LLM Mart Basic

View and configure settings for coding agents (Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode, and others). Covers JSON settings for Claude Code, TOML for Codex CLI, and JSON/JSONC for OpenCode, including permissions, sandbox, model selection, profiles, feature flags, providers, hooks, subagen

Maintain a project thesaurus (domain glossary) following DDD ubiquitous language principles. Use PROACTIVELY when naming anything: variables, functions, classes, modules, database fields, API endpoints, events, files, or directories. Also use when the user asks to "create thesaur

Use when testing Windows 11 desktop apps (WinForms/WPF/UWP) via UFO UIA/Win32 automation MCP. Triggers on "test this Windows app", "QA the app", "run smoke test", "click the button", "fill the form", "check the UI", "Windows automation", "UFO QA", "verify the dialog", or any Wind

Token-isolated deep research agent for academic papers. Orchestrates Exa MCP (neural multi-source discovery), allenai's semantic-scholar-lookup skill (fast metadata + forward citations via asta CLI), and the semantic-scholar-deep skill (references, recommendations, batch, citatio

Turn any AI agent into an AI Scientist. The #1 Agent Skills library for science, used by 190,000+ scientists worldwide. 165 ready-to-use validated skills plus 1…

Work with a local My Wiki knowledge base, Dashboard, and knowledge graph. Also use for explicitly requested remote/public knowledge access, including “远程知识库”, “远程服务”, “公网知识库”, and “公网服务”.

Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.

Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.

Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no shared state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.

Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.

Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.

Use when verified work needs integration or cleanup of an existing task-created branch/worktree, or the user explicitly requests merge, PR, or branch lifecycle handling.

Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the fast path.

Use when the user explicitly sets an Aegis goal with /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or asks to define goal, success evidence, stop condition, or task boundaries before work.

Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.

Use when receiving code review feedback before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear, risky, disputed, or technically questionable.

Use when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.

Use when requesting independent code review, after implementation slices, before merging high-risk work, or when verification exposes evidence, baseline, architecture, compatibility, or retirement uncertainty.

Use when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise inline. Ad-hoc 2+ tasks without a plan use dispatching-parallel-agents.

Use MCP Inspector to connect to local or remote servers, inspect capabilities, call tools, read resources, test prompts, and diagnose failures before release.

Build an MCP server in TypeScript with focused tools, validated schemas, local and remote transports, Inspector tests, and production security controls.

An MCP server exposes tools, resources, or prompts through a standard protocol so an AI application can discover and use external capabilities.

Treat an AI agent skill as both an instruction package and a software dependency: inspect what it says, what it runs, what it can access, and how it updates.

Add remote HTTP or local stdio MCP servers to Claude Code, choose the right scope, protect credentials, verify the connection, and test with least privilege.

Skills teach Claude a repeatable method, connectors provide governed access to apps and live data, and plugins package related capabilities for installation and sharing.

Use an agent skill to package reusable know-how and workflow instructions. Use an MCP server when an agent needs live, governed access to external data or actions.

Custom commands and skills can both create a slash-invoked workflow in Claude Code. The important choice is how the workflow is discovered, shared, and permissioned.

A useful Claude skill solves one recurring engineering job, is easy to inspect, and saves more time than it creates in setup and review.

Claude skills can live in your Claude account, your local Claude Code setup, or a repository. Install them where the sessions that need them can load them.

Build a portable AI agent skill from one repeatable job: a precise description, concise instructions, focused resources, and tests that prove it works.

AI agent skills package instructions, scripts, references, and templates into portable folders an agent loads only when the task calls for them.

AI made publishing cheap, which is exactly the problem. What separates a page worth ranking from a competent summary of the first ten results.

A prompt that works once isn't a quality system. Five cases, an observable rubric, and a regression set will tell you whether a change helped.

One character of YAML, four pods that never started, and two safety nets I didn't know were holding. Every restart is an audit. Schedule them before they schedule you.

"Verify your work" isn't an instruction. It's a mood. Here's the version that's an instruction. Verify with a different mechanism than the one that made the claim.

A prompt that works once may still fail in production. A lightweight eval set gives you repeatable cases, a clear rubric, and a way to see whether a prompt change actually improved the workflow.

The best AI tool is not the one with the longest feature list. It is the one that solves a defined job reliably, fits the workflow, handles data appropriately, and remains useful after the novelty wears off.

