suede-free-tools
Suede-affiliated engineering-as-marketing strategy for selecting, scoring, and scoping calculators, graders, generators, and other free interactive tools. Use when the user wants a lead, link, education, or product-adoption asset with a measurable path to the paid product. NOT FO
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/tree/main/skills/suede-free-tools
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install jasoncolapietro-suede-creator-skills@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole jasoncolapietro/suede-creator-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Suede Free-Tool Growth Strategy
Suede uses engineering as marketing when a genuinely useful tool can create qualified discovery and a natural bridge to the paid product. Select, score, and scope the smallest maintainable calculator, grader, generator, or utility whose output earns attention rather than merely capturing it.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before designing a tool strategy, understand:
Business Context - What's the core product? Who is the target audience? What problems do they have?
Goals - Lead generation? SEO/traffic? Brand awareness? Product education? What is one lead worth (LTV and close rate from this source)?
Resources - Technical capacity to build? Ongoing maintenance bandwidth? Budget for promotion? Timeline?
Existing Behavior - What tools or manual workarounds does the audience use today? How are leads generated now?
Core Principles
1. Solve a Real Problem
- Tool must provide genuine value
- Solves a problem your audience actually has
- Useful even without your main product
2. Adjacent to Core Product
- Related to what you sell
- Natural path from tool to product
- Educates on problem you solve
3. Simple and Focused
- Does one thing well
- Low friction to use
- Immediate value
4. Worth the Investment
- Lead value × expected leads > build cost + maintenance
Populate all four terms before calling the go/no-go, and show the arithmetic:
- Lead value = customer LTV × close rate for this lead source, from the intake numbers.
- Expected leads = monthly search volume for the SEO target keyword × a stated visit-to-use rate × a stated use-to-capture rate.
- Build cost = the MVP scope below, in engineer-days.
- Maintenance = engineer-days per quarter to keep data, dependencies, and the hosting current.
State every rate you assumed and where it came from. If a term cannot be sourced, say which one and mark the go/no-go unresolved rather than filling it in.
Tool Types Overview
| Type | Examples | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Calculators | ROI, savings, pricing estimators | Decisions involving numbers |
| Generators | Templates, policies, names | Creating something quickly |
| Analyzers | Website graders, SEO auditors | Evaluating existing work |
| Testers | Meta tag preview, speed tests | Checking if something works |
| Libraries | Icon sets, templates, snippets | Reference material |
| Interactive | Tutorials, playgrounds, quizzes | Learning/understanding |
For detailed tool types and examples: See references/tool-types.md
Ideation Framework
Start with Pain Points
What problems does your audience Google? - Search query research, common questions
What manual processes are tedious? - Spreadsheet tasks, repetitive calculations
What do they need before buying your product? - Assessments, planning, comparisons
What information do they wish they had? - Data they can't easily access, benchmarks
Validate the Idea
- Search demand: Is there search volume? How competitive?
- Uniqueness: What exists? How can you be 10x better?
- Lead quality: Does this audience match buyers?
- Build feasibility: How complex? Can you scope an MVP?
Lead Capture Strategy
Gating Options
| Approach | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Fully gated | Maximum capture | Lower usage |
| Partially gated | Balance of both | Common pattern |
| Ungated + optional | Maximum reach | Lower capture |
| Ungated entirely | Pure SEO/brand | No direct leads |
Lead Capture Best Practices
- Value exchange clear: "Get your full report"
- Minimal friction: Email only
- Show preview of what they'll get
- Optional: Segment by asking one qualifying question
The gating trade-off itself — per-field conversion cost and how to frame the
exchange — is owned by suede-lead-magnets. Use its gating tables when deciding
what to ask for; the table above only covers where the gate sits in a tool.
