spatial-statistics
Always invoke before testing a geographic pattern for clustering, hotspots, dependence, or explanatory regression, even when aggregation or ordinary OLS is proposed as routine. Covers Moran's I, LISA, Getis-Ord Gi*, weights, MAUP and scale sensitivity for areas/grids, residual de
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/muend/geoai-skills/tree/main/skills/spatial-statistics
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install muend-geoai-skills@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/muend/geoai-skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole muend/geoai-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Spatial Statistics
Purpose: answer "is it clustered, where, and why" with defensible inference. The core discipline: spatial data violates independence assumptions, so standard statistics silently overstate significance — every analysis here starts with weights design and ends with residual diagnostics.
Spatial weights (W) — the analysis IS the weights
Every result downstream depends on W; choose it for substantive reasons and run a sensitivity check with one alternative:
| Weights | Use when |
|---|---|
| Queen/Rook contiguity | Irregular polygons (admin units, parcels) |
| K-nearest neighbors | Points; islands present (contiguity leaves them unconnected) |
| Distance band | Physical process with known range |
| Kernel (distance-decayed) | Smooth influence, GWR-style local models |
from libpysal.weights import Queen
w = Queen.from_dataframe(gdf, use_index=True)
print(f"islands: {w.islands}") # unconnected units break stats — fix or document
w.transform = "r" # row-standardize (default for Moran/lag models)
Always report: weights type, parameters, number of islands, and whether results survive an alternative W.
Global → local workflow
- Global Moran's I (
esda.Moran, permutation inference ≥999) — answers "any clustering at all?" Report I, p_sim, and the permutation distribution, not the analytical p. - LISA / local Moran (
esda.Moran_Local) — maps WHERE: High-High, Low-Low clusters, High-Low/Low-High outliers. Correct for multiple testing (FDR at minimum) before coloring a map — uncorrected LISA maps overstate clusters and this is the field's most common abuse. - Getis-Ord Gi* (
esda.G_Local, star=True) — hot/cold spots of intensity (a distinct question from Moran clusters — Gi* finds concentrations of high values, LISA finds similarity structure). - Rates, not counts, for population-based phenomena; use Empirical Bayes
smoothing (
esda.smoothing) for small-population units before any of the above — raw rates in sparse units are noise.
Point patterns
- Separate first-order intensity (density varies) from second-order
interaction (points attract/repel) — KDE describes the former, Ripley's
K/L (
pointpats) tests the latter. - Always test against an inhomogeneous null when the study area has obvious density gradients (population, roads); CSR against a city is a strawman.
- KDE bandwidth drives the story: report it, justify it (Silverman/CV), and show one alternative.
Spatial regression decision path
Run OLS first, then diagnose — never start with a spatial model:
from spreg import OLS
ols = OLS(y, X, w=w, spat_diag=True, moran=True, name_y="price", name_x=xnames)
Decision (Anselin's rule via LM tests): LM-Lag significant & LM-Error not → spatial lag (SAR); reverse → spatial error (SEM); both → compare robust LM versions; neither → OLS stands (report that as a finding). Interpretation caveats: in SAR, coefficients are NOT marginal effects — report direct/indirect (spillover) effects. In SEM, spatial structure is nuisance correlation, no spillover story allowed.
GWR/MGWR (mgwr): when relationships plausibly vary over space.
Bandwidth by AICc search; map local coefficients WITH local t-values masked
for insignificance; MGWR when predictors operate at different scales.
GWR is exploratory — resist causal language on local coefficients.
Inference honesty
- Permutation p-values over analytical ones wherever available.
- Multiple testing: n local tests = n units; FDR-correct.
- MAUP (modifiable areal unit problem): results can flip with unit aggregation — if the aggregation level is a choice, test one alternative and disclose.
- Spatial autocorrelation in residuals after modeling = model still wrong; report residual Moran's I for every final model.
- Correlation ≠ causation applies doubly here: spatially confounded variables (everything correlates with "distance to coast") demand explicit identification strategies before causal claims.
