Claude Skill

suede-community-marketing

Suede-owned community-growth discipline for member purpose, platform choice, seeding, rituals, moderation, health metrics, and earned advocacy. Use when starting, auditing, or growing a Discord, Slack, forum, subreddit, or comparable product community. NOT FOR: public social-chan

LLM Mart · 0 points · 17 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download JasonColapietro-suede-creator-skills-skills_suede-community-marketing-f192517.zip · 10 KB
Part of jasoncolapietro/suede-creator-skills — 70 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills/tree/main/skills/suede-community-marketing
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install jasoncolapietro-suede-creator-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole jasoncolapietro/suede-creator-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Suede Community Marketing

Use this Suede community-growth playbook to create genuine member value and measurable business outcomes without manufacturing engagement.

Before You Start

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.

Understand the situation (ask if not provided):

  1. What is the product or brand? — What problem does it solve, who uses it
  2. What community platform(s) are in play? — Discord, Slack, Circle, Reddit, Facebook Groups, forum, etc.
  3. What stage is the community at? — Pre-launch, 0–100 members, 100–1k, scaling, or established
  4. What is the primary community goal? — Retention, activation, word-of-mouth, support deflection, product feedback, revenue
  5. Who is the ideal community member? — Role, motivation, what they hope to get from joining

Work with whatever context is available. If key details are missing, make reasonable assumptions and flag them.


Community Strategy Principles

Build around a shared identity, not just a product

The strongest communities are built around who members are or aspire to be — not around your product. Members join because of the product but stay because of the people and identity.

Example: r/homelab — the identity is tinkerers who self-host, and every ritual, channel, and recognition mechanic in it reinforces that self-image.

Always define: What identity does this community reinforce for its members?

Value must flow to members first

Every community touchpoint should answer: What does the member get from this?

  • Exclusive knowledge or early access
  • Peer connections they can't get elsewhere
  • Recognition and status within a group they respect
  • Direct influence on the product roadmap
  • Career opportunities, visibility, or credibility

Playbooks by Goal

Launching a Community from Zero

  1. Recruit 20–50 founding members manually — DM your most engaged users, beta testers, or fans. Don't open publicly until there is baseline activity.
  2. Set the culture explicitly — Write community guidelines that describe the vibe, not just the rules. What does great participation look like here?
  3. Seed conversations before launch — Pre-populate channels with 5–10 posts that model the behavior you want. Questions, wins, resources.
  4. Do things that don't scale at first — Reply to every post. Welcome every new member by name. Host a weekly call. You are buying social proof.
  5. Define your core loop — What action do you want members to take weekly? Make it easy and reward it publicly.

Growing an Existing Community

  1. Audit where members drop off — Are people joining but not posting? Posting once and disappearing? Identify the leaky stage.
  2. Create a new member journey — A pinned welcome post, a #introduce-yourself channel, a DM or email from a community manager, a clear "start here" path.
  3. Surface member wins publicly — Showcase user projects, testimonials, milestones. This reinforces identity and signals that participation has rewards.
  4. Run recurring community rituals — Weekly threads (e.g., "What are you working on?"), monthly AMAs, seasonal challenges. Rituals create habit.
  5. Identify and invest in power users — participation is usually heavily skewed toward a small minority (Inferred; verify against this community's own posts-per-member distribution before quoting a ratio). Give the observed top contributors recognition, early access, moderator roles, or product input.

Building a Brand Ambassador / Advocate Program

  1. Identify candidates — Look for people who already recommend you unprompted. Check reviews, social mentions, community posts.
  2. Make the ask personal — Don't send a generic form. Reach out 1:1 and explain why you chose them specifically.
  3. Offer meaningful benefits — Exclusive access, swag, revenue share, or public recognition — not just "early access to features."
  4. Give them tools and content — Referral links, shareable assets, key talking points, a private Slack channel.
  5. Measure and iterate — Track referral traffic, signups, and engagement driven by advocates. Double down on what works.

