recipe-plan
Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows/tree/main/dev-workflows-fullstack/skills/recipe-plan
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install shinpr-claude-code-workflows@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole shinpr/claude-code-workflows collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Explicit User Instruction: The user explicitly instructs and authorizes every subagent call named in this recipe. Execute each applicable call when its prerequisites are met.
Execute Skill: llm-friendly-context before writing Agent prompts, handoffs, or generated artifacts. Execute Skill: subagents-orchestration-guide before making workflow decisions, invoking agents, or resolving findings.
Context: Dedicated to the planning phase.
Orchestrator Definition
Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)
Local authority gate: Make this recipe's workflow decisions and validate each returned result directly; delegate semantic deliverable production to the named specialist.
Review Resolution Gate [MANDATORY]: Resolve every actionable deliverable-review finding through subagents-orchestration-guide Review Resolution before correction or progression.
Before the first finding disposition, read references/review-resolution.md from the loaded subagents-orchestration-guide skill.
Execution Protocol:
- Invoke named specialists for deliverable production — pass data between them and validate their results
- Follow subagents-orchestration-guide skill planning flow exactly:
- Execute steps defined below
- Stop and obtain approval for plan content before completion
- Scope: See Scope Boundaries below
At each Agent invocation below, build the prompt as a mechanical extraction: copy the named source values into the exact fields, apply only the declared serialization, then invoke immediately.
Acceptance-test-generator is part of this planning flow and may return no selected lanes when the Design Doc has no justified integration/E2E proof boundary.
Scope Boundaries
Included in this skill:
- Design document selection
- Test skeleton generation with acceptance-test-generator
- Work plan creation with work-planner
- Work plan review with document-reviewer
- Plan approval obtainment
Responsibility Boundary: This skill completes when the user authorizes implementation of the reviewed plan.
Follow the planning process below:
Execution Process
Step 1: Design Document Selection
- Use the Design Doc explicitly supplied in
$ARGUMENTSwhen present - Otherwise use the only Design Doc under
docs/design/when exactly one exists - Report when none exist; when multiple exist, present them for selection
Step 2: Test Skeleton Generation
- Invoke acceptance-test-generator with
design_docs: [selected Design Doc path]andconfirmed_requirement_contextas the approved PRD path named by its Requirement Convergence section, or that section's unchanged convergence record when no PRD exists - Follow subagents-orchestration-guide HC-06 for
value_input_requiredand its unknown-value continuation - Pass every non-null generated skeleton path to the next process; treat an evidence-backed empty lane as complete for that lane and continue to the next process
Step 3: Work Plan Creation
Invoke work-planner using Agent tool:
subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:work-planner"description: "Work plan creation"mode: createdesignDoc: [selected Design Doc path]prd: [approved PRD path]when one existstestSkeletons: [non-null generatedFiles paths]
Step 4: Work Plan Review
Invoke document-reviewer to review the work plan:
subagent_type: "dev-workflows-fullstack:document-reviewer"description: "Work plan review"prompt: "doc_type: WorkPlan target: docs/plans/[plan-name].md. Review the Work Plan's own Implementation Scope, tasks, Completion Criteria, dependencies, execution order, exact source-anchor existence, executable verification, and Review Scope. Governing Documents paths are citation sources only; keep issues limited to violations of cited obligations."- Run the Review Resolution Gate through correction re-review, its parent requirement or authority exits, and convergence, using work-planner in update mode for rerouted corrections. Present the plan for approval only at its convergence condition.
Step 5: Present for Approval
- Present the reviewed work plan to the user for batch approval. If the user requests changes, re-invoke work-planner with the user's requested changes verbatim and re-run Step 4.
- Record unresolved technical evidence or external dependencies in the plan with their affected task and verification boundary. Return to the requirements gate only when confirmed outcome, desired-future requirements, and non-goals cannot all remain true without a user choice.
Response at Completion
Recommended: After plan approval, output the standard block below.
Planning phase completed.
- Work plan: docs/plans/[plan-name].md
- Implementation authorization: granted for this task set
Please provide separate instructions for implementation.
When findings were declined during Work Plan review, append their IDs, governing reasons, and evidence to this completion response.
