LLM Mart Basic

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Discovers functional scope from existing codebase for reverse documentation. Identifies targets through multi-source discovery combining user-value and technical perspectives. Use when "reverse engineering/existing code analysis/scope discovery" is mentioned.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or task file. Use when task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/, or when "execute task/implement task/start implementation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investigation to implemen

Creates a scoped ADR batch or one backend/general Design Doc from confirmed requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Setup automated synchronization workflows

Resolve synchronization conflicts automatically

Sync GitHub issues to Linear workspace

Sync Linear tasks to GitHub issues

Link pull requests to Linear tasks

Monitor GitHub-Linear sync health status

Synchronize task status with git commits, ensuring consistency between version control and task tracking.

Simulate system performance under various loads with capacity planning, bottleneck identification, and optimization strategies.

Create Linear tasks from pull requests

Test-driven development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor process and branch management

Balance team workload distribution

Automate changelog testing workflow

Analyze and report test coverage

I need you to create an integration testing plan for $ARGUMENTS

Accelerate scenario testing with rapid iteration cycles, confidence intervals, and compressed decision timelines.

Manage project todos in a todos.md file with add, complete, remove, and list operations

Generate troubleshooting documentation

Deep analysis and problem solving mode

Sets up a professional Unity project with industry-standard structure and configurations

Update current git branch name based on analysis of changes made

AI agent orchestration kit for Windows, Linux/MacOS with Codex skills, hooks, routing rules and profiles for Claude, OpenCode, Cursor, Gemini and Windsurf.

Skills & reviewer agents for AI-first climate science — built and used by a PhD atmospheric scientist

出行路书工作流 skill：联网实查 + 多源交叉验证，产出可核验、能执行的旅行攻略。覆盖吃住行游拍避全维度，附美食情报卡、基准骨架与校验工具，支持一键部署在线版。

Self-hosted AI code reviewer with indexed PR reviews, walkthroughs, vulnerability scanning, dependency graphs, custom rules, and a learning loop.

🧬 Extend EvoScientist with Installable Skill & Knowledge Packs

Give the agent a machine. Just not yours. Each AI coding agent gets its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd - active defense detects and stops t…

Automatic memory consolidation for OpenClaw agents — like sleep for your AI. Powered by MyClaw.ai

🗂 The essential checklist for modern web development, for humans and AI agents

Distribb CLI, Claude, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw skill for AI-powered SEO. Write content with your own AI, publish through Distribb's backlink network.

Open-source AI browser agent — type plain-language commands and Bah operates the web for you. Works with cloud AI (DeepSeek, Mistral, NVIDIA) or local Ollama mo…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup, 10 built-in UI…

Use your ChatGPT / Codex subscription with DeepSeek Harness via OAuth, with model access, usage quotas, search, and image generation — no API key or Codex CLI r…

Local-first A-share research workbench for DeepSeek Harness: market dashboards, watchlists, valuation, four investor agents, versioned reports, and continuous p…

Open-source video pipeline (clipper, AI video & more) — scout trends, clip long videos, generate captioned shorts, design motion graphics. Local-first, BYOK. AG…

Desktop app for the pi coding agent: streaming timeline, Git review with hunk staging, session tree, native UI for pi extensions. Windows · macOS · Linux. pi 编程…

Zero-dependency browser video editor that AI agents can drive — JSON timeline, MCP + REST, live-reloading UI

Personal Context Manager for Claude Code. Your life in walnuts.

Fast way to switch between Claude Code configuration profiles

AutoClip｜一个链接，一键出片。开源 AI 视频剪辑桌面工具，将播客、访谈、课程等长视频自动剪成短视频，生成字幕、封面和发布文案，适配抖音、小红书、TikTok、Reels 与 YouTube Shorts。Open-source AI video clipping & content repurposing.