dotnet-code-analysis
Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. Use when a .NET repo needs first-party code analysis, `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, or warning-as-error policy wired into build and CI.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills/tree/main/skills/dotnet-code-analysis
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install postpartum-genushyacinthus29-dotnet-skills@llmmart
git clone https://github.com/Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
.NET Code Analysis
Trigger On
- the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
- CI should fail on analyzer warnings
- the team needs
AnalysisLevelorAnalysisModeguidance - the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy
Do Not Use For
- third-party analyzer selection by itself
- formatting-only work
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - project files or
Directory.Build.props - current analyzer severity policy
Hard Rules for AI Agents
Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.
- Never disable or remove
TreatWarningsAsErrorsorWarningsAsErrorsif the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set tofalse, wrap in a condition, or add<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>to make the build pass. - Never add
<NoWarn>or#pragma warning disablefor warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression. - Never silently downgrade severity in
.editorconfig(e.g.errortowarningornone) to make a build succeed. - If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
- If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.
Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
I --> J{More batches?}
J -->|Yes| G
J -->|No| F
C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
F --> K
K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]
- Start with SDK analyzers before third-party packages.
- Detect project maturity: new or existing/legacy.
- Enable
EnableNETAnalyzers,AnalysisLevel,AnalysisModeinDirectory.Build.props. - Apply the right warning promotion strategy (see below).
- Per-rule severity goes in repo-root
.editorconfig. dotnet buildis the analyzer gate in CI.
Warning Promotion Strategy
New Projects
Set these in Directory.Build.props immediately:
TreatWarningsAsErrors= trueAnalysisLevel= latest-recommended- Security category = error in
.editorconfig
Fix all warnings before merging.
Legacy Projects — Gradual Promotion
Blanket TreatWarningsAsErrors on a legacy codebase produces hundreds/thousands of errors. An agent cannot fix them all at once — context floods, fix quality drops. Promote in batches.
Phase 1: Trivial Hygiene (start here)
Mechanical fixes, lowest effort:
- CS8019 — unnecessary using directive (remove it)
- CS0219 — variable assigned but never used (remove it)
- CS0168 — variable declared but never used (remove it)
- CS1591 — missing XML comment for public member (add comment or disable for internal code)
- CS0612 — obsolete member used, no message (replace with non-obsolete API)
- CS0618 — obsolete member used, with message (follow migration guidance)
Add to WarningsAsErrors: CS8019;CS0219;CS0168. Fix all, then Phase 2.
Phase 2: Code Quality (ask user which categories)
- CA2000 — dispose objects before losing scope (Reliability)
- CA1062 — validate public method arguments (Design)
- CA1822 — mark members as static (Performance)
- CA1860 — avoid Enumerable.Any() for length check (Performance)
- CA1861 — avoid constant arrays as arguments (Performance)
- CA2007 — consider calling ConfigureAwait (Reliability)
- CS8600–CS8610 — nullable reference type warnings (Nullability)
Ask: "Which categories next — Nullability, Performance, or Reliability?" Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors, fix, repeat.
Phase 3: Security (always promote early)
Set in .editorconfig regardless of project maturity:
[*.cs]
dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error
Covers CA3001 (SQL injection), CA3002 (XSS), CA3003 (path injection), CA3075 (insecure DTD), CA5350/CA5351 (weak crypto), CA5394 (insecure randomness).
Phase 4: Full Coverage
Once all batches pass, transition to:
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<WarningsNotAsErrors>CA1707</WarningsNotAsErrors> <!-- explicit exceptions only -->
Interaction Protocol (legacy codebases)
- Run
dotnet build, count warnings by ID. - Report summary: "Found 47 CS8019, 23 CA1822, 12 CA2000, 8 CS8600."
- Ask which batch to tackle. Recommend starting with Phase 1.
- Fix selected batch, verify build.
- Add those IDs to
WarningsAsErrors. - Report back, ask about next batch.
Never skip the ask step. The user decides the pace.
Bootstrap When Missing
- Detect current state:
dotnet --inforg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode|TreatWarningsAsErrors|WarningsAsErrors" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT 2>&1— count warnings by ID
- Classify: new (few/zero warnings) vs legacy (many warnings).
- Enable
EnableNETAnalyzers,AnalysisLevel,AnalysisModein MSBuild config. - Apply promotion strategy matching project maturity.
- Per-rule severity in repo-root
.editorconfig. - Run
dotnet build, returnstatus: configuredorstatus: improved. - If repo defers analyzer policy to another build layer, return
status: not_applicable.
