Claude Cursor GitHub Copilot Skill

create-skill

Scaffolds new agent skills for the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating a new skill, generating SKILL.md files, writing a skill description that the runtime will actually route to, or setting up skill directory structures. Handles frontmatter generation, section templates,

LLM Mart · 0 points · 19 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download dotnet-skills-.agents_skills_create-skill-30b30ef.zip · 4 KB
Part of dotnet/skills — 119 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/dotnet/skills/tree/main/.agents/skills/create-skill
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install dotnet-skills@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/dotnet/skills.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole dotnet/skills collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Create Skill

This skill helps you scaffold new agent skills that conform to the Agent Skills specification and the dotnet/skills repository conventions.

When to Use

  • Creating a new skill from scratch
  • Generating a SKILL.md file with proper frontmatter
  • Setting up the skill directory structure with optional folders
  • Ensuring compliance with agentskills.io specification

When Not to Use

  • Modifying existing skills (edit directly instead)
  • Diagnosing or fixing a skill that fails its evaluation (use improve-skill-quality)
  • Writing the skill's eval.yaml (use create-skill-test)
  • Creating custom agents (use the agents/ directory pattern)

Inputs

Input Required Description
Skill name Yes Lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only (e.g., code-review, ci-triage)
Description Yes What the skill does and when agents should use it (1-1024 chars)
Purpose Yes One paragraph describing the outcome
Workflow steps Recommended Numbered steps the agent should follow

Workflow

Step 1: Validate the skill name

Ensure the name:

  • Contains only lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens
  • Does not start or end with a hyphen
  • Does not contain consecutive hyphens
  • Is between 1-64 characters

Step 2: Write the description — it is the router

The description is the only text the runtime sees when deciding whether to load the skill. A perfect body behind a weak description never runs.

---
name: <skill-name>
description: <what it does>. USE FOR: <symptoms, error codes, artifact names, quoted user requests>. DO NOT USE FOR: <nearby-but-wrong intents, with the skill that owns them>.
---
  • Lead with an action verb and use the user's own words: symptoms, error codes (CS1501, MSTEST0014), artifact names (.testsettings, binlog), and requests phrased as a developer would type them.
  • Partition against sibling skills on the real discriminator, not the topic. "Does the abstraction already exist?" separates two skills; "testing" does not. Add the matching exclusion to both siblings.
  • Claim the ambiguous words that would otherwise route to a sibling. If prompts say "review my tests" and a sibling owns "review", say so explicitly.
  • Check every DO NOT USE FOR clause against the scenarios the skill exists to serve — an exclusion like "already on v3" can lock out the post-upgrade fixes that are the skill's purpose.
  • Budget: 1,024 characters per description, and the whole plugin's rendered skill menu is also budgeted. A helper skill users should never invoke directly can set disable-model-invocation: true to free menu space while staying invocable by name.

Step 3: Write for delta over the baseline model

Every skill is scored head-to-head against the same model with no skill loaded. Content the model already produces unaided is worth zero; content that makes it slower or more hedged is worth less than zero. See improve-skill-quality/references/writing-for-baseline-delta.md for the full evidence.

Do Instead of
Encode the decision the model would otherwise get wrong Restating API signatures it already reproduces
"When A, do B, never C, verify D" tables Lists of plausible alternatives
A concrete output contract (exact command, verdict line, findings table) "Consider…", "you may want to…"
Scale output structure to input size A 12-section dashboard for an 8-test suite
Stop-conditions that prevent over-applying Acting before measuring, rewriting working code
Instructing the agent to discover repo paths Marking discoverable paths as required inputs
Reporting restore/build/test failures truthfully Claiming success after a failed command
Verifying load-bearing API claims by compiling or probing Trusting a source read
Gating rare or expensive paths behind references/ One large SKILL.md carrying every path

Do not over-correct: a skilled answer shorter and less actionable than the baseline's still loses.

Step 4: Create the skill directory

plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/
└── SKILL.md

Step 5: Generate SKILL.md with frontmatter

Create the file with the frontmatter drafted in Step 2.

Step 6: Add body content sections

Include these recommended sections:

  1. Purpose: One paragraph describing the outcome
  2. When to Use: Bullet list of appropriate scenarios
  3. When Not to Use: Boundaries and exclusions
  4. Inputs: Table of required and optional inputs
  5. Workflow: Numbered steps with checkpoints
  6. Validation: How to confirm the skill worked correctly
  7. Common Pitfalls: Known traps and how to avoid them

Step 7: Add optional directories (if needed)

plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md
├── scripts/       # Executable code agents can run
├── references/    # Additional documentation loaded on demand
└── assets/        # Templates, images, data files

Reference bundled files with paths relative to the directory that contains SKILL.md, such as references/details.md or scripts/validate.ps1. Do not tell the agent to search for the skill's installation directory. If a missing bundled file reduces the result quality, allow one listing of the known bundled-file directory and require the agent to report the reduced coverage.

