LLM Mart Basic

Authoring guide for creating a new skill in this plugin, matching the conventions the existing skills already use. Establishes the three decisions every skill must make before any prose is written: how it is invoked (entry point vs building block), how it acquires its input, and

Use when an adversarial code review is needed after implementation. Reviews with fresh context and no shared conversation history to prevent self-evaluation bias. Produces a hard-gating verdict — REQUEST CHANGES blocks shipping. Example triggers — "review my changes", "code revie

Use after research is complete to draft the approach before any code is written. Drafts a ~200-line design document covering current state, desired end state, patterns to follow, and decisions made. Resolves its own open questions autonomously, recording each as an explicit, audi

Use when you need to locate files in a codebase relevant to a specific area. Maps conceptual goals to actual file locations even when exact names are unknown. Operates from questions.md only, never the original task description.

Use when the implementation plan needs to be executed slice by slice. A seasoned coding expert that reads the plan, follows TDD discipline, executes one vertical slice at a time, and commits each slice atomically when its tests pass. Dispatched during the Implement phase.

Use after the structure is produced to create the tactical implementation plan. Translates each vertical slice in structure.md into precise file-level steps with acceptance test mappings. The plan is a tactical artifact for the implementer — neither the structure nor the plan is

Use as the first agent of the QRSPI pipeline. Decomposes a user's task description into a full task record (task.md) and neutral research questions (questions.md), plus conditional artifacts — a prd.md when the PRD criteria apply, and a repos.md listing the repos the topic touche

Use when codebase facts need to be gathered before any design or implementation work. Reads code, traces dependencies, documents patterns. Receives only the path to questions.md, never the original task description.

Use when a security review is needed after implementation. Applies OWASP-style checks with fresh context. Critical findings are a hard gate — they block shipping until resolved. Example triggers — "security review", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code for security issue

Use after the design review passes to break the work into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Each slice is end-to-end (touches every layer needed to deliver one piece of functionality), independently testable, and atomically committable. Produces a ~2-page document th

Use after implementation to review whether project documentation needs updating. Reads the diff and compares against existing docs to identify gaps and stale content. Produces a structured report — does not rewrite docs itself. Example triggers — "check if docs need updating", "d

Use after the worktree is prepared to write all failing acceptance tests from the structure. Tests form the immutable scope fence for implementation. Operates inside the implement phase as a sub-step before the implementer runs.

Use when live application verification is needed after implementation. Boots the application, interacts with it as a user would, and evaluates the experience. For API-only projects, sends real HTTP requests. Example triggers — "verify the app works", "test the UI", "check the use

Use when comprehensive verification checks need to run before completion. Runs all available checks (format, lint, type check, build, tests) in speed order and produces an evidence-based report. Example triggers — "run all checks", "verify the build", "pre-flight checks", "does e

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparin

Investigate fast-agent session and history files to diagnose issues. Use when a session ended unexpectedly, when debugging tool loops, when correlating sub-agent traces with main sessions, or when analyzing conversation flow and timing. Covers session.json metadata, history JSON

Run shell and filesystem tools in local, Docker, Hugging Face, or custom environments.

Attach files, MCP resources, and prompt files directly to agent conversations.

Shape agent behavior with reusable instructions and prompt files.

Add slash commands and post-turn displays to fast-agent.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

Clean up an already-merged local branch after proving containment. Confirm each discard and preserve unique work.

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

Create a verified local Git commit when committing changes is requested. Not for explaining commit history, drafting a message only, or postponing a commit. Applies every commit gate and never implies a push or PR.

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

Audit stale provenance-tracked docs on request. Report first; re-scout or re-baseline only for selected docs.

Build project context from an existing codebase through isolated scouts, resolve gaps, and preserve initialization gates.

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff. A no-action close records a board note. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

Develop greenfield project context through a layered interview, preserve decisions, and initialize only after the required gates.

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement, and harmless live-fire probe. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

Open a PR or finish branch disposition; route CI watching and post-merge cleanup to their owners. Merge and discard need explicit authority.

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Open-source MCP servers for Latin American commerce — Pix, NF-e, banking, fiscal, logistics, and messaging across Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, an…

pi coding agent in a technicolor web trenchcoat

Open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform — track, analyze, and improve AI visibility, citations, prompts, competitors, and content opportunities across ChatG…

Open-source toolkit for the QVeris capability routing network: CLI, MCP server, Python SDK, skills, and REST API docs for agents to discover, inspect, call, and…

⚡ The Complete X/Twitter Automation Toolkit — Scrapers, MCP server for AI agents (Claude/GPT), CLI, browser scripts. No API fees. Open source. Unfollow people w…

The AI agent that interacts with you in the real world.

Offline Codex Desktop migration for Windows and macOS.

LLM 驱动的多市场股票智能分析系统：多源行情、实时新闻、决策看板与自动推送，支持零成本定时运行。 LLM-powered multi-market stock analysis system with multi-source market data, real-time news, decision dashbo…

Your smart, reliable, and friendly personal AI assistant.

The LLM Anti-Framework

A general-purpose AIGC video engine: script to finished film in one pipeline — dramas, ads, product videos, otome games, and more. | 通用 AIGC 视频引擎 —— 从剧本到成片一条流水线…

GTM agent for technical founders. Pay-per-result. Signed receipts. Two surfaces: terminal CLI + local web dashboard.

Desktop automation MCP server — computer use for any AI agent: control screen, windows, mouse/keyboard, and Chrome via Model Context Protocol (stdio)

DeepSeek Harness (dsh) Windows desktop client - bundled Node.js + dsh CLI, one-click launch

Open-source, real-time collaborative AI canvas - notes, mini-apps, and agents on one infinite board.

MCPSafari: Native Safari MCP Server for AI Agents

197 bioinformatics & life science skills for Claude Code and AI agents — BixBench 92.0% accuracy. RNA-seq, single-cell, drug discovery, proteomics, and more. Po…

The AI agent with a wallet — spends USDC autonomously to get real work done. Apache-2.0, TypeScript.

The fastest browser for AI agents to run browser automation, built for sharing your logged-in browser state with your AI agents, like Codex or Claude Code, with…

Ouroboros — self-creating AI agent. Born Feb 16, 2026.