Community-Led Support (Deflection + Retention)

  1. Create a searchable knowledge base from top community questions
  2. Recognize members who help others — "Community Expert" badges, leaderboards, shoutouts
  3. Close the loop with product — When community feedback drives a change, announce it publicly and credit the members who raised it
  4. Monitor sentiment weekly — Look for patterns in complaints or confusion before they become churn signals

Platform Selection Guide

Platform Best For Watch Out For
Discord Developer, gaming, creator communities; real-time chat High noise, hard to search, onboarding friction
Slack B2B / professional communities; familiar to SaaS buyers Free tier limits history; feels like work
Circle Creator or course-based communities; clean UX Less organic discovery; requires driving traffic
Reddit High-volume public communities; SEO benefit You don't own it; moderation is hard
Facebook Groups Consumer brands; older demographics Declining organic reach; algorithm dependent
Forum (Discourse) Long-form technical communities; SEO-rich Slower velocity; higher effort to post

Community Health Metrics

Track these signals weekly. Label every number by evidence class — Boundaries below forbids stating any of them without a source, window, and denominator:

  • Observed — read directly from the platform's admin view or export. Name the view and the date pulled.
  • Computed — derived from observed values. Show the formula and the denominator (new member post rate = new members posting within 7 days / members who joined in the same window).
  • Inferred — a hypothesis to test, including any benchmark taken from outside this community. Never word it as this community's fact.
  • Unknown — the platform does not expose the measure. State what would resolve it.

Metrics:

  • DAU/MAU ratio — Stickiness (Computed: daily actives / monthly actives). A 20% floor is an Inferred cross-industry benchmark, not this community's healthy line; compare against its own trailing weeks.
  • New member post rate — % of new members who post within 7 days of joining
  • Thread reply rate — % of posts that receive at least one reply
  • Churn / lurker ratio — Members who joined but haven't posted in 30+ days
  • Content created by non-staff — % of posts not written by the company team

Warning signs:

  • Most posts are from the company team, not members
  • Questions go unanswered for >24 hours
  • Engagement concentrates in a handful of accounts — compute the share of posts from the top 5 posters over a stated window before calling it a warning
  • New members stop posting after their intro message

Output Formats

Depending on what the user needs, produce one of:

  • Community Strategy Doc — Platform choice, identity definition, core loop, 90-day launch plan
  • Channel Architecture — Recommended channels/categories with purpose and posting guidelines for each
  • New Member Journey — Welcome sequence: pinned post, DM template, first-week prompts
  • Community Ritual Calendar — Weekly/monthly recurring events and threads
  • Ambassador Program Brief — Criteria, benefits, outreach template, tracking plan
  • Health Audit Report — Current metrics, diagnosis, top 3 priorities to fix

Always be specific. Generic advice ("be consistent," "provide value") is not useful. Give the user something they can act on today.

Community Strategy Doc — exact headings

# <Community name> — Strategy

## Identity
Member identity reinforced: <who members are or aspire to be>
Who is explicitly not the member: <exclusion>

## Platform Choice
Chosen: <platform> | Rejected: <platform> because <watch-out from the table>
Evidence class for any cited benchmark: Observed | Computed | Inferred | Unknown

## Core Loop
Weekly member action: <one action>
What makes it easy: <mechanic>
How it is rewarded publicly: <mechanic>
Where new value re-enters: <mechanic>

## Seeding Plan
Founding members (20–50, manually recruited): <source list>
Pre-launch seed posts: <5–10 topics that model the behavior>
Culture statement: <what great participation looks like here>

## 90-Day Plan
Days 0–30 | Days 31–60 | Days 61–90 — for each: goal, rituals live,
owner, primary metric with its denominator

## Measurement
Primary metric: <metric> = <formula> / <denominator>, window <n> days
Diagnostics (2–4): <metric + evidence class each>

## Open Gates
<authorization or evidence still missing; use the halt contract below>

The other five deliverables use these headings:

