Claude Skill

contract-reviewer

Review commercial contracts - flag risky clauses, missing protections, and negotiation points. Use before signing or sending any agreement. Not a substitute for a lawyer.

LLM Mart · 0 points · 0 views 0 listing impressions 0 install-command copies
Virus-scanned Reviewed automatically before listing.

Full trust report

Download navinspire-ia-navin-navin_skills_contract-reviewer-e9c73a3.zip · 1 KB
Part of navinspire-ia/navin — 182 skills

Install

skills CLI npx skills add https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin/tree/main/navin/skills/contract-reviewer
Claude Code claude plugin marketplace add https://llmmart.ai/marketplace.json && claude plugin install navinspire-ia-navin@llmmart
Git git clone https://github.com/Navinspire-ia/navin.git

The skills CLI installs just this skill, for any of its supported agents. Claude Code installs the whole navinspire-ia/navin collection as a plugin from our marketplace. Git is the plain clone.

Skill manifest

Contract Reviewer

Overview

Systematic first-pass review of commercial agreements: what's risky, what's missing, what to negotiate. Final review of significant contracts belongs to a qualified lawyer - say so every time.

Clause checklist

Clause Check for
Scope / SOW precise deliverables, change-request process defined
Payment terms, currency, late penalties, milestones vs completion
Liability cap (ideally ≤ contract value), no unlimited liability, no broad indemnities
IP who owns deliverables, pre-existing IP carve-out, license-back
Termination exit rights for both sides, notice period, kill fees
Confidentiality/NDA mutual, reasonable duration, standard carve-outs
Data GDPR/local law compliance, hosting location, subprocessors
Non-compete/exclusivity scope, duration, geography - proportionate?
Penalties/SLA achievable? cap on penalties? force majeure?
Law & disputes governing law, jurisdiction/arbitration (critical cross-border DZ/Gulf/EU)

Workflow

  1. Ingest the contract (pdf-ocr-extractor for scans); identify type and our side.
  2. Review clause by clause; classify findings: 🔴 blocker / 🟡 negotiate / 🟢 acceptable / ⚪ missing clause to add.
  3. For each 🔴/🟡: quote the exact text, explain the risk in one sentence, propose alternative wording.
  4. Deliver the review memo + a markup list; recommend lawyer review for anything high-stakes.

Review memo format

## Contract review - <name> (<our role>)
Verdict: sign / negotiate first / lawyer required
### 🔴 Blockers
### 🟡 Negotiation points (with proposed wording)
### ⚪ Missing protections

Rules

  • Always state this is analysis, not legal advice.
  • Quote exact clause text - never paraphrase a risk.
  • Cross-border contracts always get the "lawyer required" flag.
Files (navin)
  • SKILL.md 2.1 KB
    ---
    name: contract-reviewer
    description: Review commercial contracts - flag risky clauses, missing protections, and negotiation points. Use before signing or sending any agreement. Not a substitute for a lawyer.
    metadata: {"navin":{"emoji":"📜","category":"sales"}}
    ---
    
    # Contract Reviewer
    
    ## Overview
    
    Systematic first-pass review of commercial agreements: what's risky, what's missing, what to negotiate. Final review of significant contracts belongs to a qualified lawyer - say so every time.
    
    ## Clause checklist
    
    | Clause | Check for |
    |--------|-----------|
    | Scope / SOW | precise deliverables, change-request process defined |
    | Payment | terms, currency, late penalties, milestones vs completion |
    | Liability | cap (ideally ≤ contract value), no unlimited liability, no broad indemnities |
    | IP | who owns deliverables, pre-existing IP carve-out, license-back |
    | Termination | exit rights for both sides, notice period, kill fees |
    | Confidentiality/NDA | mutual, reasonable duration, standard carve-outs |
    | Data | GDPR/local law compliance, hosting location, subprocessors |
    | Non-compete/exclusivity | scope, duration, geography - proportionate? |
    | Penalties/SLA | achievable? cap on penalties? force majeure? |
    | Law & disputes | governing law, jurisdiction/arbitration (critical cross-border DZ/Gulf/EU) |
    
    ## Workflow
    
    1. Ingest the contract (`pdf-ocr-extractor` for scans); identify type and our side.
    2. Review clause by clause; classify findings: 🔴 blocker / 🟡 negotiate / 🟢 acceptable / ⚪ missing clause to add.
    3. For each 🔴/🟡: quote the exact text, explain the risk in one sentence, propose alternative wording.
    4. Deliver the review memo + a markup list; recommend lawyer review for anything high-stakes.
    
    ## Review memo format
    
    ```markdown
    ## Contract review - <name> (<our role>)
    Verdict: sign / negotiate first / lawyer required
    ### 🔴 Blockers
    ### 🟡 Negotiation points (with proposed wording)
    ### ⚪ Missing protections
    ```
    
    ## Rules
    
    - Always state this is analysis, not legal advice.
    - Quote exact clause text - never paraphrase a risk.
    - Cross-border contracts always get the "lawyer required" flag.
    

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet.

Related