LLM Mart Basic

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:post-merge-cleanup}}

Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:commit-gate}}

Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-check}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:context-creation}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:debug}}

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decompose}}

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement{{IF:pi}}, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap{{ELSE}}, and harmless live-fire probe{{END}}. Read-only.

Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.

Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.

Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:finishing-a-development-branch}}

Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.

Trim transcript clutter to extend session lifetime — analyze, prune a copy, or toggle the after-each-turn service. Dry-run by default; gains land at resume/compaction, not the current turn.

{{SKILL_ENTRY:decision-variance}}

LLM-powered toolkit for skill analysis, AI interviews, resume scoring, and job structuring. Automates professional skill taxonomy and interview processes with a…

【三年面试五年模拟】AIGC/LLM/AI Agent算法工程师面试资源平台。涵盖AIGC、LLM大模型、AI Agent、具身智能、传统深度学习、计算机视觉、自然语言处理、自动驾驶、机器学习、强化学习、大数据挖掘、世界模型、元宇宙、AGI等AI行业面试笔试干货经验与核心跨周期知识。

Easiest and laziest way for building multi-agent LLMs applications.

Drive Claude Code or OpenAI Codex from your phone — resume sessions, stream output, approve tool permissions remotely. End-to-end encrypted, zero-knowledge rela…

MCP server for autonomous agent economies: wallets, signed RTC micropayments, bounty discovery, BoTTube video publishing, and Beacon agent-to-agent messaging. G…

Free, open-source alternative to Microsoft Office with built-in AI agents — Word (.docx), Excel (.xlsx), PowerPoint (.pptx), PDF and Markdown editing for macOS,…

NSE BSE Indian Stock Market Data MCP server — search, screen & analyze all 8,200+ NSE/BSE stocks with 34 tools: live quotes, financials, technicals, 326-ratio s…

全流程 智能招投标 Agent：标书生成 · 招投标解读 · 标书检查 · 标书文档ai排版 · 商机发现 一键完成。 21 项合规检查 · 多模型切换 · RAG 知识库 · OCR 抽取。 从招标公告到可交付 docx 文档，全流程 AI 自动化。

Benzi is AI-native code intelligence infrastructure. Claude Code greps; Cursor embeds; Aider maps signatures; Benzi resolves — and answers in O(1). Every langua…

From ticket to reviewed pull request. Free and open-source, on your machine.

Get web data for AI agents and LLMs - fast, efficient, and reliable with Rust

Open-source, license-free MCP server for RTL waveform debug: reads FST waveforms (VCD/FSDB auto-convert) plus a SystemVerilog netlist, with 34 tools covering dr…

Open-source, desktop-grade AI agent that gets real work done — data analysis, slides, docs, video & web research. Built on OpenClaw; runs tools on your real des…

Parallel, isolated dev environments for humans and AI coding agents. Real containers. Real databases. Zero collisions.

OpenCode goal plugin for Codex-style goal mode, /goal slash commands, persistent objectives, and AI coding agent focus.

Battle-tested skill library for AI agents. Save 98% of API costs with ready-to-use code for crypto, PDFs, search, web scraping & more. No trial-and-error, no ex…

Deep Code 是专为 deepseek-v4 模型优化的终端 AI 编码助手，支持深度思考、推理强度控制以及 Agent Skills。

China Unicom's Yuanjing Wanwu Agent Platform is an enterprise-grade, multi-tenant AI agent development platform. It helps users build applications such as intel…

⚡ CloakBrowser MCP server for AI agents: Playwright-powered browsing, clean tool forwarding, Docker support, and multi-session HTTP transport.

MCP-NixOS - Model Context Protocol Server for NixOS resources