Claude Skill

messaging-the-human

Use when a human decision, access grant, external action, or escalation must survive the operator's absence, or when an orchestrator or PM has a judgment-worthy update for the operator.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 12 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download mvschwarz-openrig-skills__canonical_core_messaging-the-human-cc75efd.zip · 2 KB
Part of mvschwarz/openrig — 47 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/mvschwarz/openrig/tree/main/skills/_canonical/core/messaging-the-human
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install mvschwarz-openrig@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/mvschwarz/openrig.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole mvschwarz/openrig collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Messaging the Human

Project World supplies when and why to contact a human. This skill supplies transport-neutral mechanics; installing it does not create an approval gate or choose a connector. If policy leaves a material decision ambiguous, identify the missing authority. Do not convert a solvable technical failure into a human gate.

Discover, check, send, inspect

Discover the registered participants and inspect the chosen human:

rig gateway human list --json
rig gateway human show <entityId> --json

Use the returned address (<entityId>@external), not a username, remembered seat, connector handle, or guessed kernel address. Where several humans exist, use the decision ownership in Project World. An absent or ambiguous registration needs a named registration correction, not a fallback address.

Check readiness: configured, enabled, active, ready, reason, and next action. indeterminate is not ready. Follow the reported next inspection; do not enable or reconfigure a connector merely to make the check pass.

Author for the person reading on a phone: a short subject in --summary, then one complete brief in --body-file. State why it matters, your recommendation and material tradeoff, the bounded action if approved, and the choice requested. For an update, state the user-visible outcome and “No action needed.” Aim for roughly 100–150 words; this is guidance, not a semantic validator. Keep technical continuation, exact candidate/revision and evidence on the owning agent row and in the durable artifact behind --evidence-ref. A local path is not a phone link and Markdown evidence files are not automatically attached.

For example, a synthetic brief could say:

The repaired status view is ready. I recommend updating this instance; live status will briefly pause. Sessions will be preserved. Approve this instance update, or hold? Supporting test detail follows in this thread.

This example grants no authority. Choose --human-intent decision for a request or --human-intent update for a quiet FYI. Omission retains legacy decision behavior; words such as “FYI” and tags do not change intent.

The sole outbound human-message primitive is:

rig queue create --destination <entityId>@external \
  --human-intent decision --summary "<short subject>" --body-file <brief-file> \
  --evidence-ref <durable-evidence> --verify --json

An optional --human-detail-file <path> supplies one coherent supplemental reply in the same thread. Announce its purpose in the brief; the product also marks that a detail reply follows. The primary must already contain the complete scope, options and action. Do not split an agent dump blindly or move the essential choice into overflow. Rendering checks every part and its accessibility fallback before posting; an oversized request is refused with a field-specific correction, never silently clipped. Shorten the brief or related detail as directed. Inspect the failed row, then deliberately cancel/replace the authored request if its content needs correction; a timeout alone is never a reason to replace it.

If an existing agent-owned row must wait for a decision, block it on the new live qitem ID (rig queue block <work-id> --on <human-qitem-id> ...), not on the human address. Completion of the human qitem resumes its dependants. Blocking on the human as well would issue another notification for the same decision.

The row persists before bounded delivery verification. Read its qitem ID and verification result; posted proves connector posting, not human readership. transport-failed, never-posted, or a pending/indeterminate result leaves the row intact. Inspect that same row and its next action; never create a second row or blindly resend because verification timed out.

rig queue transitions <qitem-id>

For update, confirmed complete delivery may close the delivery obligation. It creates no approval obligation and cannot be used as a decision blocker. Delivered updates remain queryable for Feed; a failure or ambiguous send stays separate. A root message alone does not prove supplemental delivery. Retries reconcile stable part identities and send only missing parts. An FYI reply is not a human decision.

For a decision, a correlated reply binds to that exact human and qitem and records the resolution that resumes the owner. Check the recorded result before claiming the decision arrived; a delivery receipt alone is not acceptance.

Existing blockers and other channels

An existing agent-owned row may be blocked on <entityId>@host. That is an internal custody label resolved through the human registry to the same external participant; it is not a second delivery address. Keep the owner and continuation on that row. Inspect its existing delivery receipt before considering another request, so a legacy blocker does not produce a duplicate message. Never derive @host from the current rig name.

rig send reaches an agent's terminal only. It is not a human transport or a durable human obligation. Agent-to-agent work uses the queue handoff path. Connector-specific configuration and handles belong to registry/readiness tools, not to project-independent message instructions.

