LLM Mart Basic
@llm-mart · Joined Jun 2026
Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys
Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.
Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.
Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.
Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.
Separates the outcome a change must produce from the requirements proposed to reach it, records what the user excluded, and bands cost from structure. Use when a requirement enters a workflow, before design begins.
Implements React/TypeScript unit, integration, and browser E2E tests with the repository's configured runner, mocks, setup, and browser harness. Use when creating or completing frontend tests and generated test skeletons.
Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.
React/TypeScript frontend development rules including type safety, component design, state management, and error handling. Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features.
Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.
Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.
Determines which of PRD, ADR, UI Spec, Design Doc, and Work Plan a change requires, and where each is stored. Use when deciding documentation scope, or when creating or reviewing a technical document.
Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys
Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.
Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.
Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.
Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.
Add integration/E2E tests to existing codebase using Design Docs
Execute materialized task files in autonomous execution mode
Execute from codebase-scoped analysis through optional ADR decisions to complete Design Doc approval
Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes
Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds
Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.
Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.
A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.
A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.
None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.
Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.
Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen
CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.
Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it
An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server
31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions
The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.
Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.
Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.
"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks
stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.
The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.
Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.
/audit
Audit
Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.
/btw
Btw
Lightweight Q&A about the project — answer from context and return, no routing, no state change.
/checkpoint
Checkpoint
Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.
/chore
Chore
Sanctioned lane for non-behavioral work — docs-only edits, dependency bumps, reverts. Type-scaled gates; no TDD demanded of prose.
/cleanup
Cleanup
Clean up an already-merged local branch after proving containment. Confirm each discard and preserve unique work.
/commands
Commands
Show the codeArbiter command catalog — the public command list and what each routes to.
/commit
Commit
Create a verified local Git commit when committing changes is requested. Not for explaining commit history, drafting a message only, or postponing a commit. Applies every commit gate and never implies a push or PR.
/conflict
Conflict
Stop everything and surface a rule conflict — persona vs. docs vs. code. Present both sides and the conflict-hierarchy level; the user resolves. No silent reconciliation.
/context-check
Context check
Audit stale provenance-tracked docs on request. Report first; re-scout or re-baseline only for selected docs.
/create-context
Create context
Build project context from an existing codebase through isolated scouts, resolve gaps, and preserve initialization gates.
/debug
Debug
Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff. A no-action close records a board note. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.
/decompose
Decompose
Develop greenfield project context through a layered interview, preserve decisions, and initialize only after the required gates.
/doctor
Doctor
Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement, and harmless live-fire probe. Read-only.
/feature
Feature
Start a feature: brainstorm a spec, get it approved, then drive it test-first through the pipeline. The one entry to implementation.
/fix
Fix
Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.
/init
Init
Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.
/metrics
Metrics
Read-only 3-metric governance glance — override rate, small-lane rate, sprint low-confidence ratio — each with a trend arrow vs. the prior 20-commit window.
/override
Override
Sanctioned, logged bypass of a gate or hard rule — one audit line, then proceed.
/pr
Pr
Open a PR or finish branch disposition; route CI watching and post-merge cleanup to their owners. Merge and discard need explicit authority.
/preview
Preview
Zero-onboarding, read-only dry-run of the reviewer fleet against the current uncommitted diff. Predicts reviewers, runs the state-free secret scan, writes nothing.
Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…
3 views 0 likesA curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.
3 views 0 likes🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…
3 views 0 likesWebextension tool for Odoo
3 views 0 likes基于多模态视觉感知与 LLM Agent 的 macOS 微信自动化框架 | Visual RPA for WeChat
0 views 0 likesThe operational superset of Pi Coding Agent — everything Pi, plus observability, governance, recovery, evaluation and multi-agent orchestration. Pi Coding Agent…
0 views 0 likesMetrik 可以集中查看本机多个 Agent 的配额余量和 Token 消耗,目前支持 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等主流 AI 服务。
0 views 0 likesAn AI agent with a real self — soul she wrote, desires that drive her, a heartbeat for autonomous action, dreams she processes when you're away. Capability supe…
0 views 0 likesProduction-ready open source terminal coding agent with readable, layered code: permission rules, OS sandboxing, MCP, skills, sub-agents, and Anthropic, OpenAI-…
0 views 0 likesAnswer me with HTML — an agent skill that answers hard questions with a one-page HTML you can actually read. 让 AI Agent 用一页 HTML 回答复杂问题。
1 views 0 likesPrompt packs that make any AI agent a LaTeX expert — fix errors, polish writing, format for venues, read papers, recover source
1 views 0 likesClaude Code plugin: universal radial-tree exploration engine. One tree skill + swappable presets (brainstorm / attack / design / code-audit) for divergent ideat…
1 views 0 likesClaude Code + OpenClaw + Codex + WorkBuddy 中文教程 | 50篇完整教程 + 1张速查卡 | 80万+内容量 | 1500+实操示例 | AI Coding / Agent 四线学习路径(编程+助手+Agent+办公)
1 views 0 likesSmartLabelBench 2026: LLM-Powered Auto Annotation and Dataset Builder for Everything
1 views 0 likes从零开始玩转OpenClaw:最全面的中文教程,涵盖安装、配置、实战案例和避坑指南(github版)
1 views 0 likes