  • Channel Architecture — Channel | Purpose | Who posts | Posting rules | Success signal
  • New Member Journey — Pinned post / DM template / Day 1–7 prompts / First-win definition / Drop-off checkpoint
  • Community Ritual Calendar — Ritual | Cadence | Owner | Member job | Kill condition
  • Ambassador Program Brief — Criteria / Benefits / Outreach template / Disclosure requirement / Tracking plan
  • Health Audit Report — Metrics with evidence class and denominator / Diagnosis / Top 3 priorities / What would disprove the diagnosis

Halt Contract

Use this exact format when authorization, evidence, or an enforcement decision blocks the requested result — including the space-creation, invite, role, moderation, removal, and announcement gate and the enforcement-outcome gate in Boundaries:

HALT — <one-line blocker>
Why it blocks: <specific missing authority or evidence>
Resolve with:
1. <option>
2. <option>
3. <option, when useful>
Waiting for: <the exact item or approval>

Continue with safe drafts, plans, or worksheets only when they remain useful and do not imply the blocker was resolved.


Boundaries

  • Do not claim membership, engagement, retention, sentiment, or advocacy without a defined source, window, and denominator.
  • Do not create spaces, invite members, assign roles, moderate, remove content, or publish announcements without explicit authorization.
  • Do not manufacture activity, impersonate members, conceal incentives, or present paid advocacy as organic.
  • Do not decide enforcement outcomes beyond the documented community rules and escalation path.

Routing

  • Need referral or ambassador incentives -> use suede-referrals.
  • Need public social content -> use suede-social.
  • Need member-language research -> use suede-customer-research.
  • Need retention diagnosis beyond community behavior -> use suede-churn-prevention.
  • Need graphics for welcome posts, ritual announcements, or ambassador assets -> use suede-image; for video assets -> use suede-video.
  • Need a final anti-slop pass on member-facing copy before it ships -> use suede-deslop.
  • From those skills, route community purpose, platform, rituals, and moderation design back to suede-community-marketing.
Files (suede-creator-skills)
  • agents
    • openai.yaml 542 B
      interface:
        display_name: "Suede Community Marketing"
        short_description: "Build a community that compounds"
        default_prompt: "Use $suede-community-marketing on [target]. The user wants to start or grow a Discord, Slack, forum, or subreddit community around their product. Work through platform choice, seeding, rituals, moderation, and turning members into advocates, ground every recommendation in evidence the user can check, and return the decisions, the reasoning, and what to measure next."
      policy:
        allow_implicit_invocation: true
      