SEO Considerations
Keyword Strategy
Tool landing page: "[thing] calculator", "[thing] generator", "free [tool type]"
Supporting content: "How to [use case]", "What is [concept]"
Link Building
Free tools attract links because:
- Genuinely useful (people reference them)
- Unique (can't link to just any page)
- Shareable (social amplification)
Build vs. Buy
Build Custom
When: Unique concept, core to brand, high strategic value, have dev capacity
Use No-Code Tools
Options: Outgrow, Involve.me, Typeform, Tally, Bubble, Webflow When: Speed to market, limited dev resources, testing concept
Embed Existing
When: Something good exists, white-label available, not core differentiator
MVP Scope
Minimum Viable Tool
- Core functionality only—does the one thing, works reliably
- Essential UX—clear input, obvious output, mobile works
- Basic lead capture—email collection, leads go somewhere useful
What to Skip Initially
Account creation, saving results, advanced features, perfect design, every edge case
Evaluation Scorecard
Rate each factor 1-5:
| Factor | Score |
|---|---|
| Search demand exists | ___ |
| Audience match to buyers | ___ |
| Uniqueness vs. existing | ___ |
| Natural path to product | ___ |
| Build feasibility | ___ |
| Maintenance burden (inverse) | ___ |
| Link-building potential | ___ |
| Share-worthiness | ___ |
25+: Strong candidate | 15-24: Promising | <15: Reconsider
Anchors for the three decisive factors — score these against the anchor, not on impression, and cite the evidence used:
| Factor | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search demand exists | No query with measurable volume | A query family in the hundreds of searches/month | A head term in the thousands/month |
| Build feasibility | Needs a data pipeline, licensed data, or an ongoing integration | Two to four engineer-weeks with known components | One engineer-week, one screen, no backend state |
| Maintenance burden (inverse) | Depends on data refreshed on a schedule or a third-party API | Occasional content or dependency updates | Static computation, nothing to refresh |
Output Format
Return exactly these sections:
1. Recommended Tool
Name and the one-sentence job it does for the user.
2. Scorecard
The filled table with a score per factor, the total, and the verdict band. For the three anchored factors, name the evidence behind the score.
3. MVP Scope
Two explicit lists: In (what v1 does) and Out (what is deliberately deferred). No item appears in both.
4. Gating Decision
Which option from Gating Options, and the trade-off accepted in one line.
5. SEO Target
The single target query for the tool page, plus the supporting-content query.
6. Instrumentation Handoff
The two or three usage events the tool must emit (use, complete, capture) so
suede-analytics can read the funnel. This skill does not define the metrics
plan itself.
Boundaries
- Do not claim search demand, lead volume, link potential, or build feasibility without evidence and dated assumptions.
- Do not build, deploy, publish, collect leads, or connect production data unless the user authorizes implementation.
- Do not invent tool outputs or use a calculator as disguised professional, legal, medical, or financial advice.
- Do not decide pricing, data-retention, or consent policy for the user.
Routing
- Use
suede-lead-magnetsfor downloadable assets andsuede-site-alchemyfor the public conversion surface. - Use
suede-seo-auditfor search validation andsuede-analyticsfor usage measurement. - Use
suede-emailsfor the post-capture lifecycle sequence. - Use
suede-content-strategyfor the supporting content around the tool page. - Use
suede-adsandsuede-socialfor tool distribution and launch promotion. - Use
suede-ab-testingto design and evaluate tests on the tool page or its gate.