Step 8: Update CODEOWNERS

Add entries in .github/CODEOWNERS for the new skill and its test directory:

/plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/  @owner-team
/tests/<plugin>/<skill-name>/           @owner-team

Match the owner pattern used by sibling skills in the same plugin.

Step 9: Validate the skill

  • Confirm frontmatter fields are valid
  • Ensure SKILL.md is under 500 lines
  • Check that file references use relative paths
  • Verify instructions are actionable and specific
  • Run dotnet run --project eng/skill-validator/src/SkillValidator.csproj -- check --plugin ./plugins/<plugin>

Step 10: Add the eval

A skill without an eval.yaml has no evidence that it improves on the baseline. Use create-skill-test to add one in the same pull request, and size it for statistical power — an eval below five distinct stimuli can never return a passing verdict.

The exception is a helper skill with disable-model-invocation: true: the model cannot self-activate it, so an activation-graded eval compares two identical arms. Cover it through the evals of the skills that load it instead.

SKILL.md Template

Use this template when creating a new skill:

---
name: <skill-name>
description: <1-1024 char description of what the skill does and when to use it>
---

# <Skill Title>

<One paragraph describing the skill's purpose and outcome.>

## When to Use

- <Scenario 1>
- <Scenario 2>

## When Not to Use

- <Exclusion 1>
- <Exclusion 2>

## Inputs

| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| <input-name> | Yes/No | <description> |

## Workflow

### Step 1: <Action>

<Instructions for this step>

### Step 2: <Action>

<Instructions for this step>

## Validation

- [ ] <Verification step 1>
- [ ] <Verification step 2>

## Common Pitfalls

| Pitfall | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| <Problem> | <How to avoid or fix> |

Validation Checklist

After creating a skill, verify:

  • Skill name matches directory name exactly
  • Skill name is lowercase with hyphens only
  • Description is non-empty and under 1024 characters
  • SKILL.md body is under 500 lines
  • Instructions are specific and actionable
  • Bundled-file paths are relative to the directory that contains SKILL.md
  • Missing bundled files cannot cause silent degradation
  • Workflow has numbered steps with clear checkpoints
  • Validation section exists with observable success criteria
  • No secrets, tokens, or internal URLs included
  • .github/CODEOWNERS has entries for the new skill and its test directory
  • The description names concrete triggers and excludes the nearest sibling skills
  • Every section changes a decision the unskilled model would otherwise get wrong
  • The skill states when not to act, and what a truthful failure report looks like
  • An eval.yaml exists and clears the distinct-stimulus floor (or the skill is disable-model-invocation: true and covered through its consumers)

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall Solution
Name contains uppercase letters Use only lowercase: code-review not Code-Review
Description is vague Include what it does AND when to use it
Instructions are ambiguous Use numbered steps with concrete actions
Missing validation steps Add checkpoints that verify success
SKILL.md too long Move detailed content to references/ files
Hardcoded environment assumptions Document requirements in compatibility field
Missing CODEOWNERS entry Add entries for both /plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/ and /tests/<plugin>/<skill-name>/ matching sibling skills' owner pattern
Skill restates what the model already knows Cut it; a skill is scored as a delta over the unskilled model
Discoverable paths listed as required inputs Tell the agent to discover them, or it will stop and ask the user
Description partitioned by topic against a sibling Partition on the real discriminator and exclude on both sides
Exclusion clause blocks the skill's own use cases Re-read every "do not use for" clause against real workflow phases
Skill added without an eval Add eval.yaml in the same PR; unevaluated skills carry no evidence

References

Files (skills)
  • SKILL.md 10.4 KB
    ---
    name: create-skill
    description: Scaffolds new agent skills for the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating a new skill, generating SKILL.md files, writing a skill description that the runtime will actually route to, or setting up skill directory structures. Handles frontmatter generation, section templates, and validation guidance. Do not use for fixing a skill that already fails its evaluation (use improve-skill-quality) or for writing eval.yaml (use create-skill-test).
    ---
    
    # Create Skill
    
    This skill helps you scaffold new agent skills that conform to the Agent Skills specification and the dotnet/skills repository conventions.
    
