Claude Skill

triage-nda

Ten-minute NDA triage — classifies an incoming NDA as GREEN (sign under standard delegation), YELLOW (targeted fixes, listed), or RED (full review). Screens mutuality, term and survival, definition breadth, embedded non-solicits or non-competes, missing standard carve-outs, resid

LLM Mart · 0 points · 9 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download alebgl77-claude-inc-skills_triage-nda-eb8654b.zip · 2 KB
Part of alebgl77/claude-inc — 50 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc/tree/main/skills/triage-nda
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install alebgl77-claude-inc@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole alebgl77/claude-inc collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Triage NDA — NDA Triage

"Fast NDA review"

Built for speed: seven screens, one verdict, ten minutes. Works on pasted NDA text or a file.

When to use

  • "Can I just sign this NDA?" — the speed call
  • "Sales needs this countersigned today" — deal-velocity triage
  • "Is this NDA actually mutual?" — direction check
  • Screening a batch of inbound NDAs before a partner event
  • Confidentiality terms embedded in a larger agreement belong to review-contract, not here

Workflow

  1. Ingest the NDA (pasted text or file). Confirm it is a standalone NDA; note parties, stated purpose, and our disclosure direction (mostly disclosing, mostly receiving, or both).
  2. Screen mutuality: obligations must run both ways if information does. One-way obligations against us while we disclose is RED territory.
  3. Check term and survival: an agreement term of 1-3 years and confidentiality survival of 2-5 years are standard; indefinite survival passes only for trade secrets.
  4. Check definition breadth: "Confidential Information" should be bounded — marked, or reasonably understood as confidential. Definitions sweeping in all business contacts or "any information disclosed by any means at any time" get flagged.
  5. Hunt embedded landmines: non-solicit, non-compete, exclusivity, or standstill clauses do not belong in an NDA — any one of them forces RED.
  6. Verify the four standard carve-outs: public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, compelled disclosure (with notice where lawful). Each missing carve-out is a YELLOW fix with insert language.
  7. Screen residuals and IP: a residuals clause broad enough to gut confidentiality is RED; any assignment of IP, feedback, or derivatives smuggled into an NDA is RED.
  8. Classify and deliver: GREEN — sign under standard delegation; YELLOW — apply the listed fixes, then sign; RED — route to full review with reasons quoted.

Output format

NDA TRIAGE — <counterparty> — <date>
Direction: <mutual / we disclose / we receive>   Purpose: <one line>

VERDICT: <GREEN — sign under standard delegation | YELLOW — fix, then sign | RED — full review>

SCREENS
| Check                              | Result | Note              |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| Mutuality                          | PASS   |                   |
| Term & survival                    | FLAG   | <what and why>    |
| Definition breadth                 | PASS   |                   |
| Embedded non-solicit / non-compete | PASS   |                   |
| Standard carve-outs (4)            | FLAG   | missing: <which>  |
| Residuals clause                   | PASS   | none present      |
| IP assignment smuggling            | PASS   | none present      |

FIXES (YELLOW verdicts)
1. <clause> — Quote: "<verbatim>" → Insert: "<replacement language>"
2. <clause> — Quote: "<verbatim>" → Insert: "<replacement language>"

RED REASONS (RED verdicts)
- <finding> — Quote: "<verbatim>" — why it forces full review

*Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*

Quality bar

  • Verdict is exactly one of GREEN / YELLOW / RED — no hedging
  • All seven screens run and shown, passes included
  • Every FLAG quotes the offending text verbatim
  • Every YELLOW fix ships insert language — a YELLOW without fixes is a RED
  • Embedded non-solicit, non-compete, exclusivity, or standstill always forces RED
  • Triage completes on the NDA text alone, no outside context required

Example

Invocation: "BD forwarded this mutual NDA from Acme — okay to sign?" (NDA pasted)

Produces: Verdict YELLOW. Carve-outs missing independent development (insert provided); survival is seven years ("the obligations herein shall survive for seven (7) years") redlined to three; the other five screens pass. Two paste-ready fixes — sign under standard delegation once applied.

Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.