Files (suede-creator-skills)
-
agents
-
openai.yaml 606 B
interface: display_name: "Suede Free Tools" short_description: "Engineering as marketing: build a free tool that pulls" default_prompt: "Use $suede-free-tools on [target]. The user is weighing or building a free calculator, grader, generator, or other interactive tool for lead generation or links. Work through pick a free tool worth building, scope it honestly, and design it so the output pulls people toward the paid product, ground every recommendation in evidence the user can check, and return the decisions, the reasoning, and what to measure next." policy: allow_implicit_invocation: true
-
-
evals
-
evals.json 6.1 KB
{ "skill_name": "suede-free-tools", "evals": [ { "id": 1, "prompt": "We want to build a free tool to drive leads for our SEO software. We're thinking about an SEO audit tool or a keyword research tool. Which would be better and how should we approach it?", "expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should apply the evaluation scorecard to compare both tool ideas across dimensions (audience alignment, lead quality, build effort, SEO value, maintenance burden, competitive differentiation). Should reference the tool types from the skill (analyzers, testers). Should recommend the stronger option with rationale. Should discuss lead capture gating strategy (what's free vs what requires email). Should address MVP scope — what's the minimum valuable version. Should provide implementation recommendations.", "assertions": [ "Checks for product-marketing.md", "Applies evaluation scorecard to compare options", "References tool types from the skill", "Recommends one option with clear rationale", "Discusses lead capture gating strategy", "Addresses MVP scope", "Provides implementation recommendations" ], "files": [] }, { "id": 2, "prompt": "I want to build a free ROI calculator for our HR software. Users input their company size and current processes, and it shows how much time and money they'd save.", "expected_output": "Should identify this as a calculator tool type. Should apply the ideation framework to validate the concept. Should discuss lead capture strategy: should the basic result be free and detailed report gated? Should address the build vs buy decision. Should recommend MVP scope (what inputs, what outputs, what formula). Should discuss SEO considerations for the tool page. Should reference the evaluation scorecard to score the idea.", "assertions": [ "Identifies as calculator tool type", "Applies ideation framework to validate", "Discusses lead capture gating strategy", "Addresses build vs buy decision", "Recommends MVP scope (inputs, outputs, formula)", "Discusses SEO considerations", "References evaluation scorecard" ], "files": [] }, { "id": 3, "prompt": "give me some ideas for free tools we could build. we sell email marketing software for e-commerce brands.", "expected_output": "Should trigger on casual phrasing. Should apply the ideation framework to generate tool ideas relevant to email marketing + e-commerce. Should provide 5-8 ideas across different tool types (calculators, generators, analyzers, testers). Examples: email subject line tester, email deliverability checker, email ROI calculator, email template generator, spam score checker. Should briefly score each against the evaluation dimensions. Should recommend top 2-3 to pursue.", "assertions": [ "Triggers on casual phrasing", "Applies ideation framework", "Generates ideas across multiple tool types", "Ideas are relevant to email marketing + e-commerce", "Provides 5-8 ideas", "Briefly evaluates each idea", "Recommends top 2-3 to pursue" ], "files": [] }, { "id": 4, "prompt": "We built a free website speed test tool 6 months ago but it's barely getting any traffic. What went wrong and how do we fix it?", "expected_output": "Should diagnose why the tool isn't getting traffic. Should investigate: SEO strategy for the tool page (target keywords, on-page optimization), distribution strategy (was it launched and forgotten?), competitive landscape (are there dominant free tools already?), tool quality and UX (does it provide unique value?). Should apply the engineering as marketing principles. Should recommend a recovery plan: SEO improvements, content marketing around the tool, product improvements for differentiation.", "assertions": [ "Diagnoses potential traffic issues", "Investigates SEO strategy for the tool", "Assesses competitive landscape", "Questions unique value proposition", "Applies engineering as marketing principles", "Recommends recovery plan with specific actions" ], "files": [] }, { "id": 5, "prompt": "Should we gate our free tool behind an email