LLM Mart Basic

Authoring guide for creating a new skill in this plugin, matching the conventions the existing skills already use. Establishes the three decisions every skill must make before any prose is written: how it is invoked (entry point vs building block), how it acquires its input, and

Use when an adversarial code review is needed after implementation. Reviews with fresh context and no shared conversation history to prevent self-evaluation bias. Produces a hard-gating verdict — REQUEST CHANGES blocks shipping. Example triggers — "review my changes", "code revie

Use after research is complete to draft the approach before any code is written. Drafts a ~200-line design document covering current state, desired end state, patterns to follow, and decisions made. Resolves its own open questions autonomously, recording each as an explicit, audi

Use when you need to locate files in a codebase relevant to a specific area. Maps conceptual goals to actual file locations even when exact names are unknown. Operates from questions.md only, never the original task description.

Use when the implementation plan needs to be executed slice by slice. A seasoned coding expert that reads the plan, follows TDD discipline, executes one vertical slice at a time, and commits each slice atomically when its tests pass. Dispatched during the Implement phase.

Use after the structure is produced to create the tactical implementation plan. Translates each vertical slice in structure.md into precise file-level steps with acceptance test mappings. The plan is a tactical artifact for the implementer — neither the structure nor the plan is

Use as the first agent of the QRSPI pipeline. Decomposes a user's task description into a full task record (task.md) and neutral research questions (questions.md), plus conditional artifacts — a prd.md when the PRD criteria apply, and a repos.md listing the repos the topic touche

Use when codebase facts need to be gathered before any design or implementation work. Reads code, traces dependencies, documents patterns. Receives only the path to questions.md, never the original task description.

Use when a security review is needed after implementation. Applies OWASP-style checks with fresh context. Critical findings are a hard gate — they block shipping until resolved. Example triggers — "security review", "check for vulnerabilities", "audit this code for security issue

Use after the design review passes to break the work into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Each slice is end-to-end (touches every layer needed to deliver one piece of functionality), independently testable, and atomically committable. Produces a ~2-page document th

Use after implementation to review whether project documentation needs updating. Reads the diff and compares against existing docs to identify gaps and stale content. Produces a structured report — does not rewrite docs itself. Example triggers — "check if docs need updating", "d

Use after the worktree is prepared to write all failing acceptance tests from the structure. Tests form the immutable scope fence for implementation. Operates inside the implement phase as a sub-step before the implementer runs.

Use when live application verification is needed after implementation. Boots the application, interacts with it as a user would, and evaluates the experience. For API-only projects, sends real HTTP requests. Example triggers — "verify the app works", "test the UI", "check the use

Use when comprehensive verification checks need to run before completion. Runs all available checks (format, lint, type check, build, tests) in speed order and produces an evidence-based report. Example triggers — "run all checks", "verify the build", "pre-flight checks", "does e

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparin

Investigate fast-agent session and history files to diagnose issues. Use when a session ended unexpectedly, when debugging tool loops, when correlating sub-agent traces with main sessions, or when analyzing conversation flow and timing. Covers session.json metadata, history JSON

Run shell and filesystem tools in local, Docker, Hugging Face, or custom environments.

Attach files, MCP resources, and prompt files directly to agent conversations.

Shape agent behavior with reusable instructions and prompt files.

Add slash commands and post-turn displays to fast-agent.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Commit changes with festival traceability metadata

Create a new festival, phase, sequence, or task

List all festivals with their status and completion percentage

Get the next actionable festival task with full context

Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view)

Show festival progress and current status

Learn about the Festival Methodology (concepts, structure, rules, and workflows)

Validate festival structure and find issues

Turn one sentence of intent into a structured plan, sized correctly and planned through the loop

Canonical reference for invoking `agentii-investment-intelligence` slash commands across Claude Code, OpenCode, Goose, Codex, OpenClaw, and Claude Cowork. Frozen at v1.0 per the mode-addressability syntax + Round 4 Q12.

Operational KPI dashboard — headcount trends, utilization rates, backlog/book-to-bill

Revenue decomposition — segment breakdown, geographic split, product-line waterfall

Unit economics analysis — CAC/LTV estimation, churn inference, gross margin per unit

What-if scenario analysis — scenario tree construction (bear/base/bull), sensitivity to macro variables

Business model classification and structural analysis — product/service/platform, distribution channels, revenue composition, market sizing

Competitive landscape analysis — peer positioning, market-share dynamics, moat assessment

Earnings sentiment analysis — analyst estimates vs. guidance, sentiment trends, surprise history

Growth strategy analysis — organic/inorganic growth decomposition, pipeline analysis, execution tracking

Recent quarter performance analysis — quarterly P&L, margin drivers, EPS, sequential momentum

Risk analysis — regulatory, competitive, macro, and technology risk assessment

Your efficient agentic AI coding CLI assistant

AI coding with Aegis governance built into execution: baseline-aware changes, evidence-backed delivery. Free desktop client, your choice of model. 将哲科思维融入 AI 开发…

Android in docker solution with noVNC supported, video recording, mcp server and AI-agent

Your AI assistant, built for the agentic era. Open source and local: talk to it, and it runs your agents, your coding CLIs, your browser and your apps. Windows,…

Verifiable program-level self-evolution for AI-for-Science agents: Skills and typed Operators grow from replay-verified executions.

Let Claude Code and other coding agents drive and debug Chrome from the shell. DOM, network, console and raw CDP as short commands, no screenshots and no MCP ne…

Unofficial, agent-friendly Mercadona shopping CLI (Go) — search products, read prices, build a cart and prepare checkout from the terminal. BYO credentials.

Local-first AI canvas for visual workflows, AI short drama, image/video generation, storyboarding and asset management. ComfyUI, AI agents, MCP & Blender. 本地优先…

Let any AI coding tool — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex — drive your real Chrome. One-prompt setup, muscle memory, local-first.

runs anywhere. uses anything