LLM Mart Basic

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Detects conflicts across multiple Design Docs and provides structured reports. Use when multiple Design Docs exist, or when "consistency/conflict/sync/between documents" is mentioned. Focuses on detection and reporting only, no modifications.

Reviews one document or one ADR batch against governing requirements, repository evidence, and the needs of its next consumer. Use before user approval or when document consistency and completeness need verification.

Verifies changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use PROACTIVELY after test implementation completes, or when "test review/skeleton verification" is mentioned. Returns quality reports with failing items and fix instructio

Comprehensively collects problem-related information and creates evidence matrix. Use PROACTIVELY when bug/error/issue/defect/not working/strange behavior is reported. Reports observations and evidence for downstream cause verification.

Creates PRD and structures business requirements. Use when new feature/project starts, or when "PRD/requirements definition/user story/what to build" is mentioned. Defines user value and success metrics.

Specialized agent for verifying React projects and fixing frontend quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, type, or fix requests.

Collects compact scope and cost evidence for requirement confirmation while the user and orchestrator retain requirements, Structural Scale, and document-routing decisions. Use when new requirements, scope, or implementation extent must be confirmed.

Reviews implementation for security compliance against an authoritative Design Doc or Work Plan. Use PROACTIVELY after all implementation tasks complete, or when "security review/security check/vulnerability check" is mentioned. Returns structured findings with risk classificatio

Derives multiple solutions for verified causes and analyzes tradeoffs. Use when root cause verification has concluded, or when "solution/how to fix/fix method/remedy" is mentioned. Focuses on solutions from given conclusions without investigation.

Converts an approved Work Plan into the fewest executable implementation task files. Use when work plans are approved and task materialization is needed.

Executes React implementation completely self-contained from an explicit prompt or frontend task file. Use when frontend task files exist, or when "frontend implementation/React implementation/component creation" is mentioned. Asks no questions, executes consistently from investi

Creates a scoped frontend ADR batch or one Design Doc from confirmed UI requirements and decision-relevant repository evidence. Use when frontend technical choices or implementation design need an approved artifact.

Gathers decision-relevant UI facts from recorded external resources and the existing codebase. Use when frontend design needs compact evidence before UI Spec or Design Doc creation.

Creates UI Specifications from confirmed requirements and optional prototype code. Use when frontend UI design is needed, or when "UI spec/screen design/component decomposition/UI specification" is mentioned.

Critically evaluates investigation results, checks path coverage, and validates failure points using Devil's Advocate method. Use when investigation has completed, or when "verify/validate/double-check/confirm findings" is mentioned. Focuses on verification and conclusion derivat

Creates implementation-focused work plans from approved Design Docs. Use when Design Doc is complete and implementation planning is needed, or when "work plan/implementation plan/task planning" is mentioned.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

credo - Set up Claude Code with recommended workflows and plugins

dogma - Find and fix AI-typical patterns in code (reactive cleanup)

dogma - Sync documentation across README files and wiki articles

dogma - Interactively collect and apply CLAUDE rules to the project

dogma - Add ignore patterns to multiple locations at once

dogma - Run project-specific linting and formatting on staged files (non-interactive)

dogma - Create or update DOGMA-PERMISSIONS.md interactively (Git, File, and Workflow permissions)

dogma - Sanitize git history from Claude/AI traces and fix tracking issues

dogma - Intelligently sync Claude instructions from a source to the current project with interactive review

dogma - Check and fix version mismatches across all version files

Install GSD resources into the active Claude config dir (${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/get-shit-done/) (required before using other GSD commands)

Remove GSD resources from the active Claude config dir (${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude})

hydra - Remove already merged worktrees and their branches

hydra - Create a new Git worktree for isolated work

hydra - Safely remove a Git worktree

hydra - Show available commands and explain the concept

hydra - List all Git worktrees of the repository

hydra - Merge a worktree branch back into current branch

hydra - Start multiple agents in parallel across worktrees

hydra - Start an agent in an existing worktree

An open-source, privacy-first, self-hosted knowledge workspace where humans and AI agents work together 开源、隐私优先、自托管的知识工作空间，让人与智能体在此协作

Scale computer-use 2.0 with open-source drivers, cross-OS fleets, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation.

The go-to web for your AI coding agent — local-first search, fetch, crawl & research over MCP. No API keys, no cloud, $0/query. Public beta.

Transform and optimize your markdown documentation for Large Language Models (LLMs) and RAG systems. Generate llms.txt automatically.

合乎周礼：DeepSeek-powered Zhouli-style Chinese translator, web app, and distributable Skill package.

This is a fork of the https://dockbox.dev project I made

🏆 Curated, ranked list of AI agent harnesses (100+) — plus an MCP server, llms.txt & JSON so agents can recommend them too. Rescored weekly.

A Python framework for modular, self-contained skill management for machines.

ADHD — a skill for coding agents. Tree-of-thought with pruning, built on the Claude & Codex Agent SDK. Fans out parallel divergent thoughts under different cogn…

AI Agent 驱动的开源可自部署视频工作台：将小说与剧本转为角色、场景、道具资产、分镜、视频和剪映草稿，支持跨镜头一致性、多供应商与费用追踪 | Self-hosted AI video workspace for stories, storyboards and short-form video producti…

DeepSeek Harness Desktop App: a local AI desktop workspace for DSH Sessions, projects, files, web research, plugins, and Office artifacts.

Autonomous Offensive Security, Bug Bounty & Red Teaming Agent Framework powered by Hermes Agent, specialized reasoning skills, and multi-model LLM orchestration…

⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in

Supercharge AI Agents, Safely

X (Twitter) Scraper API and X API Alternative. You do not need an official X developer account. You do not need to connect or use an X account for supported scr…

My AI Stand. Realtime by day, rewriting itself by night. Summon my AI superpower.

Open-source coding agent for your terminal, built in Rust and on a journey of continuous community improvement. Issues and PRs welcome.

观澜 / Guanlan：AI Agent 的中文互联网研究、阅读与信源路由工具。

Mac Agent for macOS 26: the agentic AI harness for your Mac Desktop. Computer use, automation, scripting, coding, and more. Powered by 18+ providers across loca…

Semantic version control => entity-level diffs, blame, and impact analysis on top of git. 28 languages via tree-sitter. Built for coding agents.