Claude Skill

listing-distribution

Gets a product listed where buyers and crawlers look — directories, marketplaces, review sites, comparison pages, and aggregators. Use this to plan a submission push, choose which directories are worth the effort, prepare listing assets, build comparison and alternative pages, or

LLM Mart · 0 points · 17 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download cbrock84-headcount-plugins_demand-generation_skills_listing-distribution-98d1c17.zip · 2 KB
Part of cbrock84/headcount — 160 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount/tree/main/plugins/demand-generation/skills/listing-distribution
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install cbrock84-headcount@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole cbrock84/headcount collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Listing distribution

Low effort, compounding, and consistently under-done. Also easy to do in a way that wastes weeks.

Choosing where to list

Judge each by whether real buyers use it, not by domain authority. The directories worth the time are the ones your buyers already consult during evaluation.

  • Category review sites — highest value where they exist for your category. Buyers read these during active evaluation.
  • Curated niche directories — moderate traffic, good qualification, usually a real editorial bar.
  • Launch platforms — a spike, not a channel. Worth doing once, with preparation.
  • Bulk submission lists — mostly worthless, and the low-quality end carries real risk. Skip them.

Preparing once, reusing everywhere

Assemble a kit before submitting anywhere: descriptions at several lengths, logo and screenshots at the common sizes, category selections, feature list, pricing summary, and the founder or company details these forms always want. Submissions then take minutes instead of an afternoon each.

Keep the positioning identical across listings. Inconsistent descriptions across directories are both a brand problem and a signal problem.

Review platforms

The listings that most influence buyers. Claim the profile, complete it fully, and keep it current — a stale listing with old pricing costs deals.

Ask for reviews from customers at a success moment, never with an incentive tied to sentiment. Respond to every negative review specifically and without defensiveness; prospects read the responses more carefully than the reviews.

Comparison and alternative pages

Pages targeting "X versus Y" and "alternatives to X" capture buyers already in evaluation, which is the highest-intent traffic available.

Write them honestly. Name where the competitor is genuinely better — a comparison that finds you superior on every axis is not believed, and buyers checking it against their own experience will discount the whole page. Keep them current; a comparison against a competitor's two-year-old feature set is worse than nothing.

Maintaining

Set a periodic sweep: listings drift out of date, and an aggregator showing your old pricing will outrank your own page for some queries.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • List everywhere available. Directories with no traffic cost maintenance and dilute nothing but your attention.
  • Let listing copy drift from the positioning of record. Every stale listing is a competing description of the product.
  • Solicit reviews only after a customer complains, or only from customers you know are happy. Both distort the signal you are buying.
Files (headcount)
  • references
    • sources.md 1.7 KB
      # Sources — `demand-generation:listing-distribution`
      
      <!-- Generated by scripts/build-sources.py from sources/*.toml. Do not edit. -->
      
      Check these before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. The use note on each one is binding: most of what a professional cites is free to read and not free to reproduce.
      
      ## Product data specification
      
      Google · global · **read and cite only — copyrighted, do not reproduce**
      
      <https://support.google.com/merchants/answer/7052112>
      
      **Authoritative for:** The required attributes, formats and accepted values for a product feed — whether a listing is accepted is a specification question rather than an opinion.
      
      ## Schema.org vocabulary
      
      Schema.org community group · global · CC BY-SA — quote with attribution; share-alike, so do not fold into this repository
      
      <https://schema.org/>
      
      Machine-readable: <https://schema.org/version/latest/schemaorg-current-https.jsonld>
      
      **Authoritative for:** The canonical property names and expected types for structured markup. Share-alike, so cite and link rather than folding definitions into your own documentation.
      
      ## Structured data markup that Google Search supports
      
      Google · global · CC BY — quote with attribution
      
      <https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/search-gallery>
      
      **Authoritative for:** Which structured data types Google actually acts on, as opposed to which exist in the vocabulary. Pair it with schema.org: one defines the vocabulary, the other says what is honored.
      
      ---
      
      Sources are maintained in `sources/` upstream, not here. If one is wrong, out of date, or missing, fix it there — this file is regenerated and an edit to it is lost.
      
  • SKILL.md 3.3 KB
    ---
    name: listing-distribution
    description: Gets a product listed where buyers and crawlers look — directories, marketplaces, review sites, comparison pages, and aggregators. Use this to plan a submission push, choose which directories are worth the effort, prepare listing assets, build comparison and alternative pages, or manage presence on review platforms.
    ---
    
    # Listing distribution
    
    Low effort, compounding, and consistently under-done. Also easy to do in a way that wastes weeks.
    
    ## Choosing where to list
    
    Judge each by whether real buyers use it, not by domain authority. The directories worth the time
    are the ones your buyers already consult during evaluation.
    
    - **Category review sites** — highest value where they exist for your category. Buyers read these
      during active evaluation.
    - **Curated niche directories** — moderate traffic, good qualification, usually a real editorial
      bar.
    - **Launch platforms** — a spike, not a channel. Worth doing once, with preparation.
    - **Bulk submission lists** — mostly worthless, and the low-quality end carries real risk. Skip
      them.
    
    ## Preparing once, reusing everywhere
    
    Assemble a kit before submitting anywhere: descriptions at several lengths, logo and screenshots at
    the common sizes, category selections, feature list, pricing summary, and the founder or company
    details these forms always want. Submissions then take minutes instead of an afternoon each.
    
    Keep the positioning identical across listings. Inconsistent descriptions across directories are
    both a brand problem and a signal problem.
    
    ## Review platforms
    
    The listings that most influence buyers. Claim the profile, complete it fully, and keep it current —
    a stale listing with old pricing costs deals.
    
    Ask for reviews from customers at a success moment, never with an incentive tied to sentiment.
    Respond to every negative review specifically and without defensiveness; prospects read the
    responses more carefully than the reviews.
    
    ## Comparison and alternative pages
    
    Pages targeting "X versus Y" and "alternatives to X" capture buyers already in evaluation, which is
    the highest-intent traffic available.
    
    Write them honestly. Name where the competitor is genuinely better — a comparison that finds you
    superior on every axis is not believed, and buyers checking it against their own experience will
    discount the whole page. Keep them current; a comparison against a competitor's two-year-old feature
    set is worse than nothing.
    
    ## Maintaining
    
    Set a periodic sweep: listings drift out of date, and an aggregator showing your old pricing will
    outrank your own page for some queries.
    
    ## Sources
    
    `references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
    here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
    answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
    to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
    
    ## Never
    
    - List everywhere available. Directories with no traffic cost maintenance and dilute nothing but your attention.
    - Let listing copy drift from the positioning of record. Every stale listing is a competing description of the product.
    - Solicit reviews only after a customer complains, or only from customers you know are happy. Both distort the signal you are buying.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related