LLM Mart Basic

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

AI coding platform for teams

AI Multi-Agent Framework in .NET

Production-ready code examples for Telnyx AI Communications Infrastructure — Voice AI, SMS, SIP, and IoT APIs

UltraGameStudio - AI coding agent for game development: engine workflows, gameplay code, and asset generation.

🦞 ResearchClawBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Automated Research from Re-Discovery to New-Discovery

The context-aware model router that learns & adapts to your long-horizon coding agent workflows. Lightweight & extensible, works with any harnesses, any models,…

Open-source sandboxes where coding agents build and deploy. Spin up isolated environments where Claude Code, Cursor, and other agents code and deploy software.

Native desktop UI for Claude Code with orchestration, streaming, background agents, and multi-provider support. Built with Tauri + React.

OpenCode mobile client via Telegram: run and monitor AI coding tasks from your phone while everything runs locally on your machine. Scheduled tasks support.

Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.

Exposes internet search tools for use by LLM-backed Assist in Home Assistant

Templates and workflow for generating PRDs, Tech Designs, and MVP and more using LLMs for AI IDEs

Versus Incident is the self-hosted AI SRE agent. It learns what your system normally look like and escalates only what is new or unexpected issues — routing to…

Browser-native side panel for Hermes Agent — connect web context to your local Hermes runtime.

Agentic-friendly CLI generator for APIs: turn Swagger, OpenAPI, and google.api.http protos into single-binary CLIs with catalogs and generated Skills.

Open-source agent platform for Global × China enterprises — wire every system through one agent core. Self-hosted, any LLM.

Official python implementation of UTCP. UTCP is an open standard that lets AI agents call any API directly, without extra middleware.

An agent small enough to run anywhere. A minimal agentic runtime in C — ~380 lines, 54KB binary, ~2MB RAM. A skill file + an LLM + a shell loop, no framework.

AgentiLoop Agent! An Autonomous Agentic Agent for Mac, and exclusive Apple only harnesss. Suppprtd automation, scripting, coding, build anything and more. Power…

微信公众号 AI 运营助手 | 选题、写稿、审稿、排版、配图、发布全流程 Skill，支持 OpenClaw / Claude Code / Cursor / Codex