capture or make it completely free? We want leads but don't want to kill usage.", "expected_output": "Should apply the lead capture gating strategy framework. Should present the spectrum: fully ungated → partial gating (basic results free, detailed report gated) → fully gated. Should recommend partial gating as the typical best approach — give enough value to demonstrate the tool's worth, gate the detailed/actionable output. Should discuss tradeoffs: ungated = more SEO value and usage, gated = more leads but fewer users. Should provide specific gating recommendations based on tool type.", "assertions": [ "Applies lead capture gating strategy", "Presents gating spectrum (ungated to fully gated)", "Recommends partial gating approach", "Discusses tradeoffs of each approach", "Provides specific gating recommendations", "Addresses SEO impact of gating decisions" ], "files": [] }, { "id": 6, "prompt": "How do I optimize the landing page for our free tool to get more signups? The tool itself is great but nobody finds it.", "expected_output": "Should recognize this is a landing page conversion optimization task, not a free tool strategy task. Should defer to or cross-reference suede-site-alchemy for optimizing the tool's landing-page conversion rate. May provide free-tool-specific context (gating strategy, value demonstration) but should make clear that suede-site-alchemy owns page conversion optimization.", "assertions": [ "Recognizes this as page CRO, not free tool strategy", "References or defers to suede-site-alchemy", "May provide free-tool-specific context", "Does not attempt full page CRO using free tool strategy patterns" ], "files": [] } ] }
-
-
references
-
tool-types.md 3.9 KB
# Free Tool Types Reference Detailed guide to each type of marketing tool you can build. ## Contents - Calculators - Generators - Analyzers/Auditors - Testers/Validators - Libraries/Resources - Interactive Educational - Tool Concept Examples by Industry (SaaS product, agency/services, e-commerce, developer tools, finance) ## Calculators **Best for**: Decisions involving numbers, comparisons, estimates **Examples**: - ROI calculator - Savings calculator - Cost comparison tool - Salary calculator - Tax estimator - Pricing estimator - Compound interest calculator - Break-even calculator **Why they work**: - Personalized output - High perceived value - Share-worthy results - Clear problem → solution **Implementation tips**: - Keep inputs simple - Show calculations transparently - Make results shareable - Add "powered by" branding --- ## Generators **Best for**: Creating something useful quickly **Examples**: - Policy generator (privacy, terms) - Template generator - Name/tagline generator - Email subject line generator - Resume builder - Color palette generator - Logo maker - Contract generator **Why they work**: - Tangible output - Saves time - Easily shared - Repeat usage **Implementation tips**: - Output should be immediately usable - Allow customization - Offer download/export options - Include email gating for premium outputs --- ## Analyzers/Auditors **Best for**: Evaluating existing work or assets **Examples**: - Website grader - SEO analyzer - Email subject tester - Headline analyzer - Security checker - Performance auditor - Accessibility checker - Code quality analyzer **Why they work**: - Curiosity-driven - Personalized insights - Creates awareness of problems - Natural lead to solution **Implementation tips**: - Score or grade for gamification - Benchmark against averages - Provide actionable recommendations - Follow up with improvement offers --- ## Testers/Validators **Best for**: Checking if something works **Examples**: - Meta tag preview - Email rendering test - Mobile-friendly test - Speed test - DNS checker - SSL certificate checker - Redirect checker - Broken link finder **Why they work**: - Immediate utility - Bookmark-worthy - Repeat usage - Professional necessity **Implementation tips**: - Fast results are essential - Show pass/fail clearly - Provide fix instructions - Integrate with your product where relevant --- ## Libraries/Resources **Best for**: Reference material **Examples**: - Icon library - Template library - Code snippet library - Example gallery - Industry directory - Resource list - Swipe file collection - Font pairing tool **Why they work**: - High SEO value - Ongoing traffic - Establishes authority - Linkable asset **Implementation tips**: - Make searchable/filterable - Allow easy copying/downloading - Update regularly - Accept community submissions --- ## Interactive Educational **Best for**: Learning/understanding **Examples**: - Interactive tutorials - Code playgrounds - Visual explainers - Quizzes/assessments - Simulators - Comparison tools - Decision trees - Configurators **Why they work**: - Engages deeply - Demonstrates expertise - Shareable - Memory-creating **Implementation tips**: - Make it hands-on - Show immediate feedback - Lead to deeper resources - Capture engaged users --- ## Tool Concept Examples by Industry ### SaaS Product - Product ROI calculator - Competitor comparison tool - Readiness assessment quiz - Template library for use case - Feature configurator ### Agency/Services - Industry benchmark tool - Project scoping calculator - Portfolio review tool - Cost estimator - Proposal generator ### E-commerce - Product finder quiz - Comparison tool - Size/fit calculator - Savings calculator - Gift finder ### Developer Tools - Code snippet library - Testing/preview tool - Documentation generator - Interactive tutorials - API playground ### Finance - Financial calculators - Investment comparison - Budget planner - Tax estimator - Loan calculator
-
-
CARD.md 4.3 KB
# Skill Card — Suede Free-Tool Growth Strategy <!-- Generated by scripts/build-skill-cards.mjs — do not hand-edit. --> <!-- Regenerate with: npm run build:cards --> Release record for the `suede-free-tools` skill, following the NVIDIA skill-card template (<https://docs.nvidia.com/skills/skill-cards>). It tells a reviewer what the skill does, who owns it, what it needs, what could go wrong, and what evidence backs the release — without requiring them to open the source first. ## Description Suede-affiliated engineering-as-marketing strategy for selecting, scoring, and scoping calculators, graders, generators, and other free interactive tools. Status: production. Ships in the `suede-skills` plugin (the full pack) at release 0.19.0; loads as a Claude Code / Codex agent skill from this directory's [SKILL.md](./SKILL.md). ## Owner Jason Colapietro, Suede Labs AI (<https://github.com/JasonColapietro>). Security contact: `info@suedeai.ai` per [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md). ## License / Terms of Use MIT ([LICENSE](../../LICENSE)). The pack's combined license expression is `MIT AND BSD-3-Clause`; this skill bundles no third-party licensed material of its own. ## Use Case Target users: developers and creators running the skill inside a Claude Code or Codex CLI session. Use when the user wants a lead, link, education, or product-adoption asset with a measurable path to the paid product. Out of scope — downloadable lead assets (use suede-lead-magnets), implementation of a full website (use suede-site-alchemy), or search diagnostics (use suede-seo-audit). ## Deployment Geography Global. The skill is a prompt-and-script package that runs locally inside the invoking agent session; it pins no region-specific service of its own. ## Requirements / Dependencies - A Claude Code or Codex CLI session with the `suede-skills` plugin installed (install options: <https://skills.suedeai.ai/>). - Bundled files loaded relative to this directory: `agents/` (1 file), `references/` (1 file). - Credentials: none are bundled or required by the skill files. Any tool or API credentials come from the host session; never paste credentials into skill files, prompts, or outputs. ## Known Risks and Mitigations - Risk: an agent treats a quality gate as autonomous authority. Mitigation: every gate in the pack is advisory — it changes what is reported, never what the user decided; only extreme-risk findings (data loss, credential exposure, legal/rights violations, payment mistakes, irreversible public damage) pause for the user's explicit choice. - Risk: a skill instruction is used to act outside its mandate. Mitigation: the hard limits in the skill body's "Boundaries" section, quoted below. From "Boundaries": - Do not claim search demand, lead volume, link potential, or build feasibility without evidence and dated assumptions. - Do not build, deploy, publish, collect leads, or connect production data unless the user authorizes implementation. - Do not invent tool outputs or use a calculator as disguised professional, legal, medical, or financial advice. - Do not decide pricing, data-retention, or consent policy for the user. ## References - Skill source: [`skills/suede-free-tools/SKILL.md`](./SKILL.md) - Rendered reference page: <https://skills.suedeai.ai/skills/suede-free-tools.html> - Security policy and reviewed scanner exceptions: [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md) and [`.plugin-scanner.toml`](../../.plugin-scanner.toml) at the repo root ## Skill Output Structured Markdown returned in the agent's response, shaped by the output contract defined in the skill body: "Output Format". The skill publishes, posts, and