Deliver
- explicit, reviewable first-party analyzer policy
- build-time analyzer execution for CI
- warning promotion plan matching project maturity
Validate
- analyzer behavior driven by repo config, not IDE defaults
- CI reproduces same warnings/errors locally
- no
TreatWarningsAsErrors,WarningsAsErrors, or severity settings removed/weakened without user approval - promoted warnings produce build errors, not just IDE hints
Ralph Loop
- Plan: analyze state, define target, constraints, risks, execution plan, validation steps.
- Execute one step, produce concrete delta.
- Review result, capture findings.
- Apply fixes in small batches, rerun checks.
- Update plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
- Missing dependency: bootstrap or return
status: not_applicable.
Required Result Format
status:complete|clean|improved|configured|not_applicable|blockedplan: concise plan and current stepactions_taken: concrete changesvalidation_skills: final skills run or skipped with reasonsverification: commands, checks, or review evidenceremaining: unresolved items ornone
Load References
references/rules.mdreferences/config.mdreferences/code-analysis.md
Example Requests
- "Turn on built-in .NET analyzers."
- "Make analyzer warnings fail the build."
- "Set the right AnalysisLevel for this repo."
- "Start treating unused usings and unused variables as errors."
- "Help me gradually promote Roslyn warnings in my legacy project."
- "Which warnings should I promote to errors next?"
Files (dotnet-skills)
-
references
-
code-analysis.md 1.3 KB
# .NET SDK Code Analysis ## Open/Free Status - first-party .NET SDK analyzers - free to use - included with the modern .NET SDK ## Install For projects targeting .NET 5 or later, built-in analyzers are included with the SDK and code analysis is enabled by default. For older or explicitly controlled projects, set analyzer properties in the project or `Directory.Build.props`: ```xml <PropertyGroup> <EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers> <AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel> </PropertyGroup> ``` ## Verify First Before adding anything, check whether the repo already set analyzer policy: ```bash rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode|TreatWarningsAsErrors" -g 'Directory.Build.*' -g '*.csproj' . ``` ## Common Commands ```bash dotnet build MySolution.sln dotnet build MySolution.sln -warnaserror ``` ## CI Fit - use `dotnet build` as the analyzer gate - keep `AnalysisLevel` explicit in MSBuild - keep rule severity in the repo-root `.editorconfig` ## When Not To Use - when you only need a formatter - when the repo specifically needs a framework or third-party analyzer set beyond the built-in SDK rules ## Sources - [Overview of .NET source code analysis](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/overview) -
config.md 4.7 KB
# MSBuild Properties and .editorconfig for Code Analysis ## MSBuild Properties Set in `Directory.Build.props` or project files. ### EnableNETAnalyzers ```xml <EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers> ``` Default true in .NET 5+. Set explicitly to prevent accidental disabling. ### AnalysisLevel Values: `5.0`–`10.0` (specific SDK), `latest`, `latest-recommended`, `latest-minimum`, `latest-all`, `preview`. Combined syntax includes mode: `<AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel>` equals `latest` + `Recommended` mode. ### AnalysisMode Values: `None` (all off), `Default`, `Minimum` (critical only), `Recommended` (start here), `All`. ### Category-Specific AnalysisMode ```xml <AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel> <AnalysisModeSecurity>All</AnalysisModeSecurity> <AnalysisModeReliability>All</AnalysisModeReliability> ``` Categories: Design, Documentation, Globalization, Interoperability, Maintainability, Naming, Performance, Reliability, Security, Usage. ### TreatWarningsAsErrors ```xml <TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors> ``` All warnings fail the build. Use for new projects or clean codebases. Agent rule: never disable to make a build pass. ### WarningsAsErrors (selective — preferred for legacy) ```xml <WarningsAsErrors>CS8019;CS0219;CS0168;CA2000;CA3001</WarningsAsErrors> ``` Promote specific IDs to errors. Preferred for gradual adoption: add IDs as you fix each batch. Agent rule: never remove IDs from this list to make a build pass. ### WarningsNotAsErrors ```xml <TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors> <WarningsNotAsErrors>CA1707</WarningsNotAsErrors> ``` Explicit exceptions when using TreatWarningsAsErrors. ### NoWarn ```xml <NoWarn>$(NoWarn);CA1062</NoWarn> ``` Disables warnings entirely. Use sparingly; prefer .editorconfig for visibility. ### EnforceCodeStyleInBuild ```xml <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild> ``` Enables IDE code style rules during build (off by default for performance). ## .editorconfig Place at repo root. Rules cascade to subdirectories. ### Severity per rule ```editorconfig [*.cs] dotnet_diagnostic.CA2000.severity = error dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none ``` ### Severity per category (.NET 6+) ```editorconfig [*.cs] dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Performance.severity = warning ``` ### Scope patterns ```editorconfig [**/Tests/**/*.cs] dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = none [*.generated.cs] generated_code = true ``` ### Code Style Settings ```editorconfig [*.cs] csharp_style_namespace_declarations = file_scoped:suggestion csharp_style_expression_bodied_methods = when_on_single_line:suggestion csharp_style_expression_bodied_properties = true:suggestion csharp_style_pattern_matching_over_as_with_null_check = true:warning csharp_style_pattern_matching_over_is_with_cast_check = true:warning csharp_style_prefer_null_check_over_type_check = true:suggestion csharp_style_var_for_built_in_types = true:suggestion csharp_style_var_when_type_is_apparent = true:suggestion csharp_style_var_elsewhere = true:suggestion ``` ### Formatting Settings ```editorconfig [*.cs] indent_style = space indent_size = 4 tab_width = 4 csharp_new_line_before_open_brace = all csharp_new_line_before_else = true csharp_new_line_before_catch = true csharp_new_line_before_finally = true ``` ## Recommended Starting Configuration ### Directory.Build.props ```xml <Project> <PropertyGroup> <EnableNETAnalyzers>true</EnableNETAnalyzers> <AnalysisLevel>latest-recommended</AnalysisLevel> <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild> </PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(Configuration)' == 'Release'"> <TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors> </PropertyGroup> </Project> ``` ### .editorconfig (root) ```editorconfig root = true [*] indent_style = space indent_size = 4 end_of_line = lf charset = utf-8 trim_trailing_whitespace = true insert_final_newline = true [*.cs] dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Reliability.severity = warning [**/Tests/**/*.cs] dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = none ``` ## Verification ```bash dotnet build dotnet build /p:ReportAnalyzer=true ``` ## References - [AnalysisLevel](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/project-sdk/msbuild-props#analysislevel) - [Configuration options](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/configuration-options) - [EditorConfig](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/configuration-files) - [Suppress warnings](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/suppress-warnings) -
rules.md 4.9 KB
# SDK Analyzer Rule Categories This reference covers the built-in .NET SDK analyzer rule categories, their prefixes, and practical guidance for each. ## Rule Prefix Summary | Prefix | Category | Scope | |--------|----------|-------| | CA | Code Analysis | Design, reliability, security, performance, usage | | IDE | IDE Analyzers | Code style, simplification, formatting | | CS | C# Compiler Warnings | Language-level warnings promoted by analyzers | ## CA Rules: Code Analysis CA rules are the primary SDK analyzer rules. They cover correctness, performance, and security. ### CA1xxx: Design Rules - Ensure proper API design and naming. - Examples: CA1000 (do not declare static members on generic types), CA1010 (collections should implement generic interface). - High value for public APIs. ### CA2xxx: Usage and Reliability - Detect misuse of framework types and patterns. - Examples: CA2000 (dispose objects before losing scope), CA2007 (consider calling ConfigureAwait). - Enable these early; they catch real bugs. ### CA3xxx: Security - Identify security vulnerabilities. - Examples: CA3001 (SQL injection), CA3075 (insecure DTD processing). - Critical for any user-facing or network-connected code. ### CA5xxx: Security (Extended) - Extended security rules for cryptography, serialization, and input handling. - Examples: CA5350 (do not use weak cryptographic algorithms), CA5394 (do not use insecure randomness). - Enable for production systems handling sensitive data. ### CA18xx, CA19xx: Performance - Detect performance anti-patterns. - Examples: CA1802 (use literals where appropriate), CA1860 (avoid Length/Count zero checks). - High value for hot paths and resource-constrained environments. ## IDE Rules: Code Style IDE rules enforce consistency and simplify code. ### IDE0001-IDE0099: Code Simplification - Remove unnecessary code, simplify expressions. - Examples: IDE0001 (simplify name), IDE0017 (use object initializers). - Useful for codebase consistency. ### IDE0100-IDE0199: Language Feature Preferences - Prefer modern C# features. - Examples: IDE0160 (file-scoped namespace preference), IDE0161 (convert to block-scoped namespace). - Align with team style guide. ### IDE0200-IDE0299: Expression Preferences - Expression-bodied members, pattern matching, null checks. - Examples: IDE0200 (unnecessary lambda expression), IDE0270 (use coalesce expression). - Enforce via .editorconfig for consistency. ### IDE1xxx: Formatting - Whitespace, indentation, newlines. - Examples: IDE1005 (delegate invocation should be conditional). - Typically set to suggestion or silent; enforce in CI only when the team agrees. ## Severity Levels | Severity | Build Behavior | Use Case | |----------|----------------|----------| | error | Fails build | Critical correctness or security | | warning | Logged, may fail with TreatWarningsAsErrors | Important but deferrable | | suggestion | IDE hint only | Style preferences | | silent | Rule runs but no diagnostic | Rule disabled for output but still analyzed | | none | Rule disabled | Not applicable to this codebase | ## Suppression Strategies ### Inline Suppression ```csharp #pragma warning disable CA2000 var resource = new Resource(); #pragma warning restore CA2000 ``` Use sparingly. Always include a justification comment. ### GlobalSuppressions.cs ```csharp [assembly: SuppressMessage("Reliability", "CA2000:Dispose objects before losing scope", Justification = "Ownership transferred to caller", Scope = "member", Target = "~M:MyClass.CreateResource")] ``` Prefer for project-wide suppression of known false positives. ### .editorconfig ```editorconfig # Disable specific rule for all files dotnet_diagnostic.CA1062.severity = none # Disable for test files only [**/Tests/**/*.cs] dotnet_diagnostic.CA1707.severity = none ``` Prefer for category-level or scope-based configuration. ## Rule Selection Guidance 1. Start with `AnalysisMode = Recommended` to get the common high-value rules. 2. Promote security rules (CA3xxx, CA5xxx) to error for production code. 3. Treat CA2xxx reliability rules as warnings initially; promote to error as the codebase matures. 4. Enforce IDE rules only when the team has agreed on style conventions. 5. Do not enable all rules at maximum severity immediately; ramp up over time. ## Discovering Available Rules ```bash # List all analyzer diagnostics from a build dotnet build /p:ReportAnalyzer=true /v:d | grep "CA\|IDE" # Get rule documentation # https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ # https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/ ``` ## References - [Code quality rules](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/) - [Code style rules](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/style-rules/) - [Configure analyzers](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/configuration-files)
-
-
SKILL.md 7.6 KB
--- name: dotnet-code-analysis version: "1.0.1" category: "Code Quality" description: "Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. Use when a .NET repo needs first-party code analysis, `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, or warning-as-error policy wired into build and CI." compatibility: "Requires a .NET SDK-based repository; respects the repo's `AGENTS.md` commands first." --- # .NET Code Analysis ## Trigger On - the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers - CI should fail on analyzer warnings - the team needs `AnalysisLevel` or `AnalysisMode` guidance - the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy ## Do Not Use For - third-party analyzer selection by itself - formatting-only work ## Inputs - the nearest `AGENTS.md` - project files or `Directory.Build.props` - current analyzer severity policy ## Hard Rules for AI Agents Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent. 1. Never disable or remove `TreatWarningsAsErrors` or `WarningsAsErrors` if the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set to `false`, wrap in a condition, or add `<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>` to make the build pass. 2. Never add `<NoWarn>` or `#pragma warning disable` for warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression. 3. Never silently downgrade severity in `.editorconfig` (e.g. `error` to `warning` or `none`) to make a build succeed. 4. If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID. 5. If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy. ## Workflow ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?} B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately] B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID] D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"} E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors] E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first] G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors] H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build] I --> J{More batches?} J -->|Yes| G J -->|No| F C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended] F --> K K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig] L --> M[Validate: build + CI green] ``` 1. Start with SDK analyzers before third-party packages. 2. Detect project maturity: new or existing/legacy. 3. Enable `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, `AnalysisMode` in `Directory.Build.props`. 4. Apply the right warning promotion strategy (see below). 5. Per-rule severity goes in repo-root `.editorconfig`. 