Claude Skill

compensation-and-leveling

Builds and maintains the leveling framework and pay structure — level definitions, salary bands, benchmarking, pay equity, and how raises and promotions are decided. Use this to design or revise leveling, set or adjust salary bands, benchmark against market, handle a compensation

LLM Mart · 0 points · 17 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download cbrock84-headcount-plugins_people_skills_compensation-and-leveling-98d1c17.zip · 2 KB
Part of cbrock84/headcount — 160 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount/tree/main/plugins/people/skills/compensation-and-leveling
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install cbrock84-headcount@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole cbrock84/headcount collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Compensation and leveling

Compensation touches employment law, pay transparency requirements, and equal pay obligations that vary by jurisdiction. Structural work here is fine; specific decisions about individuals should be reviewed by qualified counsel or an HR professional.

Leveling first

Pay structure without a leveling framework produces negotiated salaries, and negotiated salaries produce inequity that correlates with who negotiates hardest.

Define each level by scope and impact, not tenure or task list:

  • What ambiguity can they handle — a defined task, a defined problem, an undefined problem, a problem nobody has identified?
  • What is the blast radius of their decisions — their work, their team, the function, the company?
  • What do they do for others: execute, contribute, guide, or set direction?

Levels must be distinguishable in a sentence. If two adjacent levels cannot be told apart by someone who does not know the people in them, they are one level.

Bands

For each level, benchmark against a market defined by the roles you actually compete with for candidates — not the whole industry, and not aspirational peers.

  • Set a target position (at market, above, or below) and state it as policy rather than deciding case by case.
  • Bands wide enough to allow growth within a level, narrow enough to mean something.
  • Re-benchmark on a schedule. Markets move, and bands that do not move create compression that eventually costs more to fix than to prevent.

Compression and equity

Compression — new hires paid near or above tenured staff — is the predictable result of moving markets and static internal pay. It is corrosive because it is discovered, and it is always discovered.

Run a pay equity analysis on a schedule: pay by level, controlling for level and location, disaggregated by demographic. Where a gap exists, fix it directly rather than waiting for the next cycle. Findings here need qualified review before action.

Decisions

  • Raises for sustained performance at level, promotions for sustained performance at the next level. A promotion is recognition that someone is already operating there, not a bet that they will.
  • Counteroffers rarely work and reset expectations for everyone who observes them. Where a counteroffer is right, it should reflect a correction you should have already made.
  • Every exception is a precedent. Document the reasoning, because you will be asked to repeat it.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Tooling

Benchmark data is the purchase that matters, and it is where the scale tier is real: free and crowd-sourced ranges are directional at best; Pave, Carta Total Comp or Option Impact suit venture -backed companies; Radford, Mercer or Willis Towers Watson are the surveys large employers price against, and similar.

Administration: the compensation module of the HRIS, or CompTrack, Assemble, and similar.

Whatever the source, know its effective date, its scope, and how it defines the level you are matching to. Two surveys disagreeing usually means they are describing different jobs.

Never

  • Set an individual's pay before their level is settled.
  • Use a candidate's prior salary as an input. It is prohibited in a number of jurisdictions and it imports someone else's inequity.
  • Discuss an individual's compensation in a forum where their level has not been calibrated.
Files (headcount)
  • references
    • sources.md 1.3 KB
      # Sources — `people:compensation-and-leveling`
      
      <!-- Generated by scripts/build-sources.py from sources/*.toml. Do not edit. -->
      
      Check these before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. The use note on each one is binding: most of what a professional cites is free to read and not free to reproduce.
      
      ## 29 CFR Part 541 — exemption regulations
      
      US Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely
      
      <https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-V/subchapter-A/part-541>
      
      **Authoritative for:** Whether a role can lawfully be classified exempt — the salary basis, salary level and duties tests. Organization design is judgment, but which levels may be exempt and what a manager must actually do is settled law.
      
