Claude
Skill
design-review
Review or audit a design/UI across 6 weighted dimensions with Nielsen's 10 heuristics and a prioritized findings table. Use when the user wants a design critique, quality score, heuristic evaluation, or audit of an existing screen, page, or product before/after build.
Virus-scanned
Reviewed automatically before listing.
Download
plugin87-ux-ui-agent-skills-.claude_skills_design-review-278e9d9.zip · 0 KB
Install
skills CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/design-review
Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install plugin87-ux-ui-agent-skills@llmmart
Git
git clone https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Skill: Design Review
Run a structured, scored review.
Steps
- Read
workflows/design-review.md(rubric, scoring guide, Nielsen heuristics, process). - Gather context: the screen(s)/flow, target users, platform, constraints.
- Score the 6 dimensions (Visual Hierarchy 20%, Consistency 20%, Accessibility 20%, Usability 20%, Responsiveness 10%, Performance 10%); compute the weighted overall.
- Run the accessibility lens with
accessibility/wcag-checklist.md; usescripts/contrast.pyfor any color-pair doubts. - Check against the anti-slop tells in
taste/design-taste.md(Banned Defaults checklist). - Apply Nielsen's 10 heuristics; flag violations by number.
Output
- The 6-dimension scored table + overall score.
- A prioritized findings table: # · Severity (Critical → Major → Minor → Enhancement) · Finding · Recommendation.
- Concrete, token-referenced fixes.
Files (ux-ui-agent-skills)
-
SKILL.md 1.2 KB
--- name: design-review description: Review or audit a design/UI across 6 weighted dimensions with Nielsen's 10 heuristics and a prioritized findings table. Use when the user wants a design critique, quality score, heuristic evaluation, or audit of an existing screen, page, or product before/after build. invocation: model --- # Skill: Design Review Run a structured, scored review. ## Steps 1. Read `workflows/design-review.md` (rubric, scoring guide, Nielsen heuristics, process). 2. Gather context: the screen(s)/flow, target users, platform, constraints. 3. Score the 6 dimensions (Visual Hierarchy 20%, Consistency 20%, Accessibility 20%, Usability 20%, Responsiveness 10%, Performance 10%); compute the weighted overall. 4. Run the accessibility lens with `accessibility/wcag-checklist.md`; use `scripts/contrast.py` for any color-pair doubts. 5. Check against the anti-slop tells in `taste/design-taste.md` (Banned Defaults checklist). 6. Apply Nielsen's 10 heuristics; flag violations by number. ## Output - The 6-dimension scored table + overall score. - A prioritized findings table: # · Severity (Critical → Major → Minor → Enhancement) · Finding · Recommendation. - Concrete, token-referenced fixes.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.