  • evals
    • evals.json 7.5 KB
      {
        "skill_name": "suede-community-marketing",
        "evals": [
          {
            "id": 1,
            "prompt": "We're a B2B SaaS that wants to start a community. Should we use Discord or Slack?",
            "expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should apply the platform selection guide. Should recommend Slack for B2B SaaS communities — familiar to SaaS buyers, professional context — but flag the trade-offs: free tier history limits, can feel like work. Should explain Discord is stronger for developer, gaming, or creator communities with real-time chat needs. Should consider the audience identity: if buyers are professionals during workday, Slack fits the moment; if they're hobbyists or developers, Discord may work. Should ask the user about their ideal community member and primary goal before fully committing. Should also note Circle as an alternative if they want clean UX without platform baggage.",
            "assertions": [
              "Checks for product-marketing.md",
              "Recommends Slack for B2B context",
              "Notes Slack free tier limitations",
              "Compares Discord use case",
              "Mentions Circle or other alternatives",
              "Asks about audience identity or goal"
            ],
            "files": []
          },
          {
            "id": 2,
            "prompt": "We just launched our community 3 weeks ago. We have 40 members but only 2-3 people post regularly. Everyone else just lurks. What do we do?",
            "expected_output": "Should diagnose this as the 'launching from zero' stage and apply that playbook. Should audit where members drop off and identify the 'leaky stage' — in this case, new member activation. Should recommend specific tactics: do things that don't scale (DM every new member personally, welcome them by name, host a weekly call), create a new member journey (pinned welcome post, #introduce-yourself channel, 'start here' path), seed conversations (post 5-10 messages modeling the behavior you want), define the core loop (what action should members take weekly), surface member wins publicly. Should warn that 1% of members typically generate 90% of value at this stage — identifying and investing in those few power users matters more than chasing the lurkers. Should reference the warning signs: most posts from company team is a red flag.",
            "assertions": [
              "Diagnoses as launch-stage / new member activation problem",
              "Applies 'launching from zero' playbook",
              "Recommends DMs to new members",
              "Recommends new member journey design",
              "Recommends seeding conversations",
              "Mentions the 1% / 90% power user dynamic",
              "Mentions warning sign of company-dominated posts"
            ],
            "files": []
          },
          {
            "id": 3,
            "prompt": "Help me write community guidelines for our Discord. We're building a community for indie game developers.",
            "expected_output": "Should apply 'build around a shared identity' principle — the community is for indie game devs, the identity is being a scrappy maker shipping games. Should write guidelines that describe the *vibe*, not just the rules. Should answer: what does great participation look like here? Should include both rules (no spam, no harassment, no piracy) AND aspirational guidance (share works-in-progress freely, give constructive feedback, lift other devs up). Should reinforce the identity throughout. Should keep the tone matching the audience — indie game devs respond to plainspoken, no-corporate-speak. May suggest channels structure that reinforces the identity (e.g., #devlog, #playtest-requests, #publishing-tips).",
            "assertions": [
              "Reinforces shared identity (indie game devs)",
              "Describes vibe, not just rules",
              "Includes both rules and aspirational guidance",
              "Tone matches audience (indie maker)",
              "May suggest channel structure"
            ],
            "files": []
          },
          {
            "id": 4,
            "prompt": "Design an ambassador program for our community. We have about 5,000 members and a few that always help others. Want to give them more recognition.",
            "expected_output": "Should apply the 'Building a Brand Ambassador / Advocate Program' playbook. Should recommend: identify candidates by looking at who already recommends and helps unprompted (check posts, replies, reviews, social mentions), make the ask personal 1:1 and explain why you chose them specifically, offer meaningful benefits beyond 'early access' (exclusive access, swag, revenue share, public recognition, direct product input), give them tools (referral links, shareable assets, talking points, private Slack channel), measure and iterate (track referral traffic, signups, engagement driven by advocates). Should cross-reference suede-referrals for structured incentive programs. Should warn against generic forms and impersonal asks.",
            "assertions": [
              "Identifies candidates from existing helpful behavior",
              "Recommends personal 1:1 ask",
              "Suggests meaningful benefits beyond early access",
              "Mentions tools/assets to enable advocates",
              "Includes measurement plan",
              "May cross-reference suede-referrals"
            ],
            "files": []
          },
          {
            "id": 5,
            "prompt": "Our community feels dead. Members joined 6 months ago but most haven't posted in months. How do I tell if it's salvageable?",
            "expected_output": "Should run the Health Audit Report output format. Should reference the community health metrics: DAU/MAU ratio (above 20% is healthy), new member post rate (% who post within 7 days), thread reply rate, churn / lurker ratio, % of content created by non-staff. Should list the warning signs: most posts from company team, questions go unanswered >24 hours, same 5 people account for 80%+ of engagement, new members stop posting after intro. Should recommend audit steps to diagnose: pull the metrics, look at posting patterns, talk to disengaged members. Should give honest assessment criteria — sometimes the answer is to relaunch with a new identity, sometimes a few rituals can revive it. Should propose the top 3 priorities to fix based on common patterns.",
            "assertions": [
              "Uses Health Audit Report format",
              "References specific health metrics with benchmarks",
              "Lists warning signs",
              "Recommends concrete audit steps",
              "Considers that some communities can't be saved",
              "Proposes top 3 priorities"
            ],
            "files": []
          },
          {
            "id": 6,
            "prompt": "We use our community mainly for support. How do we reduce ticket volume without making customers feel ignored?",
            "expected_output": "Should apply the 'Community-Led Support (Deflection + Retention)' playbook. Should recommend: create a searchable knowledge base from top community questions, recognize members who help others (Community Expert badges, leaderboards, shoutouts — this incentivizes peer support), close the loop with product (when community feedback drives a change, announce it publicly and credit members), monitor sentiment weekly to catch churn signals early. Should note that community-led support works best when peer answers are recognized as valuable, not as a way to dodge company responsibility. Should warn against the warning sign of questions going unanswered >24 hours.",
            "assertions": [
              "Applies community-led support playbook",
              "Recommends searchable knowledge base from community Q&A",
              "Recommends recognizing peer helpers",
              "Mentions closing the loop with product",
              "Warns about unanswered questions threshold",
              "Notes peer support must feel valued, not used"
            ],
            "files": []
          }
        ]
      }
      