sends nothing without the user's explicit authorization; delivery decisions stay with the user. ## Skill Version 0.19.0 — the pack is single-versioned, so every skill releases together; see [VERSION](../../VERSION) and [CITATION.cff](../../CITATION.cff) for the release identifier this card describes. ## Ethical Considerations - The skill produces recommendations for a human decision-maker. Publishing, sending, payment, and rights decisions stay with the user. - Its gates require verifiable claims and honest reporting; do not use the skill to fabricate claims, evidence, metrics, or attribution. - Report suspected misuse or a security concern privately per [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md); do not open a public issue for it. -
SKILL.md 8.7 KB
--- name: suede-free-tools description: "Suede-affiliated engineering-as-marketing strategy for selecting, scoring, and scoping calculators, graders, generators, and other free interactive tools. Use when the user wants a lead, link, education, or product-adoption asset with a measurable path to the paid product. NOT FOR: downloadable lead assets (use suede-lead-magnets), implementation of a full website (use suede-site-alchemy), or search diagnostics (use suede-seo-audit)." metadata: version: 2.0.0 --- # Suede Free-Tool Growth Strategy Suede uses engineering as marketing when a genuinely useful tool can create qualified discovery and a natural bridge to the paid product. Select, score, and scope the smallest maintainable calculator, grader, generator, or utility whose output earns attention rather than merely capturing it. ## Initial Assessment **Check for product marketing context first:** If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task. Before designing a tool strategy, understand: 1. **Business Context** - What's the core product? Who is the target audience? What problems do they have? 2. **Goals** - Lead generation? SEO/traffic? Brand awareness? Product education? What is one lead worth (LTV and close rate from this source)? 3. **Resources** - Technical capacity to build? Ongoing maintenance bandwidth? Budget for promotion? Timeline? 4. **Existing Behavior** - What tools or manual workarounds does the audience use today? How are leads generated now? --- ## Core Principles ### 1. Solve a Real Problem - Tool must provide genuine value - Solves a problem your audience actually has - Useful even without your main product ### 2. Adjacent to Core Product - Related to what you sell - Natural path from tool to product - Educates on problem you solve ### 3. Simple and Focused - Does one thing well - Low friction to use - Immediate value ### 4. Worth the Investment - Lead value × expected leads > build cost + maintenance Populate all four terms before calling the go/no-go, and show the arithmetic: - **Lead value** = customer LTV × close rate for this lead source, from the intake numbers. - **Expected leads** = monthly search volume for the SEO target keyword × a stated visit-to-use rate × a stated use-to-capture rate. - **Build cost** = the MVP scope below, in engineer-days. - **Maintenance** = engineer-days per quarter to keep data, dependencies, and the hosting current. State every rate you assumed and where it came from. If a term cannot be sourced, say which one and mark the go/no-go unresolved rather than filling it in. --- ## Tool Types Overview | Type | Examples | Best For | |------|----------|----------| | Calculators | ROI, savings, pricing estimators | Decisions involving numbers | | Generators | Templates, policies, names | Creating something quickly | | Analyzers | Website graders, SEO auditors | Evaluating existing work | | Testers | Meta tag preview, speed tests | Checking if something works | | Libraries | Icon sets, templates, snippets | Reference material | | Interactive | Tutorials, playgrounds, quizzes | Learning/understanding | **For detailed tool types and examples**: See [references/tool-types.md](references/tool-types.md) --- ## Ideation Framework ### Start with Pain Points 1. **What problems does your audience Google?** - Search query research, common questions 2. **What manual processes are tedious?** - Spreadsheet tasks, repetitive calculations 3. **What do they need before buying your product?** - Assessments, planning, comparisons 4. **What information do they wish they had?