Files (openrig)
  • SKILL.md 5.6 KB
    ---
    name: messaging-the-human
    description: "Use when project policy calls for a human decision or update, a human delivery is pending or failed, or a reply must resume the right work."
    metadata:
      cli_surfaces_referenced:
        - gateway human list
        - gateway human show
        - queue create
        - queue transitions
        - queue block
        - send
      openrig:
        stage: provisional
        audience: all agents
        sibling_skills:
          - queue-handoff
          - openrig-user
    ---
    
    # Messaging the Human
    
    Project World supplies **when and why** to contact a human. This skill supplies
    transport-neutral mechanics; installing it does not create an approval gate or
    choose a connector. If policy leaves a material decision ambiguous, identify the
    missing authority. Do not convert a solvable technical failure into a human gate.
    
    ## Discover, check, send, inspect
    
    Discover the registered participants and inspect the chosen human:
    
    ```bash
    rig gateway human list --json
    rig gateway human show <entityId> --json
    ```
    
    Use the returned `address` (`<entityId>@external`), not a username, remembered
    seat, connector handle, or guessed kernel address. Where several humans exist,
    use the decision ownership in Project World. An absent or ambiguous registration
    needs a named registration correction, not a fallback address.
    
    Check readiness: configured, enabled, active, ready, reason, and next action.
    `indeterminate` is not ready. Follow the reported next inspection; do not enable
    or reconfigure a connector merely to make the check pass.
    
    Author for the person reading on a phone: a short subject in `--summary`, then
    one complete brief in `--body-file`. State why it matters, your recommendation
    and material tradeoff, the bounded action if approved, and the choice requested.
    For an update, state the user-visible outcome and “No action needed.” Aim for
    roughly 100–150 words; this is guidance, not a semantic validator. Keep technical
    continuation, exact candidate/revision and evidence on the owning agent row and
    in the durable artifact behind `--evidence-ref`. A local path is not a phone link
    and Markdown evidence files are not automatically attached.
    
    For example, a synthetic brief could say:
    
    > The repaired status view is ready. I recommend updating this instance; live
    > status will briefly pause. Sessions will be preserved. Approve this instance
    > update, or hold? Supporting test detail follows in this thread.
    
    This example grants no authority. Choose `--human-intent decision` for a request
    or `--human-intent update` for a quiet FYI. Omission retains legacy decision
    behavior; words such as “FYI” and tags do not change intent.
    
    The sole outbound human-message primitive is:
    
    ```bash
    rig queue create --destination <entityId>@external \
      --human-intent decision --summary "<short subject>" --body-file <brief-file> \
      --evidence-ref <durable-evidence> --verify --json
    ```
    
    An optional `--human-detail-file <path>` supplies one coherent supplemental
    reply in the same thread. Announce its purpose in the brief; the product also
    marks that a detail reply follows. The primary must already contain the complete
    scope, options and action. Do not split an agent dump blindly or move the essential
    choice into overflow. Rendering checks every part and its accessibility fallback
    before posting; an oversized request is refused with a field-specific correction,
    never silently clipped. Shorten the brief or related detail as directed. Inspect
    the failed row, then deliberately cancel/replace the authored request if its
    content needs correction; a timeout alone is never a reason to replace it.
    
    If an existing agent-owned row must wait for a **decision**, block it on the **new live qitem ID**
    (`rig queue block <work-id> --on <human-qitem-id> ...`), not on the human address.
    Completion of the human qitem resumes its dependants. Blocking on the human as
    well would issue another notification for the same decision.
    
    The row persists before bounded delivery verification. Read its qitem ID and
    verification result; `posted` proves connector posting, **not human readership**.
    `transport-failed`, `never-posted`, or a pending/indeterminate result leaves the
    row intact. Inspect that same row and its next action; never create a second row
    or blindly resend because verification timed out.
    
    ```bash
    rig queue transitions <qitem-id>
    ```
    
    For `update`, confirmed complete delivery may close the delivery obligation.
    It creates no approval obligation and cannot be used as a decision blocker.
    Delivered updates remain queryable for Feed; a failure or ambiguous send stays
    separate. A root message alone does not prove supplemental delivery. Retries
    reconcile stable part identities and send only missing parts. An FYI reply is
    not a human decision.
    
    For a decision, a correlated reply binds to that exact human and qitem and records the resolution
    that resumes the owner. Check the recorded result before claiming the decision
    arrived; a delivery receipt alone is not acceptance.
    
    ## Existing blockers and other channels
    
    An existing agent-owned row may be blocked on `<entityId>@host`. That is an
    internal custody label resolved through the human registry to the same external
    participant; it is not a second delivery address. Keep the owner and continuation
    on that row. Inspect its existing delivery receipt before considering another
    request, so a legacy blocker does not produce a duplicate message. Never derive
    `@host` from the current rig name.
    
    `rig send` reaches an agent's terminal only. It is not a human transport or a
    durable human obligation. Agent-to-agent work uses the queue handoff path.
    Connector-specific configuration and handles belong to registry/readiness tools,
    not to project-independent message instructions.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related