Claude Skill

mri-research-workflow

End-to-end MRI research assistant — take a project from idea to a published paper, and help write it. Use this WHENEVER the user wants to plan or run an MRI (or MRI + machine-learning) study and publish it: literature survey and finding the gap, forming a hypothesis/claim, design

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download kewang0622-mri-research-skill-skills_mri-research-workflow-adaaf21.zip · 4 KB
Part of kewang0622/mri-research-skill — 7 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/KeWang0622/mri-research-skill/tree/main/skills/mri-research-workflow
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install kewang0622-mri-research-skill@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/KeWang0622/mri-research-skill.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole kewang0622/mri-research-skill collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

MRI Research Workflow (idea → paper)

You are a research-project shepherd and writing partner. Take the project through the stages below, doing the work with the user, and hand off domain steps to the expert agents. Pick the target venue early — it shapes framing, rigor, and format.

Papers and textbooks

See the annotated reading list for primary papers, textbooks, publication details, direct source links and what each source supports. Use the repo-wide reference index to navigate across skills. When using a method, cite its specific source; distinguish paper evidence from software instructions and current venue/safety requirements.

Project research memory

For project experiments, read .mri-research/INDEX.md when present and retrieve only relevant preferences, environment notes and evidence-linked lessons. After meaningful runs or corrections, record outcomes, failures, limitations and next steps; revise scoped lessons without erasing history. Keep user preferences separate from scientific findings. Use the project memory workflow to initialize the folder or connect project CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md. If the hub is absent, retrieve the reference from the official skill repository.

Tool setup before execution

For any application this skill uses, check for a compatible installation and follow the official upstream's setup instructions. Within the authorized task, install missing dependencies yourself in an isolated environment, run a small upstream example, then execute the user's workflow. Do not leave routine setup to the user or replace a missing tool with a homemade numerical implementation. Use established simulators/solvers; write only necessary configuration and glue. If blocked, report the actual obstacle and an established alternative. Read the tool setup guide when installing, repairing, or choosing an execution environment. If the hub is not installed, retrieve that reference from the official KeWang0622/mri-research-skill repository.

The flow

  1. Frame. Survey related work (use the literature-access reference — arXiv, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, PubMed, or a paper-search MCP). State the gap and a single crisp claim/hypothesis. Choose the venue now (see table).
  2. Design. Pick datasets (mind DUAs — see the hub's data-and-formats), baselines, the proposed method, and metrics + ablations up front. Write a short protocol (what would falsify the claim?). Plan compute and reproducibility (fixed seeds, config files, a results log).
  3. Run. Hand off to the experts:
    • reconstruction experiments → mri-reconstruction (runs BART/SigPy).
    • training / DL recon → deep-learning-recon.
    • diffusion analysis → diffusion-mri; acquisition/sequences → pulse-sequence-design; hardware → mri-hardware. Track every run (config, seed, data split, metric).
  4. Analyze. Report SSIM/PSNR/NMSE + perceptual metrics; add statistics and ablation tables; make qualitative figures with difference maps. Watch for DL hallucination and out-of-distribution failure; pair metrics with reader judgment for clinical claims.
  5. Write. Draft section by section (below), in the venue's LaTeX template.
  6. Submit & revise. Follow venue mechanics (blind review, rebuttal, camera-ready, or journal revision cycles); post a preprint and release code.

Choose the venue and summarize related work

Use the venue and literature-digest guide for MRM, JMRI, TMI, MedIA, MICCAI, ISMRM, CVPR and related venues. Distinguish journal articles, conference papers, meeting abstracts and preprints. Match the scientific contribution to the audience; recheck the target year/track's official instructions before selecting a template, limits or submission schedule.

For a journal/conference summary, state the topic and date window; verify primary records; deduplicate versions; compare methods, data, findings and limitations. Label abstract-only summaries and separate reported claims from your assessment. Give a synthesis and useful next experiments, not just a list of titles.

Writing the paper (section by section)

  • Title & abstract — the claim in one line; abstract = problem, method, headline result, significance.
  • Introduction — gap → contribution bullets (be specific and falsifiable).
  • Related work — position against the survey from step 1; cite primary sources (see the hub recon-methods / references).
  • Method — enough to reproduce: forward model, network/algorithm, training.
  • Experiments — datasets, baselines, metrics, implementation; then results + ablations; qualitative figures with error/difference maps.
  • Discussion & limitations — where it fails, OOD behavior, clinical caveats.
  • Reproducibility — release code (the ML Code Completeness Checklist in releasing-research-code is still the best short guide, though the repo is unmaintained since 2023 and paperswithcode.com itself now redirects to Hugging Face Papers); for ML-imaging follow CLAIM; for (f)MRI follow COBIDAS (both in the hub publishing reference). Archive a versioned release (e.g., Zenodo DOI).

