LLM Mart Basic

Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys

Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.

Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.

Separates the outcome a change must produce from the requirements proposed to reach it, records what the user excluded, and bands cost from structure. Use when a requirement enters a workflow, before design begins.

Implements React/TypeScript unit, integration, and browser E2E tests with the repository's configured runner, mocks, setup, and browser harness. Use when creating or completing frontend tests and generated test skeletons.

Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.

React/TypeScript frontend development rules including type safety, component design, state management, and error handling. Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features.

Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.

Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.

Determines which of PRD, ADR, UI Spec, Design Doc, and Work Plan a change requires, and where each is stored. Use when deciding documentation scope, or when creating or reviewing a technical document.

Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys

Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.

Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.

Add integration/E2E tests to existing codebase using Design Docs

Execute materialized task files in autonomous execution mode

Execute from codebase-scoped analysis through optional ADR decisions to complete Design Doc approval

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

Implement issues (GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket) using progressive analyze-specify-plan-implement workflow

Address PR/MR review feedback by reading comments, implementing fixes, and resolving threads. GitHub and GitLab support.

Retrospective analysis and improvement of workflow components with self-evolving patterns

Fix broken functionality from pasted error output, stack traces, or

Summarize recent git history since a baseline with structured analysis of what changed, why, and what to watch for.

Consolidate ephemeral LLM-generated markdown into permanent documentation.

Review pull requests with scope validation, code analysis, and line comments. Supports GitHub PRs and GitLab MRs.

Prepare a PR end-to-end by updating documentation, running tests, dogfooding checks, and validating with code review.

Batch-resolve unresolved PR/MR review threads via GraphQL API (GitHub/GitLab)

Detect and fix drift between plugin.json registrations and capabilities reference documentation

Update pre-commit hooks and CI/CD workflows based on recent project changes

Scan and update dependencies across all ecosystems with conflict detection

Update project documentation with consolidation, debloating, AI slop detection, capabilities sync, and accuracy verification.

Audit and sync plugin.json registrations with actual disk contents. Detects missing or stale skills, commands, agents, hooks.

Review and update test coverage using TDD/BDD methodology with quality validation. Generates tests for changed code.

Generate or update tutorials with VHS and Playwright recordings

Bump project versions using git-workspace-review and version-updates skills.

Generate and self-execute a diff-derived test plan for a PR. Reads

Generate new documentation with human-quality writing.

Clean up AI-generated content and improve documentation quality.

Open-source, self-hosted AI media server. One server replaces your entire media stack, with a web app, native iPhone app, and an AI agent that gets things done.…

A curated list of tools built for Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

🦦 Crayotter: A Multimodal AI-Agent for Video-Editing, Video-Composing, and Video Production. Powered by Multimodal LLMs for autonomous Text-to-Video agentic fr…

Webextension tool for Odoo

基于多模态视觉感知与 LLM Agent 的 macOS 微信自动化框架 | Visual RPA for WeChat

The operational superset of Pi Coding Agent — everything Pi, plus observability, governance, recovery, evaluation and multi-agent orchestration. Pi Coding Agent…

Metrik 可以集中查看本机多个 Agent 的配额余量和 Token 消耗，目前支持 ChatGPT、Claude、GLM、Kimi 等主流 AI 服务。

An AI agent with a real self — soul she wrote, desires that drive her, a heartbeat for autonomous action, dreams she processes when you're away. Capability supe…

Production-ready open source terminal coding agent with readable, layered code: permission rules, OS sandboxing, MCP, skills, sub-agents, and Anthropic, OpenAI-…

Answer me with HTML — an agent skill that answers hard questions with a one-page HTML you can actually read. 让 AI Agent 用一页 HTML 回答复杂问题。

Prompt packs that make any AI agent a LaTeX expert — fix errors, polish writing, format for venues, read papers, recover source

Claude Code plugin: universal radial-tree exploration engine. One tree skill + swappable presets (brainstorm / attack / design / code-audit) for divergent ideat…

Claude Code + OpenClaw + Codex + WorkBuddy 中文教程 | 50篇完整教程 + 1张速查卡 | 80万+内容量 | 1500+实操示例 | AI Coding / Agent 四线学习路径（编程+助手+Agent+办公）

SmartLabelBench 2026: LLM-Powered Auto Annotation and Dataset Builder for Everything

从零开始玩转OpenClaw：最全面的中文教程，涵盖安装、配置、实战案例和避坑指南（github版）