  • CARD.md 4.3 KB
    # Skill Card — Suede Community Marketing
    
    <!-- Generated by scripts/build-skill-cards.mjs — do not hand-edit. -->
    <!-- Regenerate with: npm run build:cards -->
    
    Release record for the `suede-community-marketing` skill, following the NVIDIA skill-card template (<https://docs.nvidia.com/skills/skill-cards>). It tells a reviewer what the skill does, who owns it, what it needs, what could go wrong, and what evidence backs the release — without requiring them to open the source first.
    
    ## Description
    
    Suede-owned community-growth discipline for member purpose, platform choice, seeding, rituals, moderation, health metrics, and earned advocacy.
    
    Status: production. Ships in the `suede-skills` plugin (the full pack) at release 0.19.0; loads as a Claude Code / Codex agent skill from this directory's [SKILL.md](./SKILL.md).
    
    ## Owner
    
    Jason Colapietro, Suede Labs AI (<https://github.com/JasonColapietro>). Security contact: `info@suedeai.ai` per [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md).
    
    ## License / Terms of Use
    
    MIT ([LICENSE](../../LICENSE)). The pack's combined license expression is `MIT AND BSD-3-Clause`; this skill bundles no third-party licensed material of its own.
    
    ## Use Case
    
    Target users: developers and creators running the skill inside a Claude Code or Codex CLI session.
    
    Use when starting, auditing, or growing a Discord, Slack, forum, subreddit, or comparable product community.
    
    Out of scope — public social-channel content (use suede-social), referral-program mechanics (use suede-referrals), or customer-interview research (use suede-customer-research).
    
    ## Deployment Geography
    
    Global. The skill is a prompt-and-script package that runs locally inside the invoking agent session; it pins no region-specific service of its own.
    
    ## Requirements / Dependencies
    
    - A Claude Code or Codex CLI session with the `suede-skills` plugin installed (install options: <https://skills.suedeai.ai/>).
    - Bundled files loaded relative to this directory: `agents/` (1 file).
    - Credentials: none are bundled or required by the skill files. Any tool or API credentials come from the host session; never paste credentials into skill files, prompts, or outputs.
    
    ## Known Risks and Mitigations
    
    - Risk: an agent treats a quality gate as autonomous authority. Mitigation: every gate in the pack is advisory — it changes what is reported, never what the user decided; only extreme-risk findings (data loss, credential exposure, legal/rights violations, payment mistakes, irreversible public damage) pause for the user's explicit choice.
    - Risk: a skill instruction is used to act outside its mandate. Mitigation: the hard limits in the skill body's "Boundaries" section, quoted below.
    
    From "Boundaries":
    
    - Do not claim membership, engagement, retention, sentiment, or advocacy without a defined source, window, and denominator.
    - Do not create spaces, invite members, assign roles, moderate, remove content, or publish announcements without explicit authorization.
    - Do not manufacture activity, impersonate members, conceal incentives, or present paid advocacy as organic.
    - Do not decide enforcement outcomes beyond the documented community rules and escalation path.
    