** - Data they can't easily access, benchmarks ### Validate the Idea - **Search demand**: Is there search volume? How competitive? - **Uniqueness**: What exists? How can you be 10x better? - **Lead quality**: Does this audience match buyers? - **Build feasibility**: How complex? Can you scope an MVP? --- ## Lead Capture Strategy ### Gating Options | Approach | Pros | Cons | |----------|------|------| | Fully gated | Maximum capture | Lower usage | | Partially gated | Balance of both | Common pattern | | Ungated + optional | Maximum reach | Lower capture | | Ungated entirely | Pure SEO/brand | No direct leads | ### Lead Capture Best Practices - Value exchange clear: "Get your full report" - Minimal friction: Email only - Show preview of what they'll get - Optional: Segment by asking one qualifying question The gating trade-off itself — per-field conversion cost and how to frame the exchange — is owned by `suede-lead-magnets`. Use its gating tables when deciding what to ask for; the table above only covers where the gate sits in a tool. --- ## SEO Considerations ### Keyword Strategy **Tool landing page**: "[thing] calculator", "[thing] generator", "free [tool type]" **Supporting content**: "How to [use case]", "What is [concept]" ### Link Building Free tools attract links because: - Genuinely useful (people reference them) - Unique (can't link to just any page) - Shareable (social amplification) --- ## Build vs. Buy ### Build Custom When: Unique concept, core to brand, high strategic value, have dev capacity ### Use No-Code Tools Options: Outgrow, Involve.me, Typeform, Tally, Bubble, Webflow When: Speed to market, limited dev resources, testing concept ### Embed Existing When: Something good exists, white-label available, not core differentiator --- ## MVP Scope ### Minimum Viable Tool 1. Core functionality only—does the one thing, works reliably 2. Essential UX—clear input, obvious output, mobile works 3. Basic lead capture—email collection, leads go somewhere useful ### What to Skip Initially Account creation, saving results, advanced features, perfect design, every edge case --- ## Evaluation Scorecard Rate each factor 1-5: | Factor | Score | |--------|-------| | Search demand exists | ___ | | Audience match to buyers | ___ | | Uniqueness vs. existing | ___ | | Natural path to product | ___ | | Build feasibility | ___ | | Maintenance burden (inverse) | ___ | | Link-building potential | ___ | | Share-worthiness | ___ | **25+**: Strong candidate | **15-24**: Promising | **<15**: Reconsider Anchors for the three decisive factors — score these against the anchor, not on impression, and cite the evidence used: | Factor | 1 | 3 | 5 | |--------|---|---|---| | Search demand exists | No query with measurable volume | A query family in the hundreds of searches/month | A head term in the thousands/month | | Build feasibility | Needs a data pipeline, licensed data, or an ongoing integration | Two to four engineer-weeks with known components | One engineer-week, one screen, no backend state | | Maintenance burden (inverse) | Depends on data refreshed on a schedule or a third-party API | Occasional content or dependency updates | Static computation, nothing to refresh | --- ## Output Format Return exactly these sections: ### 1. Recommended Tool Name and the one-sentence job it does for the user. ### 2. Scorecard The filled table with a score per factor, the total, and the verdict band. For the three anchored factors, name the evidence behind the score. ### 3. MVP Scope Two explicit lists: **In** (what v1 does) and **Out** (what is deliberately deferred). No item appears in both. ### 4. Gating Decision Which option from Gating Options, and the trade-off accepted in one line. ### 5. SEO Target The single target query for the tool page, plus the supporting-content query. ### 6. Instrumentation Handoff The two or three usage events the tool must emit (use, complete, capture) so `suede-analytics` can read the funnel. This skill does not define the metrics plan itself. --- ## Boundaries - Do not claim search demand, lead volume, link potential, or build feasibility without evidence and dated assumptions. - Do not build, deploy, publish, collect leads, or connect production data unless the user authorizes implementation. - Do not invent tool outputs or use a calculator as disguised professional, legal, medical, or financial advice. - Do not decide pricing, data-retention, or consent policy for the user. ## Routing - Use `suede-lead-magnets` for downloadable assets and `suede-site-alchemy` for the public conversion surface. - Use `suede-seo-audit` for search validation and `suede-analytics` for usage measurement. - Use `suede-emails` for the post-capture lifecycle sequence. - Use `suede-content-strategy` for the supporting content around the tool page. - Use `suede-ads` and `suede-social` for tool distribution and launch promotion. - Use `suede-ab-testing` to design and evaluate tests on the tool page or its gate.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.