Files (claude-inc)
  • SKILL.md 4.4 KB
    ---
    name: triage-nda
    description: "Ten-minute NDA triage — classifies an incoming NDA as GREEN (sign under standard delegation), YELLOW (targeted fixes, listed), or RED (full review). Screens mutuality, term and survival, definition breadth, embedded non-solicits or non-competes, missing standard carve-outs, residuals clauses, and IP assignment smuggling. Use when the user says 'can I sign this NDA', 'quick look at this NDA', or forwards any confidentiality agreement."
    ---
    
    # Triage NDA — NDA Triage
    
    > "Fast NDA review"
    
    Built for speed: seven screens, one verdict, ten minutes. Works on pasted NDA text or a file.
    
    ## When to use
    
    - "Can I just sign this NDA?" — the speed call
    - "Sales needs this countersigned today" — deal-velocity triage
    - "Is this NDA actually mutual?" — direction check
    - Screening a batch of inbound NDAs before a partner event
    - Confidentiality terms embedded in a larger agreement belong to `review-contract`, not here
    
    ## Workflow
    
    1. Ingest the NDA (pasted text or file). Confirm it is a standalone NDA; note parties, stated purpose, and our disclosure direction (mostly disclosing, mostly receiving, or both).
    2. Screen mutuality: obligations must run both ways if information does. One-way obligations against us while we disclose is RED territory.
    3. Check term and survival: an agreement term of 1-3 years and confidentiality survival of 2-5 years are standard; indefinite survival passes only for trade secrets.
    4. Check definition breadth: "Confidential Information" should be bounded — marked, or reasonably understood as confidential. Definitions sweeping in all business contacts or "any information disclosed by any means at any time" get flagged.
    5. Hunt embedded landmines: non-solicit, non-compete, exclusivity, or standstill clauses do not belong in an NDA — any one of them forces RED.
    6. Verify the four standard carve-outs: public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, compelled disclosure (with notice where lawful). Each missing carve-out is a YELLOW fix with insert language.
    7. Screen residuals and IP: a residuals clause broad enough to gut confidentiality is RED; any assignment of IP, feedback, or derivatives smuggled into an NDA is RED.
    8. Classify and deliver: GREEN — sign under standard delegation; YELLOW — apply the listed fixes, then sign; RED — route to full review with reasons quoted.
    
    ## Output format
    
    ```
    NDA TRIAGE — <counterparty> — <date>
    Direction: <mutual / we disclose / we receive>   Purpose: <one line>
    
    VERDICT: <GREEN — sign under standard delegation | YELLOW — fix, then sign | RED — full review>
    
    SCREENS
    | Check                              | Result | Note              |
    |------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
    | Mutuality                          | PASS   |                   |
    | Term & survival                    | FLAG   | <what and why>    |
    | Definition breadth                 | PASS   |                   |
    | Embedded non-solicit / non-compete | PASS   |                   |
    | Standard carve-outs (4)            | FLAG   | missing: <which>  |
    | Residuals clause                   | PASS   | none present      |
    | IP assignment smuggling            | PASS   | none present      |
    
    FIXES (YELLOW verdicts)
    1. <clause> — Quote: "<verbatim>" → Insert: "<replacement language>"
    2. <clause> — Quote: "<verbatim>" → Insert: "<replacement language>"
    
    RED REASONS (RED verdicts)
    - <finding> — Quote: "<verbatim>" — why it forces full review
    
    *Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*
    ```
    
    ## Quality bar
    
    - [ ] Verdict is exactly one of GREEN / YELLOW / RED — no hedging
    - [ ] All seven screens run and shown, passes included
    - [ ] Every FLAG quotes the offending text verbatim
    - [ ] Every YELLOW fix ships insert language — a YELLOW without fixes is a RED
    - [ ] Embedded non-solicit, non-compete, exclusivity, or standstill always forces RED
    - [ ] Triage completes on the NDA text alone, no outside context required
    
    ## Example
    
    **Invocation:** "BD forwarded this mutual NDA from Acme — okay to sign?" (NDA pasted)
    
    **Produces:** Verdict YELLOW. Carve-outs missing independent development (insert provided); survival is seven years ("the obligations herein shall survive for seven (7) years") redlined to three; the other five screens pass. Two paste-ready fixes — sign under standard delegation once applied.
    
    *Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related