LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user is explicitly working with Quarto, .qmd files, _quarto.yml, Quarto projects, or Quarto features such as callouts, cross-references, citations, Mermaid diagrams, extensions, websites, books, presentations, and reports. Also use for explicit migration from or comp

Deploy or publish Python and R content to a Posit Connect server using rsconnect-python or the R rsconnect package. Handles interactive apps and dashboards, web APIs, rendered documents, and prepared bundles/manifests. Use whenever the user asks to deploy, publish, or redeploy co

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, o

Use when the user wants to find, evaluate, audit, or install an open-source AI agent skill or MCP server — e.g. "find an MCP server for Postgres", "is this skill safe to install", "what should I use to scrape a website". Searches a quality-scored, security-graded catalog of ~20K

Generator-evaluator separation and review methodology — loaded by review agents to enforce fresh-context review discipline and gate verdicts; findings from the code, security, and docs reviewers are formatted per the conventional-comments skill. Trigger on "review this diff", "re

Adversarially review a technical design document with fresh context. Dispatches the built-in read-only `Explore` subagent (clean context, no shared history with the design-author) against `docs/plans/<id>/design.md` and presents its verdict — APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT.

Tear down local and remote branch state after a pull request is finished, in one of two modes. Mode A (merged): verify the PR actually merged, remove the branch's worktree, resync the default branch, and delete the local branch. Mode B (closed / abandoned): close the PR(s), then

Bring a feature branch up to date with its base without changing what the branch does: capture a pre-rebase check baseline, fetch, rebase onto the latest base, resolve each conflict from both sides' intent with the rationale recorded to disk, re-run the same checks, and treat any

Watch your own pull request for review feedback: undraft it when the cue clearly says it is ready (an ambiguous cue watches the draft), take a baseline snapshot, then poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours and triage new feedback as it arrives — inline review threads

Watch a pull request you are reviewing until your feedback is settled, re-review each settlement, then approve once: poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours until every review thread you opened is resolved and every plain PR comment you posted has a later push behind

Land a reviewed pull request: discover the open PR for the current branch, push any unpushed commits, wait for CI to go green, then squash-merge it so the PR title (which may carry a version) lands as the commit subject. Handles a PR that has fallen behind its base (rebase + forc

Decide the approach before any code is written. The design-author drafts the ~200-line design document, resolving its own open questions autonomously as recorded assumptions, then an adversarial design review gates advancement. Trigger on "design this", "let's align on the approa

Compressed bug-fix pipeline — reproduce, write failing test, minimal fix, verify, and open a draft PR. Skips Question/Research/Design/Structure/Plan phases. Invoke ONLY on explicit pipeline intent — the user says "run the bug-fix pipeline", "team-fix this bug", or runs "/team-fix

Execute the implementation phase. Includes test-first sub-step (writing failing tests, mechanical confirmation gate) and adversarial verification (5 parallel reviewers with hard-gate retry loop). Trigger on "implement this", "execute the plan", or "/team-implement".

Produce the tactical implementation plan from the structure. The plan is an autonomous artifact for the implementer — no approval gate at this phase (the design was already gated by the adversarial design review). Trigger on "plan the implementation", "spell out the steps", or "/

Open the pull request after verification passes. Updates the changelog, optionally surfaces the tracking ticket, and closes out the topic. Trigger on "open the PR", "open a draft PR", or "/team-pr". To land/merge a reviewed PR (wait for CI, then squash-merge) use the separate /sh

Decompose a feature description, ticket, or issue link into the QRSPI Question artifacts (task.md, questions.md). Trigger on "shape this idea", "decompose this task", or "/team-question".

Research a codebase area before making changes. Dispatches parallel read-only agents (file-finder + researcher) that read questions.md only — never task.md. Trigger on "research this", "explore the codebase for", or "/team-research".

Break the reviewed design into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Runs autonomously and advances to PLAN — no approval gate. Trigger on "slice this up", "break the design into steps", or "/team-structure".

Prepare one or more isolated git worktrees — one per repository the topic touches. Router action — no agent. Trigger on "set up the worktree", "isolate this work", or "/team-worktree".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart search by use case, content remix, sample images.

嘉立创EDA专业版(EasyEDA Pro)自动化：给 AI harness 装上画板的「手」—— 一套 typed 原理图/PCB 动作，CLI / Agent Skill / stdio MCP 三形态融合接入。承接嘉立创「不以卖板赚钱，以培养中国工程师为己任」 | EasyEDA Pro automation:…

Claude Code session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.claude/projects. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, and live tail sessions on desktop, web, and TUI.

Shared memory MCP server — persistent, searchable, cross-client Claude, Opencode

OpenAI Codex CLI session log viewer for JSONL files in ~/.codex/sessions. Browse conversations, tool calls, tokens, collaboration chains, and live sessions on d…

High-performance Google Drive CLI and Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for LLM/AI agents. Natively execute Google Apps Script (GAS) under a secure whiteliste…

"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"

Local-first chat history analyzer with AI. | 本地优先的 AI 聊天记录分析工具

Official Oxylabs MCP integration

Persistent memory for Claude Code & Codex CLI. Auto-extracted knowledge graph, multi-representation embeddings, 3D WebGL visualization. LongMemEval R@5=97.45%.…

One person, a team of agents. Multi-session CLI that collaborates across terminals; /goal keeps long tasks running; WeChat/WeCom/Feishu gateway lets you call th…

AI 基础知识 - GPU 架构、CUDA 编程、大模型基础及AI Agent 相关知识。

Self-hosted, open-source agent skill registry for enterprises. Publish & version skill packages, govern with RBAC and audit logs, deploy on-premise with Docke…

深度调研报告生成 Skill — 一条命令，十分钟出券商级深度调研报告 / Professional deep research report generation Skill · Supports 19 languages

The OKF toolkit for Claude Code — author, maintain, validate & visualize Open Knowledge Format bundles. Plugin, agent skills, and a GitHub Action.

Autonomous AI pentesting agents — real-time reconnaissance, vulnerability detection, and exploitation orchestration. Go + TypeScript.

Native macOS and iOS App for the Hermes AI agent — multi-window, multi-server (local + remote over SSH). Chat, dashboard, sessions, memory, cron, MCP, and more.

Multiplayer Claude Code and Codex. Self-hosted team workspace for Claude Code and Codex. Multi-user, browser-based, AI mates with memory.

Every past session, subagent, and workflow -- queryable by your agent, browsable by you

盯盘侠 PanWatch · 自托管 AI 盯盘助手，集成 TradingAgents 多 Agent 投资决策 | A股/港股/美股实时监控、持仓管理、智能分析、全渠道推送