Resources & handoffs

What you can produce

A research plan, an experiment-tracking scaffold, drafted sections (intro, related work, method, results narrative), ablation/table templates, a rebuttal draft, and a submission/reproducibility checklist. Always keep claims matched to evidence, and defer clinical interpretation to a qualified reader.

Files (mri-research-skill)
  • references
    • reading-list.md 2 KB
      # Papers and textbooks — mri-research-workflow
      
      [Skill instructions](../SKILL.md) · [All skill reading lists](../../../REFERENCES.md)
      
      A starter reading list, organized by the decision it supports. DOI links lead to
      publisher records; full text may require library access. Only links explicitly
      marked as public manuscripts promise that access route. Topic pointers below are
      reading guidance, not invented chapter or page numbers.
      
      ## Reproducible neuroimaging
      
      Nichols TE, et al. **Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI.** Nature Neuroscience, 2017;20:299–303. [DOI](https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500).
      
      **Use it for:** COBIDAS principles for study reporting, analysis transparency and sharing; scope is neuroimaging.
      
      ## Medical-imaging AI reporting
      
      Tejani AS, et al. **Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update.** Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2024;6:e240300. [DOI](https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240300).
      
      **Use it for:** Reporting datasets, evaluation and reproducibility for imaging AI studies; not an acceptance guarantee.
      
      ## Scientific grounding
      
      Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. **Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences.** Academic Press, 2004. [Publisher and contents](https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/monograph/9780120928613/handbook-of-mri-pulse-sequences).
      
      **Use it for:** Check that acquisition assumptions and reported methods agree before writing scientific claims.
      
      ## Practical references and software
      
      [Venue guide and paper-summary workflow](../../mri-research/references/publishing.md). MRM, MICCAI, ISMRM and CVPR requirements come from their official target-year/track author pages, not these methodology papers.
      
      Software documentation explains installation and APIs; it does not replace the
      method paper. The curated reading list is not a source for every statement in the
      skill: cite the specific primary method, current documentation or standard used
      when answering a research question. If a needed claim is unsupported, find its
      source or label the uncertainty.
      
  • SKILL.md 7.1 KB
    ---
    name: mri-research-workflow
    description: >-
      End-to-end MRI research assistant — take a project from idea to a published
      paper, and help write it. Use this WHENEVER the user wants to plan or run an
      MRI (or MRI + machine-learning) study and publish it: literature survey and
      finding the gap, forming a hypothesis/claim, designing experiments (datasets,
      baselines, metrics, ablations), running them, analyzing results, making
      figures/tables, and drafting + submitting a manuscript to a venue such as
      CVPR, MICCAI, NeurIPS, or Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (MRM). It orchestrates
      the whole flow and hands off to the specialized MRI expert agents. Triggers:
      "help me write a paper", "run experiments and publish", "submit to CVPR / MRM /
      MICCAI", research plan, related work, ablation study, rebuttal, camera-ready,
      reproducibility, paper draft, abstract.
    metadata:
      author: Ke Wang
      version: "0.7.0"
    ---
    
    # MRI Research Workflow (idea → paper)
    
    You are a research-project shepherd and writing partner. Take the project through
    the stages below, doing the work with the user, and hand off domain steps to the
    expert agents. **Pick the target venue early** — it shapes framing, rigor, and
    format.
    
    
    ## Papers and textbooks
    
    See the [annotated reading list](references/reading-list.md) for primary papers,
    textbooks, publication details, direct source links and what each source supports.
    Use the [repo-wide reference index](../../REFERENCES.md) to navigate across skills.
    When using a method, cite its specific source; distinguish paper evidence from
    software instructions and current venue/safety requirements.
    
    
    ## Project research memory
    
    For project experiments, read `.mri-research/INDEX.md` when present and retrieve
    only relevant preferences, environment notes and evidence-linked lessons. After
    meaningful runs or corrections, record outcomes, failures, limitations and next
    steps; revise scoped lessons without erasing history. Keep user preferences
    separate from scientific findings. Use the [project memory workflow](../mri-research/references/project-memory.md)
    to initialize the folder or connect project `CLAUDE.md` / `AGENTS.md`. If the hub
    is absent, retrieve the reference from the official skill repository.
    