Reporting template
## Spatial analysis: <question>
- Units & n, variable(s), rate smoothing: <...>
- W: <type/params>, islands: <n>, sensitivity W: <type>
- Global: Moran's I = <> (p_perm = <>)
- Local: <k> significant clusters after FDR; map attached
- Model: <OLS/SAR/SEM/GWR> chosen because <LM diagnostics>
- Residual Moran's I: <> — <interpretation>
- Caveats: MAUP, W-sensitivity, causal limits
Execution contract
- Workflow: define inferential question and unit; inspect distributions and rates; construct and justify spatial weights; run global before local tests; fit models if needed; diagnose residual dependence; report uncertainty.
- Decision rules: use spatial statistics for dependence and inference, geostatistics for interpolating sampled continuous surfaces, and predictive ML when out-of-sample prediction is the primary goal.
- Verification protocol: test alternative weights and aggregation, use valid permutation or model inference, correct local multiplicity, inspect residual Moran's I, and distinguish association from causation.
- Failure modes: withhold inferential claims for arbitrary weights, islands ignored, unstable MAUP results, uncorrected multiple tests, residual autocorrelation, or unsupported causal language.
- Deliverables: analysis-ready variables, weights specification, global and local results, corrected significance, diagnostic maps, model and residual checks, sensitivity analysis, and caveats.
- Source freshness: consult the authoritative source registry before applying version-sensitive statistical APIs or defaults.
Files (geoai-skills)
-
agents
-
openai.yaml 214 B
interface: display_name: "Spatial Statistics" short_description: "Run rigorous spatial statistical analysis" default_prompt: "Use $spatial-statistics to select and verify the right spatial inference method."
-
-
references
-
authoritative-sources.md 750 B
# Authoritative sources - Last verified: 2026-07-19 - Review cadence: every 6 months - Refresh triggers: PySAL component major release or inferential API change ## Canonical sources - [libpysal documentation](https://pysal.org/libpysal/) — spatial weights and core data structures. - [esda documentation](https://pysal.org/esda/) — global and local spatial autocorrelation statistics. - [spreg documentation](https://pysal.org/spreg/) — spatial regression models and diagnostics. - [pointpats documentation](https://pysal.org/pointpats/) — point-pattern analysis. Record analysis units, weights construction and transformation, islands, permutations, random seed, multiple-testing correction, model version, and sensitivity alternatives.
-
-
SKILL.md 6.2 KB
--- name: spatial-statistics description: >- Always invoke before testing a geographic pattern for clustering, hotspots, dependence, or explanatory regression, even when aggregation or ordinary OLS is proposed as routine. Covers Moran's I, LISA, Getis-Ord Gi*, weights, MAUP and scale sensitivity for areas/grids, residual dependence, and spatial lag/error/GWR/MGWR models. Use ML standards for predictive evaluation and geostatistics for continuous surfaces from sparse samples. license: MIT metadata: author: Muhammed Enes Duran --- # Spatial Statistics Purpose: answer "is it clustered, where, and why" with defensible inference. The core discipline: spatial data violates independence assumptions, so standard statistics silently overstate significance — every analysis here starts with weights design and ends with residual diagnostics. ## Spatial weights (W) — the analysis IS the weights Every result downstream depends on W; choose it for substantive reasons and run a sensitivity check with one alternative: | Weights | Use when | |---|---| | Queen/Rook contiguity | Irregular polygons (admin units, parcels) | | K-nearest neighbors | Points; islands present (contiguity leaves them unconnected) | | Distance band | Physical process with known range | | Kernel (distance-decayed) | Smooth influence, GWR-style local models | ```python from libpysal.weights import Queen w = Queen.from_dataframe(gdf, use_index=True) print(f"islands: {w.islands}") # unconnected units break stats — fix or document w.transform = "r" # row-standardize (default for Moran/lag models) ``` Always report: weights type, parameters, number of islands, and whether results survive an alternative W. ## Global → local workflow 1. **Global Moran's I** (`esda.Moran`, permutation inference ≥999) — answers "any clustering at all?" Report I, p_sim, and the permutation distribution, not the analytical p. 2. **LISA / local Moran** (`esda.Moran_Local`) — maps WHERE: High-High, Low-Low clusters, High-Low/Low-High outliers. Correct for multiple testing (FDR at minimum) before coloring a map — uncorrected LISA maps overstate clusters and this is the field's most common abuse. 