pipeline-review
Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is noth
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc/tree/main/skills/pipeline-review
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install alebgl77-claude-inc@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole alebgl77/claude-inc collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor
"Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort."
When to use
- "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step)
- "What should I focus on this week?"
- "My forecast feels fake"
- Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation
- Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first
Workflow
- Normalise the data into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded.
- Apply the health checks: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent).
- Score priorities: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving.
- Prescribe per deal: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship).
- Summarise the week: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls").
- Forecast sanity line: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence.
Output format
## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y})
| Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week |
|------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------|
| ... | ... | 🟢🟡🔴 | ... | ... |
**Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ...
**Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send
**Systemic fix**: {the one habit}
Quality bar
- Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring"
- Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message
- Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion
- Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated
- The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal
Example
Ask: "12 deals pasted from my notes, which 3 matter?" Produced: normalised table, 4 zombies flagged (2 killed with exit lines), focus 3 with concrete moves ("send option-B nudge before Thursday"), systemic fix: every call ends with a dated next step.
Files (claude-inc)
-
SKILL.md 2.7 KB
--- name: pipeline-review description: Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is nothing closing", or shares a list of open deals. --- # Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor > "Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort." ## When to use - "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step) - "What should I focus on this week?" - "My forecast feels fake" - Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation - Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first ## Workflow 1. **Normalise the data** into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded. 2. **Apply the health checks**: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent). 3. **Score priorities**: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving. 4. **Prescribe per deal**: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship). 5. **Summarise the week**: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls"). 6. **Forecast sanity line**: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence. ## Output format ``` ## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y}) | Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week | |------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------| | ... | ... | 🟢🟡🔴 | ... | ... | **Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ... **Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send **Systemic fix**: {the one habit} ``` ## Quality bar - [ ] Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring" - [ ] Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message - [ ] Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion - [ ] Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated - [ ] The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal ## Example **Ask**: "12 deals pasted from my notes, which 3 matter?" **Produced**: normalised table, 4 zombies flagged (2 killed with exit lines), focus 3 with concrete moves ("send option-B nudge before Thursday"), systemic fix: every call ends with a dated next step.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.