LLM Mart Basic

Use when the user is explicitly working with Quarto, .qmd files, _quarto.yml, Quarto projects, or Quarto features such as callouts, cross-references, citations, Mermaid diagrams, extensions, websites, books, presentations, and reports. Also use for explicit migration from or comp

Deploy or publish Python and R content to a Posit Connect server using rsconnect-python or the R rsconnect package. Handles interactive apps and dashboards, web APIs, rendered documents, and prepared bundles/manifests. Use whenever the user asks to deploy, publish, or redeploy co

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, o

Use when the user wants to find, evaluate, audit, or install an open-source AI agent skill or MCP server — e.g. "find an MCP server for Postgres", "is this skill safe to install", "what should I use to scrape a website". Searches a quality-scored, security-graded catalog of ~20K

Generator-evaluator separation and review methodology — loaded by review agents to enforce fresh-context review discipline and gate verdicts; findings from the code, security, and docs reviewers are formatted per the conventional-comments skill. Trigger on "review this diff", "re

Adversarially review a technical design document with fresh context. Dispatches the built-in read-only `Explore` subagent (clean context, no shared history with the design-author) against `docs/plans/<id>/design.md` and presents its verdict — APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT.

Tear down local and remote branch state after a pull request is finished, in one of two modes. Mode A (merged): verify the PR actually merged, remove the branch's worktree, resync the default branch, and delete the local branch. Mode B (closed / abandoned): close the PR(s), then

Bring a feature branch up to date with its base without changing what the branch does: capture a pre-rebase check baseline, fetch, rebase onto the latest base, resolve each conflict from both sides' intent with the rationale recorded to disk, re-run the same checks, and treat any

Watch your own pull request for review feedback: undraft it when the cue clearly says it is ready (an ambiguous cue watches the draft), take a baseline snapshot, then poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours and triage new feedback as it arrives — inline review threads

Watch a pull request you are reviewing until your feedback is settled, re-review each settlement, then approve once: poll GitHub in ~31-minute cycles for up to 24 hours until every review thread you opened is resolved and every plain PR comment you posted has a later push behind

Land a reviewed pull request: discover the open PR for the current branch, push any unpushed commits, wait for CI to go green, then squash-merge it so the PR title (which may carry a version) lands as the commit subject. Handles a PR that has fallen behind its base (rebase + forc

Decide the approach before any code is written. The design-author drafts the ~200-line design document, resolving its own open questions autonomously as recorded assumptions, then an adversarial design review gates advancement. Trigger on "design this", "let's align on the approa

Compressed bug-fix pipeline — reproduce, write failing test, minimal fix, verify, and open a draft PR. Skips Question/Research/Design/Structure/Plan phases. Invoke ONLY on explicit pipeline intent — the user says "run the bug-fix pipeline", "team-fix this bug", or runs "/team-fix

Execute the implementation phase. Includes test-first sub-step (writing failing tests, mechanical confirmation gate) and adversarial verification (5 parallel reviewers with hard-gate retry loop). Trigger on "implement this", "execute the plan", or "/team-implement".

Produce the tactical implementation plan from the structure. The plan is an autonomous artifact for the implementer — no approval gate at this phase (the design was already gated by the adversarial design review). Trigger on "plan the implementation", "spell out the steps", or "/

Open the pull request after verification passes. Updates the changelog, optionally surfaces the tracking ticket, and closes out the topic. Trigger on "open the PR", "open a draft PR", or "/team-pr". To land/merge a reviewed PR (wait for CI, then squash-merge) use the separate /sh

Decompose a feature description, ticket, or issue link into the QRSPI Question artifacts (task.md, questions.md). Trigger on "shape this idea", "decompose this task", or "/team-question".

Research a codebase area before making changes. Dispatches parallel read-only agents (file-finder + researcher) that read questions.md only — never task.md. Trigger on "research this", "explore the codebase for", or "/team-research".

Break the reviewed design into vertical slices with verification checkpoints. Runs autonomously and advances to PLAN — no approval gate. Trigger on "slice this up", "break the design into steps", or "/team-structure".

Prepare one or more isolated git worktrees — one per repository the topic touches. Router action — no agent. Trigger on "set up the worktree", "isolate this work", or "/team-worktree".

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Extract facts from meetings and update your knowledge base — person profiles, chronological log, and index. Use when the user asks "ingest my meetings", "update my knowledge base", "extract facts from meetings", "sync meetings to wiki", "backfill knowledge", or wants their PARA/Obsidian/wiki profiles updated from conversation data.

Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.

List recent meetings and voice memos. Use when the user asks "what meetings did I have", "show my recent recordings", "any meetings today", "list my voice memos", or wants an overview of their meeting history. Also use when they need to find a specific meeting by browsing rather than searching.

Act as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session. Use when the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent, to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions. Do not use this skill to start or control the separate Minutes Coach HUD; explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests belong to minutes-copilot, and an ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification.

