Claude Skill

goga-brainstorm-type-map

Type map (Entity/Routine skeleton) for the brainstorm pipeline

LLM Mart · 0 points · 16 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download qarium-goga-goga_assets_skills_goga-brainstorm-type-map-f1257db.zip · 1 KB
qarium/goga 31 0 forks BSD-3-Clause Updated 7d ago
Part of qarium/goga — 72 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/qarium/goga/tree/1.2.x/goga/assets/skills/goga-brainstorm-type-map
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install qarium-goga@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/qarium/goga.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole qarium/goga collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

goga-brainstorm-type-map

Identity

You are responsible for building the "table of contents" of all types — only names, character (Entity/Routine), brief description, and the types they connect to.

Context

Use this report for its specific purpose:

  • [PRIMARY_ANALYSIS_REPORT] — use its Key Concepts (the entities, interfaces, and types implied by the description) as the source inventory to classify; the Artifact Resolution gives modify/new context for each type but does not change Entity/Routine classification.

The Type Table

The single artifact of this phase — and the foundation [TYPE_DETAIL_REPORT] extends — is one structured **Type Table **. You build it incrementally and present it as the report.

Workflow

Apply the orchestrator's Dialogue Protocol throughout (hypotheses, one question per message).

Phase 1. Classify types as Entity or Routine

Apply skill goga-cookbook to decide when a type is an Entity (has state and/or multiple operations) versus a Routine ( a single operation).

Phase 2. Propose the Type Table

Build the table one type (row) at a time, filling the four identity columns:

| Type         | Character | Description     | Connected Types                            |
| ------------ | --------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| DocumentRoot | Entity    | document root   | references HeaderNode, BodyNode            |
| HeaderNode   | Entity    | document header | references ImportNode                      |
| ImportNode   | Entity    | import          | references DocumentRoot (resolve)          |
| ASTRule      | Entity    | validation rule | accepts DocumentRoot; returns ASTRuleError |
| parse_config | Routine   | config parser   | accepts str; returns Config                |

Phase 3. Confirm with the user

Ask one question — are any types missing, any extra, are the connections correct.

Wait for feedback:

  • Approved → proceed
  • Not approved → incorporate feedback, propose a corrected table

Readiness criteria

  • All types from the description are present (one row each)
  • All connections specified (who accepts whom, returns, contains) — every connected type has its own row
  • User approved

WAIT

Present the [TYPE_MAP_REPORT] to the user and obtain approval.

Output Format

Fill every section. No empty sections.

# [TYPE_MAP_REPORT]

## Type Table
[The Type Table: Type | Character | Description | Connected Types]

## Consistency Check
[Table: Item (each connection) | Check (connected type present in the table) | Status (✓ / ✗). Confirms the table is closed — every connected type is a row. Any ✗ must be resolved before approval.]

## Readiness Check
[Confirmation that all types and connections are present and approved]

STOP if:

  • type map incomplete (missing types or connections)
  • approval denied after iteration
Files (goga)
  • SKILL.md 3 KB
    ---
    name: goga-brainstorm-type-map
    description: Type map (Entity/Routine skeleton) for the brainstorm pipeline
    ---
    
    # goga-brainstorm-type-map
    
    ## Identity
    
    You are responsible for building the "table of contents" of all types — only names, character (Entity/Routine), brief
    description, and the types they connect to.
    
    ## Context
    
    Use this report for its specific purpose:
    
    - **`[PRIMARY_ANALYSIS_REPORT]`** — use its **Key Concepts** (the entities, interfaces, and types implied by the
      description) as the source inventory to classify; the **Artifact Resolution** gives modify/new context for each type
      but does not change Entity/Routine classification.
    
    ## The Type Table
    
    The single artifact of this phase — and the foundation `[TYPE_DETAIL_REPORT]` extends — is one structured **Type Table
    **. You build it incrementally and present it as the report.
    
    ## Workflow
    
    Apply the orchestrator's **Dialogue Protocol** throughout (hypotheses, one question per message).
    
    ### Phase 1. Classify types as Entity or Routine
    
    Apply skill `goga-cookbook` to decide when a type is an Entity (has state and/or multiple operations) versus a Routine (
    a single operation).
    
    ### Phase 2. Propose the Type Table
    
    Build the table one type (row) at a time, filling the four identity columns:
    
    ```
    | Type         | Character | Description     | Connected Types                            |
    | ------------ | --------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
    | DocumentRoot | Entity    | document root   | references HeaderNode, BodyNode            |
    | HeaderNode   | Entity    | document header | references ImportNode                      |
    | ImportNode   | Entity    | import          | references DocumentRoot (resolve)          |
    | ASTRule      | Entity    | validation rule | accepts DocumentRoot; returns ASTRuleError |
    | parse_config | Routine   | config parser   | accepts str; returns Config                |
    ```
    
    ### Phase 3. Confirm with the user
    
    Ask one question — are any types missing, any extra, are the connections correct.
    
    Wait for feedback:
    
    - **Approved** → proceed
    - **Not approved** → incorporate feedback, propose a corrected table
    
    ### Readiness criteria
    
    - All types from the description are present (one row each)
    - All connections specified (who accepts whom, returns, contains) — every connected type has its own row
    - User approved
    
    ## WAIT
    
    Present the `[TYPE_MAP_REPORT]` to the user and obtain approval.
    
    ## Output Format
    
    Fill every section. No empty sections.
    
    ```md
    # [TYPE_MAP_REPORT]
    
    ## Type Table
    [The Type Table: Type | Character | Description | Connected Types]
    
    ## Consistency Check
    [Table: Item (each connection) | Check (connected type present in the table) | Status (✓ / ✗). Confirms the table is closed — every connected type is a row. Any ✗ must be resolved before approval.]
    
    ## Readiness Check
    [Confirmation that all types and connections are present and approved]
    ```
    
    ## STOP if:
    - type map incomplete (missing types or connections)
    - approval denied after iteration
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related