brand-identity
Defines and applies visual brand — logo usage, palette, typography, imagery direction, and the guidelines that keep expression consistent across product and marketing surfaces. Use this to establish a brand from scratch, audit whether an existing brand is being applied consistent
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount/tree/main/plugins/product/skills/brand-identity
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install cbrock84-headcount@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/cbrock84/headcount.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole cbrock84/headcount collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Brand identity
Brand is the accumulated impression of every surface someone encounters. Consistency is most of it; the rest is having a point of view.
Establishing
Before any visual decision, settle three things in writing:
- What the brand is for — the promise it makes, in one sentence.
- Who it is for — and, more usefully, who it is not for.
- What it is not — the three adjectives it should never earn. These constrain far better than aspirational ones, because "modern" and "trustworthy" rule nothing out.
The system
Palette. One primary, one accent, a full neutral ramp, and semantic states. The neutral ramp does most of the visible work and gets the least attention — spend time on it. Every color needs a verified contrast ratio against the surfaces it will actually sit on, not against white.
Typography. One display family, one text family, and a rule for when each is used. Both must work at the smallest size they will appear at, on a real device, before selection.
Logo. Define clear space, minimum size, and permitted variants. Then define misuse explicitly: no stretching, no recoloring outside the permitted set, no effects, no re-typesetting the wordmark. Guidelines fail by omission — what is not forbidden gets done.
Imagery. A stated direction, with examples of both what fits and what does not. "Authentic photography" means nothing without a counter-example.
Applying
The test of a brand system is an unfamiliar format: an error email, a conference badge, a slide nobody planned for. If the system does not say what to do, it is a mood board, not a system.
Auditing an existing brand
Collect real surfaces — product, marketing site, email, social, sales collateral — side by side. Look for: palette drift, more type families than the system defines, logo variants nobody sanctioned, and tone that changes between surfaces. Report by severity, and separate what breaks the system from what merely was not specified.
Sources
references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions
here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before
answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free
to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.
Never
- Pick color and type before you know what the brand has to sound like and what it will sit next to.
- Ship a palette you have not checked for contrast at real sizes on real backgrounds.
- Use color alone to carry state, meaning, or error.
- Add a typeface because a page needs variety. Variety comes from weight, size, and spacing inside the system you already have.
Files (headcount)
-
references
-
sources.md 1.6 KB
# Sources — `product:brand-identity` <!-- Generated by scripts/build-sources.py from sources/*.toml. Do not edit. --> Check these before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. The use note on each one is binding: most of what a professional cites is free to read and not free to reproduce. ## Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices US Copyright Office · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely <https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/> **Authoritative for:** What is protectable and registrable, including the Office's position on human authorship for machine-generated material and how much of a layout or typeface is protectable at all. ## SIL Open Font License SIL International · global · **read and cite only — copyrighted, do not reproduce** <https://openfontlicense.org/> **Authoritative for:** Whether a typeface may be embedded in a product, bundled into a design system, modified or redistributed. The font-licensing question that surfaces reliably when a brand system ships. ## Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure US Patent and Trademark Office · US · public domain (US government) — quote freely <https://tmep.uspto.gov/> **Authoritative for:** Whether a proposed name, logo or tagline is registrable — distinctiveness, descriptiveness refusals, likelihood of confusion, specimen requirements. Settles whether you can actually own a name. --- Sources are maintained in `sources/` upstream, not here. If one is wrong, out of date, or missing, fix it there — this file is regenerated and an edit to it is lost.
-
-
SKILL.md 3.1 KB
--- name: brand-identity description: Defines and applies visual brand — logo usage, palette, typography, imagery direction, and the guidelines that keep expression consistent across product and marketing surfaces. Use this to establish a brand from scratch, audit whether an existing brand is being applied consistently, build brand guidelines, or decide how a brand should express itself in an unfamiliar format. --- # Brand identity Brand is the accumulated impression of every surface someone encounters. Consistency is most of it; the rest is having a point of view. ## Establishing Before any visual decision, settle three things in writing: - **What the brand is for** — the promise it makes, in one sentence. - **Who it is for** — and, more usefully, who it is not for. - **What it is not** — the three adjectives it should never earn. These constrain far better than aspirational ones, because "modern" and "trustworthy" rule nothing out. ## The system **Palette.** One primary, one accent, a full neutral ramp, and semantic states. The neutral ramp does most of the visible work and gets the least attention — spend time on it. Every color needs a verified contrast ratio against the surfaces it will actually sit on, not against white. **Typography.** One display family, one text family, and a rule for when each is used. Both must work at the smallest size they will appear at, on a real device, before selection. **Logo.** Define clear space, minimum size, and permitted variants. Then define misuse explicitly: no stretching, no recoloring outside the permitted set, no effects, no re-typesetting the wordmark. Guidelines fail by omission — what is not forbidden gets done. **Imagery.** A stated direction, with examples of both what fits and what does not. "Authentic photography" means nothing without a counter-example. ## Applying The test of a brand system is an unfamiliar format: an error email, a conference badge, a slide nobody planned for. If the system does not say what to do, it is a mood board, not a system. ## Auditing an existing brand Collect real surfaces — product, marketing site, email, social, sales collateral — side by side. Look for: palette drift, more type families than the system defines, logo variants nobody sanctioned, and tone that changes between surfaces. Report by severity, and separate what breaks the system from what merely was not specified. ## Sources `references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding. ## Never - Pick color and type before you know what the brand has to sound like and what it will sit next to. - Ship a palette you have not checked for contrast at real sizes on real backgrounds. - Use color alone to carry state, meaning, or error. - Add a typeface because a page needs variety. Variety comes from weight, size, and spacing inside the system you already have.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.