    ## References
    
    - Skill source: [`skills/suede-community-marketing/SKILL.md`](./SKILL.md)
    - Rendered reference page: <https://skills.suedeai.ai/skills/suede-community-marketing.html>
    - Security policy and reviewed scanner exceptions: [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md) and [`.plugin-scanner.toml`](../../.plugin-scanner.toml) at the repo root
    
    ## Skill Output
    
    Structured Markdown returned in the agent's response, shaped by the output contract defined in the skill body: "Output Formats". The skill publishes, posts, and sends nothing without the user's explicit authorization; delivery decisions stay with the user.
    
    ## Skill Version
    
    0.19.0 — the pack is single-versioned, so every skill releases together; see [VERSION](../../VERSION) and [CITATION.cff](../../CITATION.cff) for the release identifier this card describes.
    
    ## Ethical Considerations
    
    - The skill produces recommendations for a human decision-maker. Publishing, sending, payment, and rights decisions stay with the user.
    - Its gates require verifiable claims and honest reporting; do not use the skill to fabricate claims, evidence, metrics, or attribution.
    - Report suspected misuse or a security concern privately per [SECURITY.md](../../SECURITY.md); do not open a public issue for it.
    
  • SKILL.md 11.7 KB
    ---
    name: suede-community-marketing
    description: "Suede-owned community-growth discipline for member purpose, platform choice, seeding, rituals, moderation, health metrics, and earned advocacy. Use when starting, auditing, or growing a Discord, Slack, forum, subreddit, or comparable product community. NOT FOR: public social-channel content (use suede-social), referral-program mechanics (use suede-referrals), or customer-interview research (use suede-customer-research)."
    metadata:
      version: 2.0.0
    ---
    
    # Suede Community Marketing
    
    Use this Suede community-growth playbook to create genuine member value and measurable business outcomes without manufacturing engagement.
    
    ## Before You Start
    
    **Check for product marketing context first:**
    If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.
    
    Understand the situation (ask if not provided):
    
    1. **What is the product or brand?** — What problem does it solve, who uses it
    2. **What community platform(s) are in play?** — Discord, Slack, Circle, Reddit, Facebook Groups, forum, etc.
    3. **What stage is the community at?** — Pre-launch, 0–100 members, 100–1k, scaling, or established
    4. **What is the primary community goal?** — Retention, activation, word-of-mouth, support deflection, product feedback, revenue
    5. **Who is the ideal community member?** — Role, motivation, what they hope to get from joining
    
    Work with whatever context is available. If key details are missing, make reasonable assumptions and flag them.
    
    ---
    
    ## Community Strategy Principles
    
    ### Build around a shared identity, not just a product
    
    The strongest communities are built around who members *are* or aspire to be — not around your product. Members join because of the product but stay because of the people and identity.
    
    Example: r/homelab — the identity is tinkerers who self-host, and every ritual,
    channel, and recognition mechanic in it reinforces that self-image.
    
    Always define: **What identity does this community reinforce for its members?**
    
    ### Value must flow to members first
    
    Every community touchpoint should answer: *What does the member get from this?*
    
    - Exclusive knowledge or early access
    - Peer connections they can't get elsewhere
    - Recognition and status within a group they respect
    - Direct influence on the product roadmap
    - Career opportunities, visibility, or credibility
    
    ---
    
    ## Playbooks by Goal
    
    ### Launching a Community from Zero
    
    1. **Recruit 20–50 founding members manually** — DM your most engaged users, beta testers, or fans. Don't open publicly until there is baseline activity.
    2. **Set the culture explicitly** — Write community guidelines that describe the *vibe*, not just the rules. What does great participation look like here?
    3. **Seed conversations before launch** — Pre-populate channels with 5–10 posts that model the behavior you want. Questions, wins, resources.
    4. **Do things that don't scale at first** — Reply to every post. Welcome every new member by name. Host a weekly call. You are buying social proof.
    5. **Define your core loop** — What action do you want members to take weekly? Make it easy and reward it publicly.
    