      ## Consolidated State Minimum Wage and Overtime tables
      
      US Department of Labor · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely
      
      <https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/state/minimum-wage/history>
      
      **Authoritative for:** State-by-state minimum wage and state overtime rules in one maintained table, where the binding figure is whichever of state or federal is higher.
      
      ---
      
      Sources are maintained in `sources/` upstream, not here. If one is wrong, out of date, or missing, fix it there — this file is regenerated and an edit to it is lost.
      
  • SKILL.md 4.1 KB
    ---
    name: compensation-and-leveling
    description: Builds and maintains the leveling framework and pay structure — level definitions, salary bands, benchmarking, pay equity, and how raises and promotions are decided. Use this to design or revise leveling, set or adjust salary bands, benchmark against market, handle a compensation request or counteroffer, run a review cycle, or diagnose pay compression and equity issues.
    ---
    
    # Compensation and leveling
    
    > Compensation touches employment law, pay transparency requirements, and equal pay obligations that
    > vary by jurisdiction. Structural work here is fine; specific decisions about individuals should be
    > reviewed by qualified counsel or an HR professional.
    
    ## Leveling first
    
    Pay structure without a leveling framework produces negotiated salaries, and negotiated salaries
    produce inequity that correlates with who negotiates hardest.
    
    Define each level by **scope and impact**, not tenure or task list:
    
    - What ambiguity can they handle — a defined task, a defined problem, an undefined problem, a
      problem nobody has identified?
    - What is the blast radius of their decisions — their work, their team, the function, the company?
    - What do they do for others: execute, contribute, guide, or set direction?
    
    Levels must be distinguishable in a sentence. If two adjacent levels cannot be told apart by
    someone who does not know the people in them, they are one level.
    
    ## Bands
    
    For each level, benchmark against a market defined by the roles you actually compete with for
    candidates — not the whole industry, and not aspirational peers.
    
    - Set a target position (at market, above, or below) and state it as policy rather than deciding
      case by case.
    - Bands wide enough to allow growth within a level, narrow enough to mean something.
    - Re-benchmark on a schedule. Markets move, and bands that do not move create compression that
      eventually costs more to fix than to prevent.
    
    ## Compression and equity
    
    Compression — new hires paid near or above tenured staff — is the predictable result of moving
    markets and static internal pay. It is corrosive because it is discovered, and it is always
    discovered.
    
    Run a pay equity analysis on a schedule: pay by level, controlling for level and location,
    disaggregated by demographic. Where a gap exists, fix it directly rather than waiting for the next
    cycle. Findings here need qualified review before action.
    
    ## Decisions
    
    - **Raises for sustained performance at level**, promotions for sustained performance at the next
      level. A promotion is recognition that someone is already operating there, not a bet that they
      will.
    - **Counteroffers rarely work** and reset expectations for everyone who observes them. Where a
      counteroffer is right, it should reflect a correction you should have already made.
    - Every exception is a precedent. Document the reasoning, because you will be asked to repeat it.
    
    ## Sources
    
    `references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
    here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
    answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
    to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
    
    ## Tooling
    
    Benchmark data is the purchase that matters, and it is where the scale tier is real: free and
    crowd-sourced ranges are directional at best; Pave, Carta Total Comp or Option Impact suit venture
    -backed companies; Radford, Mercer or Willis Towers Watson are the surveys large employers price
    against, and similar.
    
    Administration: the compensation module of the HRIS, or CompTrack, Assemble, and similar.
    
    Whatever the source, know its effective date, its scope, and how it defines the level you are
    matching to. Two surveys disagreeing usually means they are describing different jobs.
    
    ## Never
    
    - Set an individual's pay before their level is settled.
    - Use a candidate's prior salary as an input. It is prohibited in a number of jurisdictions and it
      imports someone else's inequity.
    - Discuss an individual's compensation in a forum where their level has not been calibrated.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related