    ## When to Use
    
    - Creating a new skill from scratch
    - Generating a SKILL.md file with proper frontmatter
    - Setting up the skill directory structure with optional folders
    - Ensuring compliance with agentskills.io specification
    
    ## When Not to Use
    
    - Modifying existing skills (edit directly instead)
    - Diagnosing or fixing a skill that fails its evaluation (use `improve-skill-quality`)
    - Writing the skill's `eval.yaml` (use `create-skill-test`)
    - Creating custom agents (use the agents/ directory pattern)
    
    ## Inputs
    
    | Input | Required | Description |
    |-------|----------|-------------|
    | Skill name | Yes | Lowercase, alphanumeric, hyphens only (e.g., `code-review`, `ci-triage`) |
    | Description | Yes | What the skill does and when agents should use it (1-1024 chars) |
    | Purpose | Yes | One paragraph describing the outcome |
    | Workflow steps | Recommended | Numbered steps the agent should follow |
    
    ## Workflow
    
    ### Step 1: Validate the skill name
    
    Ensure the name:
    - Contains only lowercase letters, numbers, and hyphens
    - Does not start or end with a hyphen
    - Does not contain consecutive hyphens
    - Is between 1-64 characters
    
    ### Step 2: Write the description — it is the router
    
    The `description` is the **only** text the runtime sees when deciding whether to load the skill.
    A perfect body behind a weak description never runs.
    
    ```yaml
    ---
    name: <skill-name>
    description: <what it does>. USE FOR: <symptoms, error codes, artifact names, quoted user requests>. DO NOT USE FOR: <nearby-but-wrong intents, with the skill that owns them>.
    ---
    ```
    
    - Lead with an action verb and use the user's own words: symptoms, error codes (`CS1501`,
      `MSTEST0014`), artifact names (`.testsettings`, `binlog`), and requests phrased as a developer
      would type them.
    - Partition against sibling skills on the **real discriminator**, not the topic. "Does the
      abstraction already exist?" separates two skills; "testing" does not. Add the matching exclusion
      to **both** siblings.
    - Claim the ambiguous words that would otherwise route to a sibling. If prompts say "review my
      tests" and a sibling owns "review", say so explicitly.
    - Check every `DO NOT USE FOR` clause against the scenarios the skill exists to serve — an
      exclusion like "already on v3" can lock out the post-upgrade fixes that are the skill's purpose.
    - Budget: 1,024 characters per description, and the whole plugin's rendered skill menu is also
      budgeted. A helper skill users should never invoke directly can set
      `disable-model-invocation: true` to free menu space while staying invocable by name.
    
    ### Step 3: Write for delta over the baseline model
    
    Every skill is scored head-to-head against the same model with **no skill loaded**. Content the
    model already produces unaided is worth zero; content that makes it slower or more hedged is worth
    less than zero. See
    [improve-skill-quality/references/writing-for-baseline-delta.md](../improve-skill-quality/references/writing-for-baseline-delta.md)
    for the full evidence.
    
    | Do | Instead of |
    |----|------------|
    | Encode the decision the model would otherwise get wrong | Restating API signatures it already reproduces |
    | "When A, do B, never C, verify D" tables | Lists of plausible alternatives |
    | A concrete output contract (exact command, verdict line, findings table) | "Consider…", "you may want to…" |
    | Scale output structure to input size | A 12-section dashboard for an 8-test suite |
    | Stop-conditions that prevent over-applying | Acting before measuring, rewriting working code |
    | Instructing the agent to discover repo paths | Marking discoverable paths as required inputs |
    | Reporting restore/build/test failures truthfully | Claiming success after a failed command |
    | Verifying load-bearing API claims by compiling or probing | Trusting a source read |
    | Gating rare or expensive paths behind `references/` | One large SKILL.md carrying every path |
    
    Do not over-correct: a skilled answer shorter and less actionable than the baseline's still loses.
    
    ### Step 4: Create the skill directory
    
    ```
    plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/
    └── SKILL.md
    ```
    
    ### Step 5: Generate SKILL.md with frontmatter
    
    Create the file with the frontmatter drafted in Step 2.
    
    ### Step 6: Add body content sections
    
    Include these recommended sections:
    
    1. **Purpose**: One paragraph describing the outcome
    2. **When to Use**: Bullet list of appropriate scenarios
    3. **When Not to Use**: Boundaries and exclusions
    4. **Inputs**: Table of required and optional inputs
    5. **Workflow**: Numbered steps with checkpoints
    6. **Validation**: How to confirm the skill worked correctly
    7. **Common Pitfalls**: Known traps and how to avoid them
    
    ### Step 7: Add optional directories (if needed)
    
    ```
    plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/
    ├── SKILL.md
    ├── scripts/       # Executable code agents can run
    ├── references/    # Additional documentation loaded on demand
    └── assets/        # Templates, images, data files
    ```
    
    Reference bundled files with paths relative to the directory that contains `SKILL.md`, such as
    `references/details.md` or `scripts/validate.ps1`. Do not tell the agent to search for the skill's
    installation directory. If a missing bundled file reduces the result quality, allow one listing of
    the known bundled-file directory and require the agent to report the reduced coverage.
    