    ### Growing an Existing Community
    
    1. **Audit where members drop off** — Are people joining but not posting? Posting once and disappearing? Identify the leaky stage.
    2. **Create a new member journey** — A pinned welcome post, a #introduce-yourself channel, a DM or email from a community manager, a clear "start here" path.
    3. **Surface member wins publicly** — Showcase user projects, testimonials, milestones. This reinforces identity and signals that participation has rewards.
    4. **Run recurring community rituals** — Weekly threads (e.g., "What are you working on?"), monthly AMAs, seasonal challenges. Rituals create habit.
    5. **Identify and invest in power users** — participation is usually heavily
       skewed toward a small minority (Inferred; verify against this community's own
       posts-per-member distribution before quoting a ratio). Give the observed top
       contributors recognition, early access, moderator roles, or product input.
    
    ### Building a Brand Ambassador / Advocate Program
    
    1. **Identify candidates** — Look for people who already recommend you unprompted. Check reviews, social mentions, community posts.
    2. **Make the ask personal** — Don't send a generic form. Reach out 1:1 and explain why you chose them specifically.
    3. **Offer meaningful benefits** — Exclusive access, swag, revenue share, or public recognition — not just "early access to features."
    4. **Give them tools and content** — Referral links, shareable assets, key talking points, a private Slack channel.
    5. **Measure and iterate** — Track referral traffic, signups, and engagement driven by advocates. Double down on what works.
    
    ### Community-Led Support (Deflection + Retention)
    
    1. **Create a searchable knowledge base** from top community questions
    2. **Recognize members who help others** — "Community Expert" badges, leaderboards, shoutouts
    3. **Close the loop with product** — When community feedback drives a change, announce it publicly and credit the members who raised it
    4. **Monitor sentiment weekly** — Look for patterns in complaints or confusion before they become churn signals
    
    ---
    
    ## Platform Selection Guide
    
    | Platform | Best For | Watch Out For |
    |----------|----------|---------------|
    | Discord | Developer, gaming, creator communities; real-time chat | High noise, hard to search, onboarding friction |
    | Slack | B2B / professional communities; familiar to SaaS buyers | Free tier limits history; feels like work |
    | Circle | Creator or course-based communities; clean UX | Less organic discovery; requires driving traffic |
    | Reddit | High-volume public communities; SEO benefit | You don't own it; moderation is hard |
    | Facebook Groups | Consumer brands; older demographics | Declining organic reach; algorithm dependent |
    | Forum (Discourse) | Long-form technical communities; SEO-rich | Slower velocity; higher effort to post |
    
    ---
    
    ## Community Health Metrics
    
    Track these signals weekly. Label every number by evidence class — Boundaries
    below forbids stating any of them without a source, window, and denominator:
    
    - **Observed** — read directly from the platform's admin view or export. Name
      the view and the date pulled.
    - **Computed** — derived from observed values. Show the formula and the
      denominator (`new member post rate = new members posting within 7 days /
      members who joined in the same window`).
    - **Inferred** — a hypothesis to test, including any benchmark taken from
      outside this community. Never word it as this community's fact.
    - **Unknown** — the platform does not expose the measure. State what would
      resolve it.
    
    Metrics:
    
    - **DAU/MAU ratio** — Stickiness (Computed: daily actives / monthly actives).
      A 20% floor is an Inferred cross-industry benchmark, not this community's
      healthy line; compare against its own trailing weeks.
    - **New member post rate** — % of new members who post within 7 days of joining
    - **Thread reply rate** — % of posts that receive at least one reply
    - **Churn / lurker ratio** — Members who joined but haven't posted in 30+ days
    - **Content created by non-staff** — % of posts not written by the company team
    
    **Warning signs:**
    - Most posts are from the company team, not members
    - Questions go unanswered for >24 hours
    - Engagement concentrates in a handful of accounts — compute the share of posts
      from the top 5 posters over a stated window before calling it a warning
    - New members stop posting after their intro message
    
    ---
    
    ## Output Formats
    
    Depending on what the user needs, produce one of:
    
    - **Community Strategy Doc** — Platform choice, identity definition, core loop, 90-day launch plan
    - **Channel Architecture** — Recommended channels/categories with purpose and posting guidelines for each
    - **New Member Journey** — Welcome sequence: pinned post, DM template, first-week prompts
    - **Community Ritual Calendar** — Weekly/monthly recurring events and threads
    - **Ambassador Program Brief** — Criteria, benefits, outreach template, tracking plan
    - **Health Audit Report** — Current metrics, diagnosis, top 3 priorities to fix
    
    Always be specific. Generic advice ("be consistent," "provide value") is not useful. Give the user something they can act on today.
    
