Claude Skill

pipeline-review

Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is noth

LLM Mart · 0 points · 9 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download alebgl77-claude-inc-skills_pipeline-review-eb8654b.zip · 1 KB
Part of alebgl77/claude-inc — 50 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc/tree/main/skills/pipeline-review
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install alebgl77-claude-inc@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/alebgl77/claude-inc.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole alebgl77/claude-inc collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor

"Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort."

When to use

  • "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step)
  • "What should I focus on this week?"
  • "My forecast feels fake"
  • Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation
  • Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first

Workflow

  1. Normalise the data into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded.
  2. Apply the health checks: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent).
  3. Score priorities: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving.
  4. Prescribe per deal: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship).
  5. Summarise the week: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls").
  6. Forecast sanity line: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence.

Output format

## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y})

| Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week |
|------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------|
| ...  | ...   | 🟢🟡🔴 | ...       | ...                  |

**Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ...
**Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send
**Systemic fix**: {the one habit}

Quality bar

  • Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring"
  • Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message
  • Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion
  • Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated
  • The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal

Example

Ask: "12 deals pasted from my notes, which 3 matter?" Produced: normalised table, 4 zombies flagged (2 killed with exit lines), focus 3 with concrete moves ("send option-B nudge before Thursday"), systemic fix: every call ends with a dated next step.

Files (claude-inc)
  • SKILL.md 2.7 KB
    ---
    name: pipeline-review
    description: Audits pipeline health from a deal list (CSV, table or plain notes) — prioritises deals, flags zombies and single-threaded risks, checks close-date realism and outputs a weekly action plan. Use when the user says "review my pipeline", "which deals should I focus on", "why is nothing closing", or shares a list of open deals.
    ---
    
    # Pipeline Review — Pipeline Doctor
    
    > "Pipeline truth over pipeline comfort."
    
    ## When to use
    
    - "Review my pipeline" (paste/attach deals: name, value, stage, last contact, next step)
    - "What should I focus on this week?"
    - "My forecast feels fake"
    - Weekly ritual; also before any forecast conversation
    - Works from a CSV, a markdown table, or messy notes — it will structure them first
    
    ## Workflow
    
    1. **Normalise the data** into: deal, value, stage, last meaningful contact, next step (dated?), single or multi-threaded.
    2. **Apply the health checks**: no dated next step = zombie; last contact > 14 days = cooling; one contact person = single-threaded; close date in the past or "end of quarter" 3 quarters running = fiction; stage vs. evidence mismatch (e.g. "negotiation" but no proposal sent).
    3. **Score priorities**: value × probability × momentum. Big-but-dead loses to small-but-moving.
    4. **Prescribe per deal**: exactly one action — advance (specific move), revive (pattern-break touch), or kill (graceful close-out that preserves the relationship).
    5. **Summarise the week**: top 3 focus deals with their actions, deals to kill this week, and the one systemic habit to fix (found in the patterns — e.g. "you never set next steps on first calls").
    6. **Forecast sanity line**: weighted realistic total vs. optimistic total, in one sentence.
    
    ## Output format
    
    ```
    ## Pipeline review — {date} · {n} deals · realistic: {€X} (optimistic: {€Y})
    
    | Deal | Value | Health | Diagnosis | THE action this week |
    |------|-------|--------|-----------|----------------------|
    | ...  | ...   | 🟢🟡🔴 | ...       | ...                  |
    
    **Focus 3**: 1. {deal} → {action} 2. ... 3. ...
    **Kill list**: {deals} — with the close-out line to send
    **Systemic fix**: {the one habit}
    ```
    
    ## Quality bar
    
    - [ ] Every deal gets exactly one action, none gets "keep monitoring"
    - [ ] Zombies named and killed out loud, with a graceful exit message
    - [ ] Single-threaded deals flagged with a second-contact suggestion
    - [ ] Realistic vs. optimistic totals both stated
    - [ ] The systemic fix targets a pattern, not a deal
    
    ## Example
    
    **Ask**: "12 deals pasted from my notes, which 3 matter?"
    **Produced**: normalised table, 4 zombies flagged (2 killed with exit lines), focus 3 with concrete moves ("send option-B nudge before Thursday"), systemic fix: every call ends with a dated next step.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related