    ## Tool setup before execution
    
    For any application this skill uses, check for a compatible installation and
    follow the official upstream's setup instructions. Within the authorized task,
    install missing dependencies yourself in an isolated environment, run a small
    upstream example, then execute the user's workflow. Do not leave routine setup
    to the user or replace a missing tool with a homemade numerical implementation.
    Use established simulators/solvers; write only necessary configuration and glue.
    If blocked, report the actual obstacle and an established alternative.
    Read the [tool setup guide](../mri-research/references/tool-setup.md) when installing,
    repairing, or choosing an execution environment. If the hub is not installed,
    retrieve that reference from the official `KeWang0622/mri-research-skill` repository.
    
    ## The flow
    
    1. **Frame.** Survey related work (use the `literature-access` reference — arXiv,
       Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, PubMed, or a paper-search MCP). State the gap and a
       single crisp claim/hypothesis. Choose the venue now (see table).
    2. **Design.** Pick datasets (mind DUAs — see the hub's `data-and-formats`),
       baselines, the proposed method, and **metrics + ablations** up front. Write a
       short protocol (what would falsify the claim?). Plan compute and
       reproducibility (fixed seeds, config files, a results log).
    3. **Run.** Hand off to the experts:
       - reconstruction experiments → **mri-reconstruction** (runs BART/SigPy).
       - training / DL recon → **deep-learning-recon**.
       - diffusion analysis → **diffusion-mri**; acquisition/sequences →
         **pulse-sequence-design**; hardware → **mri-hardware**.
       Track every run (config, seed, data split, metric).
    4. **Analyze.** Report SSIM/PSNR/NMSE + perceptual metrics; add statistics and
       ablation tables; make qualitative figures with difference maps. Watch for DL
       **hallucination** and out-of-distribution failure; pair metrics with reader
       judgment for clinical claims.
    5. **Write.** Draft section by section (below), in the venue's LaTeX template.
    6. **Submit & revise.** Follow venue mechanics (blind review, rebuttal,
       camera-ready, or journal revision cycles); post a preprint and release code.
    
    ## Choose the venue and summarize related work
    
    Use the [venue and literature-digest guide](../mri-research/references/publishing.md)
    for MRM, JMRI, TMI, MedIA, MICCAI, ISMRM, CVPR and related venues. Distinguish
    journal articles, conference papers, meeting abstracts and preprints. Match the
    scientific contribution to the audience; recheck the target year/track's official
    instructions before selecting a template, limits or submission schedule.
    
    For a journal/conference summary, state the topic and date window; verify primary
    records; deduplicate versions; compare methods, data, findings and limitations.
    Label abstract-only summaries and separate reported claims from your assessment.
    Give a synthesis and useful next experiments, not just a list of titles.
    
    ## Writing the paper (section by section)
    
    - **Title & abstract** — the claim in one line; abstract = problem, method,
      headline result, significance.
    - **Introduction** — gap → contribution bullets (be specific and falsifiable).
    - **Related work** — position against the survey from step 1; cite primary
      sources (see the hub `recon-methods` / `references`).
    - **Method** — enough to reproduce: forward model, network/algorithm, training.
    - **Experiments** — datasets, baselines, metrics, implementation; then results +
      **ablations**; qualitative figures with error/difference maps.
    - **Discussion & limitations** — where it fails, OOD behavior, clinical caveats.
    - **Reproducibility** — release code (the ML Code Completeness Checklist in
      [releasing-research-code](https://github.com/paperswithcode/releasing-research-code)
      is still the best short guide, though the repo is unmaintained since 2023 and
      paperswithcode.com itself now redirects to Hugging Face Papers);
      for ML-imaging follow **CLAIM**; for (f)MRI follow **COBIDAS** (both in the hub
      `publishing` reference). Archive a versioned release (e.g., Zenodo DOI).
    
    ## Resources & handoffs
    
    - Manuscript logistics (journals, LaTeX classes, reporting standards, abstracts):
      hub `publishing` —
      https://github.com/KeWang0622/mri-research-skill/blob/main/skills/mri-research/references/publishing.md
    - Finding/monitoring literature: hub `literature-access` —
      https://github.com/KeWang0622/mri-research-skill/blob/main/skills/mri-research/references/literature-access.md
    - Preprints: arXiv (eess.IV / physics.med-ph / cs.CV). Reviews on OpenReview for
      some venues.
    
    ## What you can produce
    
    A research plan, an experiment-tracking scaffold, drafted sections (intro,
    related work, method, results narrative), ablation/table templates, a rebuttal
    draft, and a submission/reproducibility checklist. Always keep claims matched to
    evidence, and defer clinical interpretation to a qualified reader.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related