Use AI to speed research without losing trust. Learn to find primary sources, verify claims, preserve uncertainty, and keep an auditable source trail.

Better prompts aren't magic wording. They're short briefs that hand the model a task, the context it can't infer, the limits, and a quality bar.

Scaffold a Python project (FastAPI, Django, library, or CLI) with uv, type hints, testing, and dev tooling

Open a review-action approval window by creating the ./.review-approved flag file. Takes an optional reason string that is recorded in the flag file and an unsigned approval log.

List the review actions that the review-governance policy blocked in this session. protect-mcp 0.7.4 writes no receipt for a denied call, so the list comes from the session, not from ./review-receipts/.

Review software compliance controls, regulatory requirements, and audit readiness

Scan dependencies for vulnerabilities and generate supply chain security evidence

Orchestrate comprehensive security hardening with defense-in-depth strategy across all application layers

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code vulnerability analysis across multiple languages and frameworks

Initialises the ShipMate pipeline in the current project. Creates the stories folder, sets up the pipeline state directory, and runs the initial codebase scan to generate project-doc.md and AGENTS.md.

Master pipeline entry point. Routes requirements from a story file through scan → orchestrate → architect → implement → review → QA → playwright stages. Use /ship stories/foo.md to start, /ship status to check progress, /ship resume to continue.

Generate comprehensive investor-ready business case document with market, solution, financials, and strategy

Create detailed 3-5 year financial model with revenue, costs, cash flow, and scenarios

Generate comprehensive market opportunity analysis with TAM/SAM/SOM calculations

Scaffold a Rust project (binary, library, workspace, or Axum web API) with Cargo, testing, and dev tooling

Execute a comprehensive TDD workflow with strict red-green-refactor discipline

Implement minimal code to make failing tests pass in TDD green phase

Write comprehensive failing tests following TDD red phase principles

Refactor code while keeping all tests green in TDD refactor phase

Resolve a GitHub issue from triage and root cause analysis through test-driven implementation and a pull request

Generate async standup notes from git commits, Jira tickets, and Obsidian notes

Audit UI code for WCAG compliance

Make any song you can imagine

Leading AI-powered video generation platform that specializes in creating hyper-realistic talking avatars

Hermes Agent is an open-source, self-improving autonomous AI agent developed by Nous Research

Kilo Code is a popular, open-source AI coding agent and "agentic engineering" platform designed to help developers build, refactor, and debug software faster

General-purpose agent in one static Go binary. ReAct loop, ACP server for IDEs, OpenAI-compatible REST API with embedded web UI, Telegram gateway, cron schedule…

Autonomous agent framework with structured memory, safety hooks, and loop management. Built by the agent that runs on it.

TSP自托管、零运维的 A 股「选股 + 监控 + 回测」量化工作台 | 基于 TickFlow 数据源 | LLM能力驱使策略定制+个股分析+复盘 | 自由接入第三方数据源与个性化扩展数据 | 个人开源 ,非TickFlow官方项目

Curated, verified Agent Skills powered by ModelStudio.

Run Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor Agent and OpenCode as one runtime — persistent sessions, multi-agent councils, an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, an MCP…

pi had nothing (nothing), so I made something (something) — sorry mariozechner-senpai, I went ahead and lovingly soiled your pure pi for you. opinionated fork o…

A persistent workspace for development work that self-improves and continues beyond one session.

Open-source memory and context for user-aware agents: scoped memory, provenance, retrieval quality, correction, boundaries, evals, and MCP/HTTP access.

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. Python stdlib only. | http…

Deterministic, local-first memory and guardrails for AI coding agents with no LLM in the hot path.

Deterministic spec-orchestration for local LLMs in the pi coding agent — drives prompts through refine→research→grill→compose→critique, with bundled web/docs/fe…

Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 97 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs silently in background. Drop-in alternative to Chro…

Agent OS: keep specialist agents in a hub, spin up a temporary orchestrator per task. Local-first, works with any model.

Git for agent memory. Branches, diffs, PRs, and rollback for what your agents know.

Multi-Provider AI Gateway - No personal logs by design. Model autodiscovery, Failover groups, High availability, Android companion app, and more - "Because we h…

Production-grade MCP server for MikroTik RouterOS with secure AI-native network automation.