LLM Mart Basic

Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys

Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.

Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.

Separates the outcome a change must produce from the requirements proposed to reach it, records what the user excluded, and bands cost from structure. Use when a requirement enters a workflow, before design begins.

Implements React/TypeScript unit, integration, and browser E2E tests with the repository's configured runner, mocks, setup, and browser harness. Use when creating or completing frontend tests and generated test skeletons.

Language-agnostic testing principles including TDD, test quality, coverage standards, and test design patterns. Use when writing tests, designing test strategies, or reviewing test quality.

React/TypeScript frontend development rules including type safety, component design, state management, and error handling. Use when implementing React components, TypeScript code, or frontend features.

Applies language-agnostic and backend technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and quality gates. Use when reviewing general/backend implementation choices, code smells, failures, or implementation completeness.

Language-agnostic coding principles for maintainability, readability, and quality. Use when implementing features, refactoring code, or reviewing code quality.

Determines which of PRD, ADR, UI Spec, Design Doc, and Work Plan a change requires, and where each is stored. Use when deciding documentation scope, or when creating or reviewing a technical document.

Records where resources outside the repository live (design source, design system, API schema, IaC source, secret store) and how design, implementation, and verification reach them. Use when work depends on an external resource, or when the user mentions design source, design sys

Applies React/TypeScript-specific technical decision criteria, anti-pattern detection, debugging, and frontend quality gates. Use when reviewing components, hooks, browser behavior, or frontend implementation completeness.

Implementation strategy selection framework. Use when planning implementation strategy, selecting development approach, or defining verification criteria.

Integration and E2E test design principles, ROI calculation, test skeleton specification, and review criteria. Use when designing integration tests, E2E tests, or reviewing test quality.

Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.

Add integration/E2E tests to existing codebase using Design Docs

Execute materialized task files in autonomous execution mode

Execute from codebase-scoped analysis through optional ADR decisions to complete Design Doc approval

Fourteen posts of being wrong in production, compressed to checkboxes

Healthy nodes, a quiet network, 300 restarts in three days, and a latency budget measured in milliseconds

Discovery worked. Ping worked. Every TCP connection timed out, and later the tunnel only worked when someone had a terminal open.

Every VM came back. The cluster did not. Declarative systems converge on config, and the datapath isn't config.

A surprising share of AI-in-the-terminal failures aren't the AI. They're zsh, and a version of bash from 2006.

A Claude Code plugin turns standalone project configuration into a namespaced, installable extension that teams and communities can update as one unit.

None of the safety came from the model. It came from six boring habits.

Skills package instructions and references. Subagents run work in a separate context and return results. They solve different problems and can be composed deliberately.

Six hours in, one step left, everything green, and the incident that didn't happen

CLAUDE.md carries persistent project context. Skills load reusable procedures when relevant. Separating stable facts from task-specific workflows keeps both easier to maintain.

Twenty minutes recovering secrets that never existed, and the one sentence from a human that ended it

An API request routing a model's tool call through an approval gate to a remote MCP server

31 config keys, two audits, and why the first one was wrong in both directions

The official MCP Registry stores standardized server metadata rather than package code. Publishers verify a namespace, describe installation or remote access, and submit immutable versions.

Everyone looks at the Dockerfile. The file that actually leaked the key was the project file.

Remote MCP authorization uses established OAuth standards, but secure integration still requires issuer validation, least-privilege scopes, protected token handling, and server-side enforcement.

"Copy it over and switch the reference" is two steps, and the outage lives in the one nobody checks

stdio fits local processes and prototypes. Streamable HTTP fits hosted services and shared integrations. The right choice follows where the capability runs and who must reach it.

The most important rule wasn't about what I could change. It was about what I was allowed to display.

Tools perform operations, resources expose readable context, and prompts provide reusable templates. Choosing the correct primitive makes an MCP server easier to understand and govern.

`crabbox attach` follows the recorded events of an active coordinator run and

`crabbox azure` groups Azure provider setup commands. It currently has a single

`crabbox bench` records and reports local benchmark timing observations. It is a

`crabbox cache` inspects, purges, or warms package and build caches on a

`crabbox capsule` captures, replays, and tracks lightweight failure capsules.

Save the state of a lease, then restore it onto another box or fork it into a

`crabbox claims list` prints the lease claims stored on the current machine. It

`crabbox cleanup` sweeps direct-provider machines and local provider state that

`crabbox code` bridges a Linux lease's `code-server` workspace into the

`crabbox config` inspects and updates user configuration. It has three

`crabbox connect` resolves a lease and opens an interactive SSH session to it.

`crabbox cp` copies files or directories between the host and a Crabbox-owned

`crabbox desktop` drives a visible desktop session on a lease that was warmed

`crabbox doctor` runs a preflight before you commit to a long workflow. It is

`crabbox egress` gives a lease mediated outbound network: a lease-local browser

`crabbox events` prints the broker's event log for a recorded run.

`crabbox heartbeat` refreshes the idle deadline for one owned lease and prints

`crabbox history` lists recorded remote command runs from the broker. Each run is

`crabbox image` holds the trusted-operator controls for provider base images:

`crabbox init` onboards the current repository: it writes the minimal config

Open-source MCP servers for Latin American commerce — Pix, NF-e, banking, fiscal, logistics, and messaging across Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, an…

pi coding agent in a technicolor web trenchcoat

Open-source AI Search Intelligence Platform — track, analyze, and improve AI visibility, citations, prompts, competitors, and content opportunities across ChatG…

Open-source toolkit for the QVeris capability routing network: CLI, MCP server, Python SDK, skills, and REST API docs for agents to discover, inspect, call, and…

⚡ The Complete X/Twitter Automation Toolkit — Scrapers, MCP server for AI agents (Claude/GPT), CLI, browser scripts. No API fees. Open source. Unfollow people w…

The AI agent that interacts with you in the real world.

Offline Codex Desktop migration for Windows and macOS.

LLM 驱动的多市场股票智能分析系统：多源行情、实时新闻、决策看板与自动推送，支持零成本定时运行。 LLM-powered multi-market stock analysis system with multi-source market data, real-time news, decision dashbo…

Your smart, reliable, and friendly personal AI assistant.

The LLM Anti-Framework

A general-purpose AIGC video engine: script to finished film in one pipeline — dramas, ads, product videos, otome games, and more. | 通用 AIGC 视频引擎 —— 从剧本到成片一条流水线…

GTM agent for technical founders. Pay-per-result. Signed receipts. Two surfaces: terminal CLI + local web dashboard.

Desktop automation MCP server — computer use for any AI agent: control screen, windows, mouse/keyboard, and Chrome via Model Context Protocol (stdio)

DeepSeek Harness (dsh) Windows desktop client - bundled Node.js + dsh CLI, one-click launch

Open-source, real-time collaborative AI canvas - notes, mini-apps, and agents on one infinite board.

MCPSafari: Native Safari MCP Server for AI Agents

197 bioinformatics & life science skills for Claude Code and AI agents — BixBench 92.0% accuracy. RNA-seq, single-cell, drug discovery, proteomics, and more. Po…

The AI agent with a wallet — spends USDC autonomously to get real work done. Apache-2.0, TypeScript.

The fastest browser for AI agents to run browser automation, built for sharing your logged-in browser state with your AI agents, like Codex or Claude Code, with…

Ouroboros — self-creating AI agent. Born Feb 16, 2026.