    ### Community Strategy Doc — exact headings
    
    ```markdown
    # <Community name> — Strategy
    
    ## Identity
    Member identity reinforced: <who members are or aspire to be>
    Who is explicitly not the member: <exclusion>
    
    ## Platform Choice
    Chosen: <platform> | Rejected: <platform> because <watch-out from the table>
    Evidence class for any cited benchmark: Observed | Computed | Inferred | Unknown
    
    ## Core Loop
    Weekly member action: <one action>
    What makes it easy: <mechanic>
    How it is rewarded publicly: <mechanic>
    Where new value re-enters: <mechanic>
    
    ## Seeding Plan
    Founding members (20–50, manually recruited): <source list>
    Pre-launch seed posts: <5–10 topics that model the behavior>
    Culture statement: <what great participation looks like here>
    
    ## 90-Day Plan
    Days 0–30 | Days 31–60 | Days 61–90 — for each: goal, rituals live,
    owner, primary metric with its denominator
    
    ## Measurement
    Primary metric: <metric> = <formula> / <denominator>, window <n> days
    Diagnostics (2–4): <metric + evidence class each>
    
    ## Open Gates
    <authorization or evidence still missing; use the halt contract below>
    ```
    
    The other five deliverables use these headings:
    
    - **Channel Architecture** — Channel | Purpose | Who posts | Posting rules | Success signal
    - **New Member Journey** — Pinned post / DM template / Day 1–7 prompts / First-win definition / Drop-off checkpoint
    - **Community Ritual Calendar** — Ritual | Cadence | Owner | Member job | Kill condition
    - **Ambassador Program Brief** — Criteria / Benefits / Outreach template / Disclosure requirement / Tracking plan
    - **Health Audit Report** — Metrics with evidence class and denominator / Diagnosis / Top 3 priorities / What would disprove the diagnosis
    
    ---
    
    ## Halt Contract
    
    Use this exact format when authorization, evidence, or an enforcement decision
    blocks the requested result — including the space-creation, invite, role,
    moderation, removal, and announcement gate and the enforcement-outcome gate in
    Boundaries:
    
    ```text
    HALT — <one-line blocker>
    Why it blocks: <specific missing authority or evidence>
    Resolve with:
    1. <option>
    2. <option>
    3. <option, when useful>
    Waiting for: <the exact item or approval>
    ```
    
    Continue with safe drafts, plans, or worksheets only when they remain useful
    and do not imply the blocker was resolved.
    
    ---
    
    ## Boundaries
    
    - Do not claim membership, engagement, retention, sentiment, or advocacy without a defined source, window, and denominator.
    - Do not create spaces, invite members, assign roles, moderate, remove content, or publish announcements without explicit authorization.
    - Do not manufacture activity, impersonate members, conceal incentives, or present paid advocacy as organic.
    - Do not decide enforcement outcomes beyond the documented community rules and escalation path.
    
    ## Routing
    
    - Need referral or ambassador incentives -> use `suede-referrals`.
    - Need public social content -> use `suede-social`.
    - Need member-language research -> use `suede-customer-research`.
    - Need retention diagnosis beyond community behavior -> use `suede-churn-prevention`.
    - Need graphics for welcome posts, ritual announcements, or ambassador assets -> use `suede-image`; for video assets -> use `suede-video`.
    - Need a final anti-slop pass on member-facing copy before it ships -> use `suede-deslop`.
    - From those skills, route community purpose, platform, rituals, and moderation design back to `suede-community-marketing`.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related