

Example Marathon Configuration for CLAUDE.md - copy the section below into your project's CLAUDE.md

Task Master - plan, start, review, and close

Deep understanding mode (nemawashi) - exhaustive context-gathering before action

Searches Burp Suite project files for security analysis

Detects timing side-channels in cryptographic code

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes

Atom Agent, Open-Source Governed AI Agent Platform for Self-Hosted Automation

The agent engineering intelligence harness, optimized tools, memory system, subagents and mixture of models packages ⚚

Sesori iOS/Android app and the Sesori Bridge CLI — drive Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, Pi, OMP, Hermes coding sessions from your phone

🧠 RepoBrain (formerly Antigravity) — Give your repo a brain. ChatGPT for your codebase: works in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf & more.

Use ChatGPT (Codex), Claude, and Grok (X Premium) subscriptions as DeepSeek Harness LLM providers — OAuth login in the web UI, no API keys

Latitude is the open-source AI monitoring platform.

Open-source AI browser agent for Chrome and Firefox (monorepo) 🧠

Official Model Studio CLI（阿里云百炼 CLI）built for AI Agent frameworks, exposing models, search, multimodal, and workflow capabilities as structured tool calls.

Curated DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugins, extensions, tools, skills, clients, runtimes, integrations, and verified references — English and Chinese.

Turn papers, code, and docs into presentation-ready, natively editable PPTX in Codex / Claude Code. Native charts and equations, speaker notes, click-build anim…

Grix : Work with agents like talking to people.

Local First Ai Agent. Optimized for Local Ai models. Long context window. Proper tools callings. Runs privately on your device.

Model Context Protocol server that integrates AgentQL's data extraction capabilities.

AI that ships your tickets.

Metadata-driven CLI for AI Agent Bots — 48 operations across 7 domains, structured JSON envelope I/O, zero interactive prompts.

An open-source, extensible, self-hosted agent workspace with multi-runtime support for Codex, Claude Code, and more, plus reusable local apps for custom interfa…

Open-source Windows desktop client and GUI for DeepSeek Harness — zero-setup installer with Codex, plugins, skills, SSH, mobile remote access, and 11 skins.

The open-source AI workbench for scientific research

DeepSeek-native AI coding agent for your terminal. Engineered around prefix-cache stability — leave it running.

A Fully free agentic browser driver for AI , few tools, full control, real stealth, top-tier token efficiency.