Claude Skill

mergers-and-acquisitions

Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or w

LLM Mart · 0 points · 17 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download cbrock84-headcount-plugins_corporate-strategy_skills_mergers-and-acquisitions-98d1c17.zip · 2 KB
Part of cbrock84/headcount — 160 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount/tree/main/plugins/corporate-strategy/skills/mergers-and-acquisitions
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install cbrock84-headcount@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole cbrock84/headcount collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Mergers and acquisitions

Deal execution requires qualified legal, tax, and accounting advisers. This structures the commercial thinking and identifies what needs specialist work; it does not substitute for it.

The thesis comes first, and in writing

Before looking at any target: what would an acquisition get us that we cannot build or partner our way to, and why is buying better?

Legitimate theses are specific — a capability that would take three years to build, access to a customer base we cannot reach, consolidation economics in a fragmenting market, a team with scarce expertise.

Illegitimate theses, all common: growth for its own sake, defensive panic, the target became available, and the belief that two struggling businesses combine into a healthy one.

Write the thesis before the target. A thesis reverse-engineered to fit an available company will justify anything.

Screening

Score candidates against the thesis, not against how impressive they are. The best target is frequently the boring one that fits precisely.

Assess cultural and operating-model fit early rather than as a soft afterthought. Integration failure is the most common way deals destroy value, and its causes are visible before signing — incompatible decision-making, different customer commitments, a founder who will not stay.

Valuation framing

Two numbers matter and they are different: what it is worth to you given the synergies you can actually realize, and what you would pay, which must be lower.

Be brutal about synergies. Cost synergies are real and estimable; revenue synergies are usually optimistic and rarely arrive on schedule. Model the deal without revenue synergies and see whether it still works — if it only works with them, it probably does not work.

Name your walk-away price before negotiating, and treat it as binding. Deal momentum is a powerful force and it is not evidence.

Diligence

Commercial diligence answers whether the thesis is true: are the customers real, is the retention as claimed, does the growth come from where they say. Financial, legal, and technical diligence run alongside with specialists.

The questions most often skipped and most often fatal: what is the customer concentration, what happens to the key people at close, what liabilities transfer, and what is running on infrastructure or contracts nobody has documented.

Diligence exists to falsify the thesis. Diligence run to confirm it will confirm it.

Integration

Plan it before signing, not after. Decide in advance: what integrates, what stays separate, who runs it, and what the first hundred days look like.

The predictable value destroyers are attrition of the people you bought, customer churn during transition, and a stalled integration that leaves two of everything indefinitely. Each is foreseeable and each is planned around, or it is not.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Proceed with a thesis that changed to fit the target.
  • Treat the signed deal as the finish line. It is the start of the part that determines whether it worked.
Files (headcount)
  • references
    • sources.md 1.9 KB
      # Sources — `corporate-strategy:mergers-and-acquisitions`
      
      <!-- Generated by scripts/build-sources.py from sources/*.toml. Do not edit. -->
      
      Check these before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. The use note on each one is binding: most of what a professional cites is free to read and not free to reproduce.
      
      ## EDGAR full-text search and submissions API
      
      US Securities and Exchange Commission · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely
      
      <https://www.sec.gov/edgar/search-and-access>
      
      Machine-readable: <https://www.sec.gov/search-filings/edgar-application-programming-interfaces>
      
      **Authoritative for:** What public companies actually reported, in their own filings — the primary source for a competitor's economics, a comparable's margin structure, or how a peer disclosed an accounting policy.
      
      ## Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification program
      
      US Federal Trade Commission · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely
      
      <https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program>
      
      **Authoritative for:** Whether a transaction must be reported before closing, at what size, and how long the parties must then wait. A threshold question with one right answer — and the thresholds are revised annually, so resolve them here rather than from memory.
      
      ## Merger Guidelines
      
      US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely
      
      <https://www.ftc.gov/reports/merger-guidelines-2023>
      
      **Authoritative for:** Whether an acquisition is likely to be challenged — the concentration thresholds, how the agencies define a market, and the theories of harm they actually apply. The closest thing to a decision procedure for whether you can buy someone.
      
      ---
      
      Sources are maintained in `sources/` upstream, not here. If one is wrong, out of date, or missing, fix it there — this file is regenerated and an edit to it is lost.
      
  • SKILL.md 3.7 KB
    ---
    name: mergers-and-acquisitions
    description: Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated.
    ---
    
    # Mergers and acquisitions
    
    > Deal execution requires qualified legal, tax, and accounting advisers. This structures the
    > commercial thinking and identifies what needs specialist work; it does not substitute for it.
    
    ## The thesis comes first, and in writing
    
    Before looking at any target: what would an acquisition get us that we cannot build or partner our
    way to, and why is buying better?
    
    Legitimate theses are specific — a capability that would take three years to build, access to a
    customer base we cannot reach, consolidation economics in a fragmenting market, a team with scarce
    expertise.
    
    Illegitimate theses, all common: growth for its own sake, defensive panic, the target became
    available, and the belief that two struggling businesses combine into a healthy one.
    
    **Write the thesis before the target.** A thesis reverse-engineered to fit an available company will
    justify anything.
    
    ## Screening
    
    Score candidates against the thesis, not against how impressive they are. The best target is
    frequently the boring one that fits precisely.
    
    Assess cultural and operating-model fit early rather than as a soft afterthought. Integration failure
    is the most common way deals destroy value, and its causes are visible before signing — incompatible
    decision-making, different customer commitments, a founder who will not stay.
    
    ## Valuation framing
    
    Two numbers matter and they are different: what it is worth **to you** given the synergies you can
    actually realize, and what you would **pay**, which must be lower.
    
    Be brutal about synergies. Cost synergies are real and estimable; revenue synergies are usually
    optimistic and rarely arrive on schedule. Model the deal without revenue synergies and see whether it
    still works — if it only works with them, it probably does not work.
    
    Name your walk-away price before negotiating, and treat it as binding. Deal momentum is a powerful
    force and it is not evidence.
    
    ## Diligence
    
    Commercial diligence answers whether the thesis is true: are the customers real, is the retention as
    claimed, does the growth come from where they say. Financial, legal, and technical diligence run
    alongside with specialists.
    
    The questions most often skipped and most often fatal: what is the customer concentration, what
    happens to the key people at close, what liabilities transfer, and what is running on infrastructure
    or contracts nobody has documented.
    
    Diligence exists to falsify the thesis. Diligence run to confirm it will confirm it.
    
    ## Integration
    
    Plan it before signing, not after. Decide in advance: what integrates, what stays separate, who
    runs it, and what the first hundred days look like.
    
    The predictable value destroyers are attrition of the people you bought, customer churn during
    transition, and a stalled integration that leaves two of everything indefinitely. Each is
    foreseeable and each is planned around, or it is not.
    
    ## Sources
    
    `references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
    here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
    answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
    to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
    
    ## Never
    
    - Proceed with a thesis that changed to fit the target.
    - Treat the signed deal as the finish line. It is the start of the part that determines whether it
      worked.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related