Claude Skill

dotnet-mcaf-agile-delivery

Apply MCAF agile-delivery guidance for backlog quality, roles, ceremonies, and engineering feedback. Use when defining how the team plans, tracks work, and turns feedback into durable improvements.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download postpartum-genushyacinthus29-dotnet-skills-skills_dotnet-mcaf-agile-delivery-bfa4ebd.zip · 3 KB
Part of postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills — 80 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/tree/main/skills/dotnet-mcaf-agile-delivery
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install postpartum-genushyacinthus29-dotnet-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

MCAF: Agile Delivery

Trigger On

  • the team needs backlog, ceremony, role, or feedback-loop rules
  • delivery process is vague, too heavy, or living only in chat
  • recurring team pain needs to become durable repo guidance

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • repo governance that belongs in AGENTS.md
  • feature planning for one specific feature doc

Inputs

  • the current delivery pain point
  • backlog, role, ceremony, and feedback mechanisms that already exist
  • where the team stores durable agreements, if anywhere

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Keep delivery artefacts concrete:
    • backlog
    • roles
    • ceremonies
    • engineering feedback
  2. Prefer lightweight agreements over process theatre.
  3. When a pain point repeats, turn it into a rule, doc, or skill update.
  4. Pull only the references that match the current process problem.

Deliver

  • concrete delivery guidance
  • durable team agreements
  • feedback loops that update docs, skills, and rules

Validate

  • the process guidance fixes a real delivery problem
  • roles and rituals are explicit enough to use
  • recurring pain is converted into a durable artifact, not more chat

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Brainstorm first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define the problem, target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • generate options and think through trade-offs before committing
    • capture the recommended direction and open questions
  2. Plan second (mandatory):
    • write a detailed execution plan from the chosen direction
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  3. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  4. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  5. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  6. Update the plan after each iteration.
  7. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  8. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • read references/agile-delivery.md first
  • open references/roles.md only for a narrower topic

Example Requests

  • "Define a lighter delivery model for this team."
  • "Turn repeated feedback pain into repo guidance."
  • "Fix our backlog and ceremony chaos."
Files (dotnet-skills)
  • references
    • agile-delivery.md 1.3 KB
      # Agile Delivery
      
      Agile delivery in MCAF is lightweight and outcome-driven.
      
      ## Goals
      
      - keep the backlog visible and current
      - turn work into small reviewable increments
      - keep feedback loops short
      - convert repeated process pain into durable repo guidance
      
      ## Default Operating Model
      
      - Maintain one shared backlog that the whole delivery team can see.
      - Keep work items small enough to review, test, and ship without hidden side work.
      - Define readiness before implementation and completion before closure.
      - Use short planning and feedback loops instead of large ceremony-heavy process.
      - Record lasting process rules in the repo, not only in chat or meetings.
      
      ## Backlog Rules
      
      - backlog items describe a user or system outcome, not just a task label
      - scope, acceptance, and constraints are visible before implementation starts
      - if an item is too large to review coherently, split it before coding
      
      ## Team Cadence
      
      - planning chooses the next smallest meaningful slice of value
      - standups or async updates surface blockers and PR review needs
      - retrospectives or equivalent feedback loops must produce concrete follow-up actions
      
      ## Durable Artifacts
      
      - work agreements and recurring rules belong in docs or `AGENTS.md`
      - feature behaviour belongs in feature specs
      - architecture decisions belong in ADRs
      - repo workflow rules belong in skills only when they are reusable
      
    • roles.md 631 B
      # Agile/Scrum Roles
      
      - We prefer using "process lead" over "scrum master". It describes the same role.
      
      This section has links directing you to definitions for the traditional roles within Agile/Scrum.  After reading through the best practices you should have a basic understanding of the key Agile roles in terms of what they are and the expectations for the role.
      
      - [Product Owner](https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#product-owner 'Product Owner')
      - [Scrum Master](https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#scrum-master 'Scrum Master')
      - [Development Team](https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#developers 'Developers')
      
  • SKILL.md 3.7 KB
    ---
    name: dotnet-mcaf-agile-delivery
    version: "1.0.0"
    category: "Core"
    description: "Apply MCAF agile-delivery guidance for backlog quality, roles, ceremonies, and engineering feedback. Use when defining how the team plans, tracks work, and turns feedback into durable improvements."
    compatibility: "Requires repository access only when the repo stores delivery docs or governance guidance."
    ---
    
    # MCAF: Agile Delivery
    
    ## Trigger On
    
    - the team needs backlog, ceremony, role, or feedback-loop rules
    - delivery process is vague, too heavy, or living only in chat
    - recurring team pain needs to become durable repo guidance
    
    ## Value
    
    - produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
    - reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
    - leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
    
    ## Do Not Use For
    
    - repo governance that belongs in `AGENTS.md`
    - feature planning for one specific feature doc
    
    ## Inputs
    
    - the current delivery pain point
    - backlog, role, ceremony, and feedback mechanisms that already exist
    - where the team stores durable agreements, if anywhere
    
    ## Quick Start
    
    1. Read the nearest `AGENTS.md` and confirm scope and constraints.
    2. Run this skill's `Workflow` through the `Ralph Loop` until outcomes are acceptable.
    3. Return the `Required Result Format` with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
    
    ## Workflow
    
    1. Keep delivery artefacts concrete:
       - backlog
       - roles
       - ceremonies
       - engineering feedback
    2. Prefer lightweight agreements over process theatre.
    3. When a pain point repeats, turn it into a rule, doc, or skill update.
    4. Pull only the references that match the current process problem.
    
    ## Deliver
    
    - concrete delivery guidance
    - durable team agreements
    - feedback loops that update docs, skills, and rules
    
    ## Validate
    
    - the process guidance fixes a real delivery problem
    - roles and rituals are explicit enough to use
    - recurring pain is converted into a durable artifact, not more chat
    
    ## Ralph Loop
    
    Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
    
    1. Brainstorm first (mandatory):
       - analyze current state
       - define the problem, target outcome, constraints, and risks
       - generate options and think through trade-offs before committing
       - capture the recommended direction and open questions
    2. Plan second (mandatory):
       - write a detailed execution plan from the chosen direction
       - list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
    3. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
    4. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
    5. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
    6. Update the plan after each iteration.
    7. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
    8. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return `status: not_applicable` with explicit reason and fallback path.
    
    ### Required Result Format
    
    - `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked`
    - `plan`: concise plan and current iteration step
    - `actions_taken`: concrete changes made
    - `validation_skills`: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
    - `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
    - `remaining`: top unresolved items or `none`
    
    For setup-only requests with no execution, return `status: configured` and exact next commands.
    
    ## Load References
    
    - read `references/agile-delivery.md` first
    - open `references/roles.md` only for a narrower topic
    
    ## Example Requests
    
    - "Define a lighter delivery model for this team."
    - "Turn repeated feedback pain into repo guidance."
    - "Fix our backlog and ceremony chaos."
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related