Claude
Skill
contract-reviewer
Review commercial contracts - flag risky clauses, missing protections, and negotiation points. Use before signing or sending any agreement. Not a substitute for a lawyer.
Virus-scanned
Reviewed automatically before listing.
Download
navinspire-ia-navin-navin_skills_contract-reviewer-e9c73a3.zip · 1 KB
Install
skills CLI
npx skills add https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin/tree/main/navin/skills/contract-reviewer
Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install navinspire-ia-navin@llmmart
Git
git clone https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin.git
The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole navinspire-ia/navin collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.
Skill manifest
Contract Reviewer
Overview
Systematic first-pass review of commercial agreements: what's risky, what's missing, what to negotiate. Final review of significant contracts belongs to a qualified lawyer - say so every time.
Clause checklist
| Clause | Check for |
|---|---|
| Scope / SOW | precise deliverables, change-request process defined |
| Payment | terms, currency, late penalties, milestones vs completion |
| Liability | cap (ideally ≤ contract value), no unlimited liability, no broad indemnities |
| IP | who owns deliverables, pre-existing IP carve-out, license-back |
| Termination | exit rights for both sides, notice period, kill fees |
| Confidentiality/NDA | mutual, reasonable duration, standard carve-outs |
| Data | GDPR/local law compliance, hosting location, subprocessors |
| Non-compete/exclusivity | scope, duration, geography - proportionate? |
| Penalties/SLA | achievable? cap on penalties? force majeure? |
| Law & disputes | governing law, jurisdiction/arbitration (critical cross-border DZ/Gulf/EU) |
Workflow
- Ingest the contract (
pdf-ocr-extractorfor scans); identify type and our side. - Review clause by clause; classify findings: 🔴 blocker / 🟡 negotiate / 🟢 acceptable / ⚪ missing clause to add.
- For each 🔴/🟡: quote the exact text, explain the risk in one sentence, propose alternative wording.
- Deliver the review memo + a markup list; recommend lawyer review for anything high-stakes.
Review memo format
## Contract review - <name> (<our role>)
Verdict: sign / negotiate first / lawyer required
### 🔴 Blockers
### 🟡 Negotiation points (with proposed wording)
### ⚪ Missing protections
Rules
- Always state this is analysis, not legal advice.
- Quote exact clause text - never paraphrase a risk.
- Cross-border contracts always get the "lawyer required" flag.
Files (navin)
-
SKILL.md 2.1 KB
--- name: contract-reviewer description: Review commercial contracts - flag risky clauses, missing protections, and negotiation points. Use before signing or sending any agreement. Not a substitute for a lawyer. metadata: {"navin":{"emoji":"📜","category":"sales"}} --- # Contract Reviewer ## Overview Systematic first-pass review of commercial agreements: what's risky, what's missing, what to negotiate. Final review of significant contracts belongs to a qualified lawyer - say so every time. ## Clause checklist | Clause | Check for | |--------|-----------| | Scope / SOW | precise deliverables, change-request process defined | | Payment | terms, currency, late penalties, milestones vs completion | | Liability | cap (ideally ≤ contract value), no unlimited liability, no broad indemnities | | IP | who owns deliverables, pre-existing IP carve-out, license-back | | Termination | exit rights for both sides, notice period, kill fees | | Confidentiality/NDA | mutual, reasonable duration, standard carve-outs | | Data | GDPR/local law compliance, hosting location, subprocessors | | Non-compete/exclusivity | scope, duration, geography - proportionate? | | Penalties/SLA | achievable? cap on penalties? force majeure? | | Law & disputes | governing law, jurisdiction/arbitration (critical cross-border DZ/Gulf/EU) | ## Workflow 1. Ingest the contract (`pdf-ocr-extractor` for scans); identify type and our side. 2. Review clause by clause; classify findings: 🔴 blocker / 🟡 negotiate / 🟢 acceptable / ⚪ missing clause to add. 3. For each 🔴/🟡: quote the exact text, explain the risk in one sentence, propose alternative wording. 4. Deliver the review memo + a markup list; recommend lawyer review for anything high-stakes. ## Review memo format ```markdown ## Contract review - <name> (<our role>) Verdict: sign / negotiate first / lawyer required ### 🔴 Blockers ### 🟡 Negotiation points (with proposed wording) ### ⚪ Missing protections ``` ## Rules - Always state this is analysis, not legal advice. - Quote exact clause text - never paraphrase a risk. - Cross-border contracts always get the "lawyer required" flag.
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation.
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet.
No comments yet.