Files (claude-code-workflows)
-
SKILL.md 5 KB
--- name: recipe-plan description: Create work plan from design document and obtain plan approval disable-model-invocation: true --- **Explicit User Instruction**: The user explicitly instructs and authorizes every subagent call named in this recipe. Execute each applicable call when its prerequisites are met. Execute Skill: llm-friendly-context before writing Agent prompts, handoffs, or generated artifacts. Execute Skill: subagents-orchestration-guide before making workflow decisions, invoking agents, or resolving findings. **Context**: Dedicated to the planning phase. ## Orchestrator Definition **Core Identity**: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill) **Local authority gate**: Make this recipe's workflow decisions and validate each returned result directly; delegate semantic deliverable production to the named specialist. **Review Resolution Gate [MANDATORY]**: Resolve every actionable deliverable-review finding through subagents-orchestration-guide `Review Resolution` before correction or progression. Before the first finding disposition, read `references/review-resolution.md` from the loaded subagents-orchestration-guide skill. **Execution Protocol**: 1. **Invoke named specialists for deliverable production** — pass data between them and validate their results 2. **Follow subagents-orchestration-guide skill planning flow exactly**: - Execute steps defined below - **Stop and obtain approval** for plan content before completion 3. **Scope**: See Scope Boundaries below At each Agent invocation below, build the prompt as a mechanical extraction: copy the named source values into the exact fields, apply only the declared serialization, then invoke immediately. Acceptance-test-generator is part of this planning flow and may return no selected lanes when the Design Doc has no justified integration/E2E proof boundary. ## Scope Boundaries **Included in this skill**: - Design document selection - Test skeleton generation with acceptance-test-generator - Work plan creation with work-planner - Work plan review with document-reviewer - Plan approval obtainment **Responsibility Boundary**: This skill completes when the user authorizes implementation of the reviewed plan. Follow the planning process below: ## Execution Process ### Step 1: Design Document Selection - Use the Design Doc explicitly supplied in `$ARGUMENTS` when present - Otherwise use the only Design Doc under `docs/design/` when exactly one exists - Report when none exist; when multiple exist, present them for selection ### Step 2: Test Skeleton Generation - Invoke acceptance-test-generator with `design_docs: [selected Design Doc path]` and `confirmed_requirement_context` as the approved PRD path named by its Requirement Convergence section, or that section's unchanged convergence record when no PRD exists - Follow subagents-orchestration-guide HC-06 for `value_input_required` and its unknown-value continuation - Pass every non-null generated skeleton path to the next process; treat an evidence-backed empty lane as complete for that lane and continue to the next process ### Step 3: Work Plan Creation Invoke work-planner using Agent tool: - `subagent_type`: "dev-workflows-fullstack:work-planner" - `description`: "Work plan creation" - `mode: create` - `designDoc: [selected Design Doc path]` - `prd: [approved PRD path]` when one exists - `testSkeletons: [non-null generatedFiles paths]` ### Step 4: Work Plan Review Invoke document-reviewer to review the work plan: - `subagent_type`: "dev-workflows-fullstack:document-reviewer" - `description`: "Work plan review" - `prompt`: "doc_type: WorkPlan target: docs/plans/[plan-name].md. Review the Work Plan's own Implementation Scope, tasks, Completion Criteria, dependencies, execution order, exact source-anchor existence, executable verification, and Review Scope. Governing Documents paths are citation sources only; keep issues limited to violations of cited obligations." - Run the Review Resolution Gate through correction re-review, its parent requirement or authority exits, and convergence, using work-planner in update mode for rerouted corrections. Present the plan for approval only at its convergence condition. ### Step 5: Present for Approval - Present the reviewed work plan to the user for batch approval. If the user requests changes, re-invoke work-planner with the user's requested changes verbatim and re-run Step 4. - Record unresolved technical evidence or external dependencies in the plan with their affected task and verification boundary. Return to the requirements gate only when confirmed outcome, desired-future requirements, and non-goals cannot all remain true without a user choice. ## Response at Completion **Recommended**: After plan approval, output the standard block below. ``` Planning phase completed. - Work plan: docs/plans/[plan-name].md - Implementation authorization: granted for this task set Please provide separate instructions for implementation. ``` When findings were declined during Work Plan review, append their IDs, governing reasons, and evidence to this completion response.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.