verification-contract
Internal contract: one compact frozen ACCEPTANCE.md per delivery unit, its validation ladder, anti-weakening rules, and blob-bound execution receipt. Consumed by planners, execute-phase, and review-change.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/tree/main/skills/verification-contract
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install gtrabanco-agentic-workflow@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/gtrabanco/agentic-workflow.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole gtrabanco/agentic-workflow collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Verification Contract (internal)
Single owner of the delivery finish line. Planning freezes it; executors may strengthen coverage but cannot move it; review checks the same bytes.
Artifact
Every new feature/fix carries ACCEPTANCE.md beside its SPEC. Copy the matching
repository template. Required parts: Status: frozen; one stable ID per SPEC
criterion; Required outcome; named Validator; literal quality floor; project
commands. Prefer commands, otherwise use read-verified: <evidence> or
manual: <exact observation>. Unlabelled prose is invalid. A planned test may
name its future project runner; it cannot substitute a narrower runner later.
Validator stability. A validator must never gate on a surface other workflow actors mutate — the branch diff as a whole, the session log, progress entries, review ledgers, or forge state — because any out-of-unit commit (a session-log append, another unit's fold) then re-fails a frozen criterion on a finished unit and re-opens its review loop. Grep the unit's own files and outputs; a diff-based validator enumerates the unit's paths or excludes the workflow-mutated surfaces explicitly (docs/LOGS.md, the unit's own docs directory, harness/toolstate).
Freeze and receipt
At first execution run git hash-object <unit>/ACCEPTANCE.md and append to the
unit progress file:
## Acceptance receipt v1
- Manifest: <path> · Blob: <sha> · Status: frozen · Verified: <date>
Before every phase and final review, recompute it. Exact match continues; missing/mismatched evidence stops before edits:
ACCEPTANCE GATE — <unit> BLOCKED
Expected blob: <sha|missing> · Actual: <sha|missing>
Reason: the frozen finish line is missing or changed.
→ Next: restore the frozen manifest, or obtain explicit user approval for a
SPEC amendment and replacement manifest; then write a fresh receipt
· never edit tests, commands, or acceptance to make the current candidate pass
A legitimate change requires, in order: explicit user approval; dated SPEC
## Amendments row; replacement manifest; committed fresh receipt. The
executor never self-authorizes it.
Legacy unit with no manifest mention: fingerprint committed SPEC.md and record
Manifest: legacy SPEC.md. A new plan or any plan naming the manifest fails
closed when it is missing.
Validation ladder
Evaluate every row plus the normal project gate:
PASS: commands green; read evidence present; manual checks named.FAIL: validator disproves the candidate; include compact failure evidence.NEEDS-DECISION: missing product/architecture choice.BLOCKED: command/input/environment unavailable; name it.
Anti-gaming rules
Forbidden: deleting, skipping, narrowing, or loosening a validator; suppression, stub, hard-coded answer, or no-op fix used to manufacture green. A command cannot prove an untested read/manual row. Stronger regression tests are allowed. Repair test setup only when assertions stay at least as strong and the reason is logged.
Test immutability
A test, once written, is immutable. The executor fixes code until green, never the test — editing an expectation to match behaviour is not a fix, it is a cover-up. The sole legitimate amendment is a proven mis-encoding of external semantics: the test's expectation contradicts the actual documented semantics of the platform/library/language, cited from authoritative documentation — not a product decision change. Even that surfaces as a finding plus a SPEC amendment, never a silent edit to go green.
Prevention rides the research gate (research-before-encode): platform semantics are verified against authoritative documentation before a test encodes them, so adding stronger tests stays allowed; editing expectations never (except the proven-mis-encoding path above).
Done when
Frozen manifest + current blob receipt + named validators + literal quality floor; executor and reviewer evaluate identical bytes.
Files (agentic-workflow)
-
SKILL.md 4.3 KB
--- name: verification-contract user-invocable: false version: 1.2.1 author: "Gabriel Trabanco <gtrabanco@users.noreply.github.com>" license: MIT description: > Internal contract: one compact frozen ACCEPTANCE.md per delivery unit, its validation ladder, anti-weakening rules, and blob-bound execution receipt. Consumed by planners, execute-phase, and review-change. --- # Verification Contract (internal) Single owner of the delivery finish line. Planning freezes it; executors may strengthen coverage but cannot move it; review checks the same bytes. ## Artifact Every new feature/fix carries `ACCEPTANCE.md` beside its SPEC. Copy the matching repository template. Required parts: `Status: frozen`; one stable ID per SPEC criterion; `Required outcome`; named `Validator`; literal quality floor; project commands. Prefer commands, otherwise use `read-verified: <evidence>` or `manual: <exact observation>`. Unlabelled prose is invalid. A planned test may name its future project runner; it cannot substitute a narrower runner later. **Validator stability.** A validator must never gate on a surface other workflow actors mutate — the branch diff as a whole, the session log, progress entries, review ledgers, or forge state — because any out-of-unit commit (a session-log append, another unit's fold) then re-fails a frozen criterion on a finished unit and re-opens its review loop. Grep the unit's own files and outputs; a diff-based validator enumerates the unit's paths or excludes the workflow-mutated surfaces explicitly (docs/LOGS.md, the unit's own docs directory, harness/toolstate). ## Freeze and receipt At first execution run `git hash-object <unit>/ACCEPTANCE.md` and append to the unit progress file: ```text ## Acceptance receipt v1 - Manifest: <path> · Blob: <sha> · Status: frozen · Verified: <date> ``` Before every phase and final review, recompute it. Exact match continues; missing/mismatched evidence stops before edits: ```text ACCEPTANCE GATE — <unit> BLOCKED Expected blob: <sha|missing> · Actual: <sha|missing> Reason: the frozen finish line is missing or changed. → Next: restore the frozen manifest, or obtain explicit user approval for a SPEC amendment and replacement manifest; then write a fresh receipt · never edit tests, commands, or acceptance to make the current candidate pass ``` A legitimate change requires, in order: explicit user approval; dated SPEC `## Amendments` row; replacement manifest; committed fresh receipt. The executor never self-authorizes it. Legacy unit with no manifest mention: fingerprint committed `SPEC.md` and record `Manifest: legacy SPEC.md`. A new plan or any plan naming the manifest fails closed when it is missing. ## Validation ladder Evaluate every row plus the normal project gate: - `PASS`: commands green; read evidence present; manual checks named. - `FAIL`: validator disproves the candidate; include compact failure evidence. - `NEEDS-DECISION`: missing product/architecture choice. - `BLOCKED`: command/input/environment unavailable; name it. ## Anti-gaming rules Forbidden: deleting, skipping, narrowing, or loosening a validator; suppression, stub, hard-coded answer, or no-op fix used to manufacture green. A command cannot prove an untested read/manual row. Stronger regression tests are allowed. Repair test setup only when assertions stay at least as strong and the reason is logged. ## Test immutability A test, once written, is **immutable**. The executor fixes code until green, never the test — editing an expectation to match behaviour is not a fix, it is a cover-up. The sole legitimate amendment is a **proven mis-encoding of external semantics**: the test's expectation contradicts the actual documented semantics of the platform/library/language, cited from authoritative documentation — not a product decision change. Even that surfaces as a **finding plus a SPEC amendment**, never a silent edit to go green. Prevention rides the research gate (**research-before-encode**): platform semantics are verified against authoritative documentation **before a test encodes them**, so **adding stronger tests stays allowed**; **editing expectations never** (except the proven-mis-encoding path above). ## Done when Frozen manifest + current blob receipt + named validators + literal quality floor; executor and reviewer evaluate identical bytes.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.