LLM Mart Basic

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Record the present state by mode — decision (ADR, RFC, rule), code (spec, doc, guide, scenario), or research (a ready report or one external material); a gate picks the document type.

First-time Archcore setup — wire host configs, measure the authored context, compose the full first-day seed in one preview, and create it on one confirm; import converts CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, rule files, ADRs, and docs into native documents; refresh adds new facts or drills into one domain.

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route — a small fix exits with no documents, one capability gets a spec and a plan, a large initiative gets an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability; start with sdd, sources (market research), iso (regulated work), or research (technical investigation) to run that path directly.

Review branch changes against Archcore docs, or report project health; drift runs staleness detection, deep a full documentation audit, closeout closes a finished feature, experience captures a repeated pattern.

Verify that citations actually exist and that the claims they support are faithful to the cited source. Runs deterministic existence checks (Crossref / OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / arXiv) plus a claim-faithfulness pass via the alterlab-citation-verifier skill.

Run a systematic, reproducible literature review on a topic and return an APA 7.0 annotated bibliography with a documented search strategy. Invokes the alterlab-deep-research pipeline in lit-review mode.

Run a full multi-perspective peer review of a manuscript, simulating an Editor-in-Chief plus three peer reviewers and a Devil's Advocate, and produce a structured editorial decision and revision roadmap. Invokes the alterlab-paper-reviewer skill.

Orchestrate the end-to-end academic research-to-publication workflow (research, write, integrity check, review, revise, re-review, finalize) with mandatory integrity gates and two-stage peer review. Invokes the alterlab-research-pipeline orchestrator.

Audit infra security: secrets, deps, CI/CD, webhooks, AI/skill files

Audit Solana program code for exploitable bugs and write a findings report

Compare per-instruction CU with the stored baseline to catch regressions

Build the web client (Next.js, Vite, React) and check env, types and bundle

Build Solana programs (Anchor, Pinocchio, native), incl. verifiable builds

Build the Unity project in batchmode for WebGL, desktop, Android or PSG1

Turn a solana-ai-kit fork into a project: set up CLAUDE.md, remove kit files

Un-ignore and commit the kit config dir, instruction file, .mcp.json and .gitmodules

Replay a user's failing transaction on forked state and map the error to source

Deploy a program to devnet, or to mainnet after the user's explicit go-ahead

Review the branch diff for Solana security issues, CU waste and AI slop

Read-only check of toolchain and kit config, with one fix-it command per failure

An open-source, privacy-first, self-hosted knowledge workspace where humans and AI agents work together 开源、隐私优先、自托管的知识工作空间，让人与智能体在此协作

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

The go-to web for your AI coding agent — local-first search, fetch, crawl & research over MCP. No API keys, no cloud, $0/query. Public beta.

Transform and optimize your markdown documentation for Large Language Models (LLMs) and RAG systems. Generate llms.txt automatically.

合乎周礼：DeepSeek-powered Zhouli-style Chinese translator, web app, and distributable Skill package.

This is a fork of the https://dockbox.dev project I made

🏆 Curated, ranked list of AI agent harnesses (100+) — plus an MCP server, llms.txt & JSON so agents can recommend them too. Rescored weekly.

A Python framework for modular, self-contained skill management for machines.

ADHD — a skill for coding agents. Tree-of-thought with pruning, built on the Claude & Codex Agent SDK. Fans out parallel divergent thoughts under different cogn…

AI Agent 驱动的开源可自部署视频工作台：将小说与剧本转为角色、场景、道具资产、分镜、视频和剪映草稿，支持跨镜头一致性、多供应商与费用追踪 | Self-hosted AI video workspace for stories, storyboards and short-form video producti…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop App: a local AI desktop workspace for DSH Sessions, projects, files, web research, plugins, and Office artifacts.

Autonomous Offensive Security, Bug Bounty & Red Teaming Agent Framework powered by Hermes Agent, specialized reasoning skills, and multi-model LLM orchestration…

⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in

Supercharge AI Agents, Safely

X (Twitter) Scraper API and X API Alternative. You do not need an official X developer account. You do not need to connect or use an X account for supported scr…

My AI Stand. Realtime by day, rewriting itself by night. Summon my AI superpower.

Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.

观澜 / Guanlan：AI Agent 的中文互联网研究、阅读与信源路由工具。

Mac Agent for macOS 26: the agentic AI harness for your Mac Desktop. Computer use, automation, scripting, coding, and more. Powered by 18+ providers across loca…

Semantic version control => entity-level diffs, blame, and impact analysis on top of git. 28 languages via tree-sitter. Built for coding agents.