LLM Mart Basic

Investigate problem, verify findings, and derive solutions

Adjust an already-implemented UI in-session with verification against the design source

Execute materialized frontend task files in autonomous execution mode

Execute from repository evidence through applicable UI Spec and optional ADR decisions to complete frontend Design Doc approval

Create frontend work plan from design document and obtain plan approval

Design Doc compliance and security validation with optional auto-fixes

Execute materialized fullstack task files with layer-aware agent routing

Orchestrate full-cycle implementation across backend and frontend layers

Orchestrate the complete implementation lifecycle from requirements to deployment

Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval

Design Doc compliance and security validation with optional auto-fixes

Update existing design documents (Design Doc / PRD / ADR) with review

Separates the outcome a change must produce from the requirements proposed to reach it, records what the user excluded, and bands cost from structure. Use when a requirement enters a workflow, before design begins.

Guides subagent coordination through implementation workflows. Use when orchestrating multiple agents, managing workflow phases, or determining autonomous execution mode.

Implements React/TypeScript unit, integration, and browser E2E tests with the repository's configured runner, mocks, setup, and browser harness. Use when creating or completing frontend tests and generated test skeletons.

Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.

React/TypeScript frontend development rules including type safety, component design, state management, and error handling. Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features.

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal te

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

Collects compact repository evidence for scope confirmation, technical option selection, complete design, and verification. Use before Design Doc creation when repository facts can change scope, reuse, contracts, cost, or proof.

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Close a finished session: sweep for unfinished work, ask once, land, file the follow-ups, hand off, tell the sessions that depend on this one, then archive.

Write the repository handoff file for the next session, and record any durable learning.

Merge an approved pull request, clean up its worktree and branch, then check whether a release is due.

Turn a topic or issue into a plan the reviewer approves in the native plan pane.

Answer a research question with parallel read-only gatherers and one synthesized digest.

Review the branch's diff in two fresh contexts — scope against the spec, then quality — and report findings only.

Audit infra security: secrets, deps, CI/CD, webhooks, AI/skill files

Audit Solana program code for exploitable bugs and write a findings report

Compare per-instruction CU with the stored baseline to catch regressions

Build the web client (Next.js, Vite, React) and check env, types and bundle

Build Solana programs (Anchor, Pinocchio, native), incl. verifiable builds

Build the Unity project in batchmode for WebGL, desktop, Android or PSG1

Turn a solana-ai-kit fork into a project: set up CLAUDE.md, remove kit files

Un-ignore and commit the kit config dir, instruction file, .mcp.json and .gitmodules

Replay a user's failing transaction on forked state and map the error to source

Deploy a program to devnet, or to mainnet after the user's explicit go-ahead

Review the branch diff for Solana security issues, CU waste and AI slop

Read-only check of toolchain and kit config, with one fix-it command per failure

Consolidate MEMORY.md and Project Learnings: dedupe, resolve conflicts, prune

Explain Solana code with a diagram and a step-by-step walkthrough

Your efficient agentic AI coding CLI assistant

AI coding with Aegis governance built into execution: baseline-aware changes, evidence-backed delivery. Free desktop client, your choice of model. 将哲科思维融入 AI 开发…

Android in docker solution with noVNC supported, video recording, mcp server and AI-agent