3. **Getis-Ord Gi\*** (`esda.G_Local`, star=True) — hot/cold spots of intensity (a distinct question from Moran clusters — Gi* finds concentrations of high values, LISA finds similarity structure). 4. Rates, not counts, for population-based phenomena; use Empirical Bayes smoothing (`esda.smoothing`) for small-population units before any of the above — raw rates in sparse units are noise. ## Point patterns - Separate first-order intensity (density varies) from second-order interaction (points attract/repel) — KDE describes the former, Ripley's K/L (`pointpats`) tests the latter. - Always test against an inhomogeneous null when the study area has obvious density gradients (population, roads); CSR against a city is a strawman. - KDE bandwidth drives the story: report it, justify it (Silverman/CV), and show one alternative. ## Spatial regression decision path Run OLS first, then diagnose — never start with a spatial model: ```python from spreg import OLS ols = OLS(y, X, w=w, spat_diag=True, moran=True, name_y="price", name_x=xnames) ``` Decision (Anselin's rule via LM tests): LM-Lag significant & LM-Error not → **spatial lag (SAR)**; reverse → **spatial error (SEM)**; both → compare robust LM versions; neither → OLS stands (report that as a finding). Interpretation caveats: in SAR, coefficients are NOT marginal effects — report direct/indirect (spillover) effects. In SEM, spatial structure is nuisance correlation, no spillover story allowed. **GWR/MGWR** (`mgwr`): when relationships plausibly vary over space. Bandwidth by AICc search; map local coefficients WITH local t-values masked for insignificance; MGWR when predictors operate at different scales. GWR is exploratory — resist causal language on local coefficients. ## Inference honesty - Permutation p-values over analytical ones wherever available. - Multiple testing: n local tests = n units; FDR-correct. - MAUP (modifiable areal unit problem): results can flip with unit aggregation — if the aggregation level is a choice, test one alternative and disclose. - Spatial autocorrelation in residuals after modeling = model still wrong; report residual Moran's I for every final model. - Correlation ≠ causation applies doubly here: spatially confounded variables (everything correlates with "distance to coast") demand explicit identification strategies before causal claims. ## Reporting template ``` ## Spatial analysis: <question> - Units & n, variable(s), rate smoothing: <...> - W: <type/params>, islands: <n>, sensitivity W: <type> - Global: Moran's I = <> (p_perm = <>) - Local: <k> significant clusters after FDR; map attached - Model: <OLS/SAR/SEM/GWR> chosen because <LM diagnostics> - Residual Moran's I: <> — <interpretation> - Caveats: MAUP, W-sensitivity, causal limits ``` ## Execution contract - **Workflow:** define inferential question and unit; inspect distributions and rates; construct and justify spatial weights; run global before local tests; fit models if needed; diagnose residual dependence; report uncertainty. - **Decision rules:** use spatial statistics for dependence and inference, geostatistics for interpolating sampled continuous surfaces, and predictive ML when out-of-sample prediction is the primary goal. - **Verification protocol:** test alternative weights and aggregation, use valid permutation or model inference, correct local multiplicity, inspect residual Moran's I, and distinguish association from causation. - **Failure modes:** withhold inferential claims for arbitrary weights, islands ignored, unstable MAUP results, uncorrected multiple tests, residual autocorrelation, or unsupported causal language. - **Deliverables:** analysis-ready variables, weights specification, global and local results, corrected significance, diagnostic maps, model and residual checks, sensitivity analysis, and caveats. - **Source freshness:** consult [the authoritative source registry](references/authoritative-sources.md) before applying version-sensitive statistical APIs or defaults.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.