6. `dotnet build` is the analyzer gate in CI. ## Warning Promotion Strategy ### New Projects Set these in `Directory.Build.props` immediately: - `TreatWarningsAsErrors` = true - `AnalysisLevel` = latest-recommended - Security category = error in `.editorconfig` Fix all warnings before merging. ### Legacy Projects — Gradual Promotion Blanket `TreatWarningsAsErrors` on a legacy codebase produces hundreds/thousands of errors. An agent cannot fix them all at once — context floods, fix quality drops. Promote in batches. #### Phase 1: Trivial Hygiene (start here) Mechanical fixes, lowest effort: - CS8019 — unnecessary using directive (remove it) - CS0219 — variable assigned but never used (remove it) - CS0168 — variable declared but never used (remove it) - CS1591 — missing XML comment for public member (add comment or disable for internal code) - CS0612 — obsolete member used, no message (replace with non-obsolete API) - CS0618 — obsolete member used, with message (follow migration guidance) Add to `WarningsAsErrors`: `CS8019;CS0219;CS0168`. Fix all, then Phase 2. #### Phase 2: Code Quality (ask user which categories) - CA2000 — dispose objects before losing scope (Reliability) - CA1062 — validate public method arguments (Design) - CA1822 — mark members as static (Performance) - CA1860 — avoid Enumerable.Any() for length check (Performance) - CA1861 — avoid constant arrays as arguments (Performance) - CA2007 — consider calling ConfigureAwait (Reliability) - CS8600–CS8610 — nullable reference type warnings (Nullability) Ask: "Which categories next — Nullability, Performance, or Reliability?" Add selected IDs to `WarningsAsErrors`, fix, repeat. #### Phase 3: Security (always promote early) Set in `.editorconfig` regardless of project maturity: ```editorconfig [*.cs] dotnet_analyzer_diagnostic.category-Security.severity = error ``` Covers CA3001 (SQL injection), CA3002 (XSS), CA3003 (path injection), CA3075 (insecure DTD), CA5350/CA5351 (weak crypto), CA5394 (insecure randomness). #### Phase 4: Full Coverage Once all batches pass, transition to: ```xml <TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors> <WarningsNotAsErrors>CA1707</WarningsNotAsErrors> <!-- explicit exceptions only --> ``` ### Interaction Protocol (legacy codebases) 1. Run `dotnet build`, count warnings by ID. 2. Report summary: "Found 47 CS8019, 23 CA1822, 12 CA2000, 8 CS8600." 3. Ask which batch to tackle. Recommend starting with Phase 1. 4. Fix selected batch, verify build. 5. Add those IDs to `WarningsAsErrors`. 6. Report back, ask about next batch. Never skip the ask step. The user decides the pace. ## Bootstrap When Missing 1. Detect current state: - `dotnet --info` - `rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode|TreatWarningsAsErrors|WarningsAsErrors" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' .` - `dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT 2>&1` — count warnings by ID 2. Classify: new (few/zero warnings) vs legacy (many warnings). 3. Enable `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, `AnalysisMode` in MSBuild config. 4. Apply promotion strategy matching project maturity. 5. Per-rule severity in repo-root `.editorconfig`. 6. Run `dotnet build`, return `status: configured` or `status: improved`. 7. If repo defers analyzer policy to another build layer, return `status: not_applicable`. ## Deliver - explicit, reviewable first-party analyzer policy - build-time analyzer execution for CI - warning promotion plan matching project maturity ## Validate - analyzer behavior driven by repo config, not IDE defaults - CI reproduces same warnings/errors locally - no `TreatWarningsAsErrors`, `WarningsAsErrors`, or severity settings removed/weakened without user approval - promoted warnings produce build errors, not just IDE hints ## Ralph Loop 1. Plan: analyze state, define target, constraints, risks, execution plan, validation steps. 2. Execute one step, produce concrete delta. 3. Review result, capture findings. 4. Apply fixes in small batches, rerun checks. 5. Update plan after each iteration. 6. Repeat until acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain. 7. Missing dependency: bootstrap or return `status: not_applicable`. ### Required Result Format - `status`: `complete` | `clean` | `improved` | `configured` | `not_applicable` | `blocked` - `plan`: concise plan and current step - `actions_taken`: concrete changes - `validation_skills`: final skills run or skipped with reasons - `verification`: commands, checks, or review evidence - `remaining`: unresolved items or `none` ## Load References - `references/rules.md` - `references/config.md` - `references/code-analysis.md` ## Example Requests - "Turn on built-in .NET analyzers." - "Make analyzer warnings fail the build." - "Set the right AnalysisLevel for this repo." - "Start treating unused usings and unused variables as errors." - "Help me gradually promote Roslyn warnings in my legacy project." - "Which warnings should I promote to errors next?"
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.