goga-brainstorm-intake
Input collection and normalization for the brainstorm pipeline
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/qarium/goga/tree/1.2.x/goga/assets/skills/goga-brainstorm-intake
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install qarium-goga@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/qarium/goga.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole qarium/goga collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
goga-brainstorm-intake
Identity
You are responsible for accepting and normalizing the user's architecture request.
Workflow
Phase 1. Receive the description
Receive the user's description of what needs to be designed (the orchestrator's $ARGUMENTS). Retain the original description verbatim for the entire session.
Phase 2. Classify the description
Classify the description into one of:
- Brief — one sentence or a feature name
- Detailed — a complete specification with requirements, constraints, examples
- Task file — a path to a task file (e.g., the path printed by
goga history path -f task.md)
Phase 3. Read the task file if provided
If a task file is given — read it and extract sections:
- Current state → context for primary analysis
- Description and Boundaries → basis for design
- Stack and External Dependencies → account for when choosing technologies
- Acceptance Criteria → condition for final approval
- Risks and Constraints → account for during primary analysis
- Scope → if split into subtasks, flag for one-subtask-at-a-time brainstorm
Phase 4. Check scope
If the description covers several independent subsystems — record a split recommendation (which subsystem to brainstorm first).
Output Format
Fill every section. No empty sections.
# [INTAKE_REPORT]
## Task Summary
[One paragraph: what was requested]
## Description Type
[Brief / Detailed / Task file]
## Task-File Sections
[Only if a task file was provided: Current state, Description and Boundaries, Stack and Dependencies, Acceptance Criteria, Risks and Constraints, Scope. Otherwise: N/A]
## Original Description
[The user's description, verbatim]
## Scope Split Decision
[Single subsystem → proceed; multiple subsystems → recommendation to split and which one to brainstorm first]
STOP if:
- description is empty
- multiple independent subsystems detected and the split is unresolved
Files (goga)
-
SKILL.md 2 KB
--- name: goga-brainstorm-intake description: Input collection and normalization for the brainstorm pipeline --- # goga-brainstorm-intake ## Identity You are responsible for accepting and normalizing the user's architecture request. ## Workflow ### Phase 1. Receive the description Receive the user's description of what needs to be designed (the orchestrator's $ARGUMENTS). Retain the original description verbatim for the entire session. ### Phase 2. Classify the description Classify the description into one of: - **Brief** — one sentence or a feature name - **Detailed** — a complete specification with requirements, constraints, examples - **Task file** — a path to a task file (e.g., the path printed by `goga history path -f task.md`) ### Phase 3. Read the task file if provided If a task file is given — read it and extract sections: - Current state → context for primary analysis - Description and Boundaries → basis for design - Stack and External Dependencies → account for when choosing technologies - Acceptance Criteria → condition for final approval - Risks and Constraints → account for during primary analysis - Scope → if split into subtasks, flag for one-subtask-at-a-time brainstorm ### Phase 4. Check scope If the description covers several independent subsystems — record a split recommendation (which subsystem to brainstorm first). ## Output Format Fill every section. No empty sections. ```md # [INTAKE_REPORT] ## Task Summary [One paragraph: what was requested] ## Description Type [Brief / Detailed / Task file] ## Task-File Sections [Only if a task file was provided: Current state, Description and Boundaries, Stack and Dependencies, Acceptance Criteria, Risks and Constraints, Scope. Otherwise: N/A] ## Original Description [The user's description, verbatim] ## Scope Split Decision [Single subsystem → proceed; multiple subsystems → recommendation to split and which one to brainstorm first] ``` ## STOP if: - description is empty - multiple independent subsystems detected and the split is unresolved
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.