Self-coaching analysis of your own behavior across meetings — talk-time ratio, filler words, hedging language, monologue length, energy patterns, and (when meetings are tagged via /minutes-tag) what your behavior in winning meetings looks like vs losing ones. Use this whenever the user says "how did I do", "review my last meeting", "mirror", "self-review", "show my patterns", "coach me", "where am I weak", "talk time", "am I improving", "what do I do in meetings I win", "feedback on me", or asks for any kind of personal feedback on their own meeting behavior. This is the rare skill that gives the user a mirror to their own habits — surface it whenever they show curiosity about their own performance, even if they don't use the word "mirror".

Add a note to the current recording or annotate a past meeting. Use whenever the user says "note that", "remember this", "mark this as important", "add a note about", "annotate the meeting", or wants to capture a thought during or after a recording. Plain text input — no markdown needed.

Interactive meeting preparation — builds a relationship brief and talking points before a call. Use when the user says "prep me for my call with", "I'm meeting with X", "prepare me for", "what should I bring up with", "meeting prep", "get ready for my call", or wants to review history with someone before a meeting.

Generate a daily digest of today's policy-authorized meetings and voice memos — key decisions, action items, and themes across available recordings. Use when the user asks "recap my day", "what happened in my meetings today", "daily summary", "what did I discuss today", "any action items from today", or wants a consolidated view of the day's conversations.

Start or stop recording a meeting, call, or voice memo. Use this whenever the user says "record", "start recording", "capture this meeting", "stop recording", "I'm in a meeting", "take notes on this call", or wants to transcribe live audio. Also use when they ask about recording status or want to know if something is being recorded.

Draft user-facing Minutes release notes for a version from the commit range, recent GitHub releases, and the repository release checks. Use when the user asks to write, generate, prepare, revise, or review release notes or a changelog for a Minutes version.

Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".

Guided first-time setup for Minutes — download whisper model, create directories, configure audio input. Use when the user says "set up minutes", "install minutes", "first time setup", "configure minutes", "get started with minutes", "how do I start using minutes", or when verify shows missing components.

Lightweight outcome tagging for meetings — won, lost, stalled, great, or noise. Use whenever the user says "tag this meeting", "mark that as a win", "that one was a loss", "tag yesterday's call as stalled", "mark this great", "that meeting was noise", "label that meeting", or any time they describe a meeting outcome in passing. Tagging takes 5 seconds and unlocks /minutes-mirror correlation analysis — the more meetings get tagged, the smarter mirror gets at telling the user what behavior patterns lead to wins. Surface this skill any time the user mentions a meeting result, win, loss, or wasted time.

Verify that Minutes is properly set up and working — model downloaded, mic accessible, directories exist, no stale state. Use when the user says "is minutes working", "check my setup", "verify minutes", "test recording setup", "why isn't minutes working", "minutes health check", or after running setup for the first time.

Analyze a product walkthrough, bug report video, Loom, or ScreenPal using Minutes transcription plus visual review. Use when the user wants a recorded demo or bug clip turned into a durable brief with transcript, key frames, issues, and next steps.

Weekly meeting synthesis — themes, decision arcs, stale commitments, and what deserves your attention next week. Use when the user says "weekly review", "what happened this week", "weekly summary", "recap my week", "any outstanding items", "week in review", or at the end of a work week.

Search agent history or trace code to its original agent session

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.

Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.

Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.

Your Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps with easily extensible capabilities.

Agent OS: the agent gets smarter on its own. We just hold the line: the grading command and expected result never make it into the success contract we hand it.…

Curated systems, benchmarks, and papers etc. on memory for LLMs/MLLMs --- long-term context, retrieval, and reasoning.

:memo: Vimlike Modal Text Editor in Rust

CI-native security testing for MCP servers. Attack simulation, schema drift detection, and health scoring before agents depend on them.

Hermes Agent memory plugin/provider for scope-aware recall, SQLite truth, LanceDB semantic search, and hybrid retrieval.

For You Agent——AI 时代的个人随身数字人格。把你的模型、AI 账号、技能、提示词和工作方式，带到每一个 AI 工具里。

A coding agent: give it a prompt and it reads, writes, runs commands, and searches code in a loop until the work is done, using native tool-calling across OpenA…

A secure persistent personal agent server in Rust. One binary, sandboxed execution, multi-provider LLMs, voice, memory, Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord, Teams, and…

Self-evolving agent: grows skill tree from 3.3K-line seed, achieving full system control with 6x less token consumption

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

See your agent think. Zero-config observability & governance for 26 AI agent runtimes: Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cline, Ope…

Save 94% on AI coding tokens. Index your codebase, agents search instead of reading files. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI. Local MCP…

Yet another coding agent harness, lightweight and written in go.

a coding Agent from pi. ∞ providers, sub-agents, hashline edits, and a permission gate

Omnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting…

🧠 Leon is your open-source personal assistant.

The Station, an open-world multi-agent environment that models a miniature scientific ecosystem.

The Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI Protocol

VelaTerm = iTerm2 + Codex, The Best Terminal for AI Coding