    ### Step 8: Update CODEOWNERS
    
    Add entries in `.github/CODEOWNERS` for the new skill and its test directory:
    
    ```
    /plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/  @owner-team
    /tests/<plugin>/<skill-name>/           @owner-team
    ```
    
    Match the owner pattern used by sibling skills in the same plugin.
    
    ### Step 9: Validate the skill
    
    - Confirm frontmatter fields are valid
    - Ensure SKILL.md is under 500 lines
    - Check that file references use relative paths
    - Verify instructions are actionable and specific
    - Run `dotnet run --project eng/skill-validator/src/SkillValidator.csproj -- check --plugin ./plugins/<plugin>`
    
    ### Step 10: Add the eval
    
    A skill without an `eval.yaml` has no evidence that it improves on the baseline. Use
    `create-skill-test` to add one in the same pull request, and size it for statistical power — an eval
    below five distinct stimuli can never return a passing verdict.
    
    The exception is a helper skill with `disable-model-invocation: true`: the model cannot
    self-activate it, so an activation-graded eval compares two identical arms. Cover it through the
    evals of the skills that load it instead.
    
    ## SKILL.md Template
    
    Use this template when creating a new skill:
    
    ```markdown
    ---
    name: <skill-name>
    description: <1-1024 char description of what the skill does and when to use it>
    ---
    
    # <Skill Title>
    
    <One paragraph describing the skill's purpose and outcome.>
    
    ## When to Use
    
    - <Scenario 1>
    - <Scenario 2>
    
    ## When Not to Use
    
    - <Exclusion 1>
    - <Exclusion 2>
    
    ## Inputs
    
    | Input | Required | Description |
    |-------|----------|-------------|
    | <input-name> | Yes/No | <description> |
    
    ## Workflow
    
    ### Step 1: <Action>
    
    <Instructions for this step>
    
    ### Step 2: <Action>
    
    <Instructions for this step>
    
    ## Validation
    
    - [ ] <Verification step 1>
    - [ ] <Verification step 2>
    
    ## Common Pitfalls
    
    | Pitfall | Solution |
    |---------|----------|
    | <Problem> | <How to avoid or fix> |
    ```
    
    ## Validation Checklist
    
    After creating a skill, verify:
    
    - [ ] Skill name matches directory name exactly
    - [ ] Skill name is lowercase with hyphens only
    - [ ] Description is non-empty and under 1024 characters
    - [ ] SKILL.md body is under 500 lines
    - [ ] Instructions are specific and actionable
    - [ ] Bundled-file paths are relative to the directory that contains `SKILL.md`
    - [ ] Missing bundled files cannot cause silent degradation
    - [ ] Workflow has numbered steps with clear checkpoints
    - [ ] Validation section exists with observable success criteria
    - [ ] No secrets, tokens, or internal URLs included
    - [ ] `.github/CODEOWNERS` has entries for the new skill and its test directory
    - [ ] The description names concrete triggers and excludes the nearest sibling skills
    - [ ] Every section changes a decision the unskilled model would otherwise get wrong
    - [ ] The skill states when **not** to act, and what a truthful failure report looks like
    - [ ] An `eval.yaml` exists and clears the distinct-stimulus floor (or the skill is `disable-model-invocation: true` and covered through its consumers)
    
    ## Common Pitfalls
    
    | Pitfall | Solution |
    |---------|----------|
    | Name contains uppercase letters | Use only lowercase: `code-review` not `Code-Review` |
    | Description is vague | Include what it does AND when to use it |
    | Instructions are ambiguous | Use numbered steps with concrete actions |
    | Missing validation steps | Add checkpoints that verify success |
    | SKILL.md too long | Move detailed content to `references/` files |
    | Hardcoded environment assumptions | Document requirements in `compatibility` field |
    | Missing CODEOWNERS entry | Add entries for both `/plugins/<plugin>/skills/<skill-name>/` and `/tests/<plugin>/<skill-name>/` matching sibling skills' owner pattern |
    | Skill restates what the model already knows | Cut it; a skill is scored as a delta over the unskilled model |
    | Discoverable paths listed as required inputs | Tell the agent to discover them, or it will stop and ask the user |
    | Description partitioned by topic against a sibling | Partition on the real discriminator and exclude on both sides |
    | Exclusion clause blocks the skill's own use cases | Re-read every "do not use for" clause against real workflow phases |
    | Skill added without an eval | Add `eval.yaml` in the same PR; unevaluated skills carry no evidence |
    
    ## References
    
    - [Agent Skills Specification](https://agentskills.io/specification)
    - [Repository README](../../../README.md)
    - [Contributing Guidelines](../../../CONTRIBUTING.md)
    - [create-skill-test](../create-skill-test/SKILL.md) — authoring the skill's `eval.yaml`
    - [improve-skill-quality](../improve-skill-quality/SKILL.md) — fixing a skill that loses to its baseline
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related